1 |
Preval?ncia da doen?a renal e de fatores de risco para doen?a renal cr?nica em trabalhadores negros da ?rea da sa?deSouza, C?lia Mariana Barbosa de 29 March 2012 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T13:35:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
439241.pdf: 787581 bytes, checksum: 694a1c96909ef78e31343f07b4121e83 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-03-29 / Introduction: Few studies have evaluated the chronic kidney disease (CKD) risk factors for in black populations. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of renal disease (RD), risk factors for CKD and compare the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by three methods in a group of black workers in the health field.
Methods: We evaluated in a cross sectional observational study 313 individuals from the black staff of a university hospital, workers from different health professions. Was defined RD bearing individuals with GFR below 90ml/minute or protein/creatinine index in urine sample up to or greater than 0.3. We estimated the glomerular filtration using three equations: Crockoft-Gault, MDRD and CKD EPI. For data collection was used a structured questionnaire containing demographic data, risk factors for CKD, serum creatinine, blood pressure (BP) and GFR.
Results: In the 313 participants 80.8% were female. The risk factors were present in this proportion: 26.8% with a diagnosis of hypertension (HA), 8.3% diabetes mellitus (DM), 79.9% with a family history (FH) of hypertension, 49.2% FH and DM, 6.45% FH for dyslipidemia, and 19.8% FH with CKD, BMI with or greater than 30 kg /m?. The prevalence of RD ranged between 12.5% (CKD-EPI) and 18.8% (MDRD). The higher prevalence of RD was observed at the stage of eGFR between 60 and 89 mL/minute. In individuals with RD, there was difference between the eGFR for the CG or MDRD and CKDEPI equations (P<0.001) difference among the three formulas for the total group analysis (P <0.001).
Conclusion: RD was present in at least 12.2% of the studied group. The prevalence of RD was lower when using the CKD-EPI equation, compared to the CG and MDRD equations. It was demonstrated statistical significance (P <0.05) for the highest average age of patients with RD compared the diagnosis by eGFR by the three equations used with other individuals in the study. Among the associations of risk in the total group the most frequent were HA and FH with HA. Among the variables examined, only the mean of systolic BP was different and higher, when comparing individuals with risk factor for RD and those without this risk factor / Introdu??o: Poucos estudos t?m avaliado os fatores de risco da Doen?a Renal Cr?nica (DRC) em popula??es negras. Esta investiga??o teve como objetivo conhecer a preval?ncia da doen?a renal (DR), de fatores de risco para DRC e comparar a filtra??o glomerular estimada (FGE) por tr?s m?todos em um grupo de trabalhadores negros na ?rea da sa?de.
M?todos: Em um estudo observacional transversal, foram avaliados 313 indiv?duos negros do quadro funcional de um hospital universit?rio, trabalhadores de diferentes profiss?es da sa?de. Definiu-se portadores de DR os indiv?duos com a FGE abaixo de 90ml/minuto ou com ?ndice proteina/creatinina em amostra de urina igual ou maior que 0,3. Estimou-se a filtra??o glomerular utilizando-se tr?s equa??es: Crockoft-Gault, MDRD e CKD EPI. Para a coleta dos dados, foi estruturado um question?rio, contendo dados demogr?ficos, fatores de risco para DRC, creatinina s?rica, press?o arterial (PA) e FGE.
Resultados: Dos 313 participantes 80,8% foram do sexo feminino. Os fatores de risco estiveram presentes nesta propor??o: 26,8% tinham diagnostico de hipertens?o arterial (HA), 8,3% de diabetes mellitus (DM), 79,9% de hist?ria familiar (HF) de HA, 49,2% de HF de DM, 6,45% HF de dislipidemia, 19,8% HF de DRC, IMC igual ou maior que 30Kg/m?. A preval?ncia de DR variou entre 12,5% (CKD-EPI) e 18,8% (MDRD). A maior preval?ncia de DR foi evidenciada no est?gio de FGE entre 60 e 89 mL/minuto. Nos indiv?duos com DR, houve diferen?a para a FGE entre as f?rmulas CG ou MDRD e CKD-EPI (P<0,001) havendo diferen?a entre as tr?s f?rmulas para o grupo total analisado (P<0,001).
Conclus?o: DR esteve presente em no m?nimo 12,2% do grupo estudado. A preval?ncia da DR foi menor quando utilizamos a equa??o CKD-EPI, comparada ?s equa??es CG e MDRD. Foi evidenciada signific?ncia estat?stica (para P<0,05) para a maior m?dia de idade dos indiv?duos com DR, quando comparado o diagn?stico atrav?s da FGE pelas tr?s equa??es utilizadas com os demais indiv?duos em estudo. Entre as associa??es de risco no grupo total as mais freq?entes foram HAS e HF de HAS. Entre as vari?veis examinadas, apenas a m?dia de PA sist?lica foi diferente e maior, quando comparamos os indiv?duos com fator de risco para DR e aqueles sem este fator de risco.
|
Page generated in 0.0236 seconds