Spelling suggestions: "subject:"dew regulatory"" "subject:"cew regulatory""
1 |
Portos do Brasil: um balanço econômico e institucional em 2012Bezerra, Marlon de Freiras 22 April 2015 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:48:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Marlon de Freitas Bezerra.pdf: 7340215 bytes, checksum: bbf6d61a3bb55dbd62475efb4a83763b (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-04-22 / As a starting point and main motivation the strong growth of the Brazilian international trade and the resumption of public and private investment in economic infrastructure. These factors lead us to the conclusion that the Brazilian port sector is fundamentally strategic and has undergone profound changes in their structures, given the need for modernization in the context of the new global economic reality imposed by globalization. The focus of this study focuses on recent economic developments in ports and in more detail in its laws and regulations, in order to identify potential obstacles that present themselves for investments. Therefore, addressed the current configuration of the institutional framework of the Brazilian port system, which gave the repeal of Law 8,630 / 93 (Ports Law) by the Provisional Measure No. 595 ("MP 595"), 06 December 2012, converted into so-called "new law of ports", law No. 12,815 - new regulatory framework for the sector, June 5, 2013, analyzing the main changes and consequences to public and private investment. Following it holds the effective characterization of each of the 32 ports involved with Brazil's foreign trade in 2012, generating the port ranking across six economic variables used to characterize and rank Brazilian ports are: 1. Porte; 2. Influence Area (Hinterland); 3. Participation in International Trade; 4. Products Busiest by Economic Sectors; 5. Field National Work, Regional or Local; 6. Value-added of Eastern Busiest producer. Thus, it was possible to capture more properly the weight that each economic variable has for each port individually, and its relevance to the national port ranking as a whole / Como ponto de partida e motivação principal o forte crescimento do comércio internacional brasileiro e a retomada de investimentos públicos e privados na infraestrutura econômica. Estes fatores nos levam à constatação de que o setor portuário brasileiro é fundamentalmente estratégico e tem passado por profundas alterações em suas estruturas, dada a necessidade de sua modernização no contexto da nova realidade econômica mundial imposta pela mundialização. O foco do presente estudo centra-se na evolução econômica recente dos portos e, mais detalhadamente, na sua legislação e regulamentação, de modo a identificar potenciais entraves que se apresentam para os investimentos. Para tanto, abordou-se a configuração atual do quadro institucional do sistema portuário brasileiro, que se deu com a revogação da Lei 8.630/93 (Lei dos Portos) por meio da Medida Provisória N° 595 ( MP 595 ), de 06 de dezembro de 2012, posteriormente convertida na chamada nova lei dos portos , lei N° 12.815 - novo marco regulatório do setor, de 05 de junho de 2013, analisando suas principais alterações e consequências ao investimento público e privado. Na sequência, realiza-se a efetiva caracterização de cada um dos 32 portos envolvidos com o comércio externo do Brasil no ano de 2012, gerando o ranking portuário através de seis variáveis econômicas utilizadas para caracterizar e elencar os portos brasileiros são: 1. Porte; 2. Área de Influência (Hinterlândia); 3. Participação no Comércio Internacional; 4. Produtos Movimentados por Setores Econômicos; 5. Campo de Atuação Nacional, Regional ou Local; 6. Valor Agregado Médio dos Produtos Movimentados. Assim, foi possível captar com mais propriedade o peso que cada variável econômica possui em relação a cada porto, individualmente, e sua relevância para o ranking portuário nacional como um todo
|
2 |
Ny tillsynsmodell med tillhörande marknadsorienterade styrmedel : En granskning av föreslagen tillsynsmodell med Danmarks arbetsmiljömodell som förebildStaerner, Rebecka January 2011 (has links)
The corporate world has become increasingly unpredictable and complex. Several companies are dependent on a rapidly developing market. The development has created a positive impact on production but on working conditions it has resulted in increased work pace and load. Psychosocial and stress-related problems has increased. The development has also meant a greater awareness of work environment issues relevant to competition for customers and employees. The committee directive 2008:129, Marknadsorienterade styrmedel på arbetsmiljöområdet, describes the desire and the need to engender a more positive and aggressive treatment in the Swedish work environment policy. In addition to preventing poor work environment it will develop the working environment, develop individuals, been seen as a competitive weapon, and a success factor. On this basis, investigations, SOU 2009:40 and SOU 2009:97, were conducted. As a result of these a pilot of a new regulatory model in Sweden are tested.The study will examine regulatory model, how it works in the current situation and how the proposal that emerged during the years 2009, changes the regulatory model to the type of model that Denmark applies. The systematic work has importance for the supervision on a daily basis. The purpose is to create a good working environment and enforce the law. Therefore, its function and purpose of supervision is discussed. The majority opinions from Swedish social partners is most critical of the introduction, they are of interest in the study and are therefore presented. The study is being conducted from a legal dogmatic and analytical method. The findings of this study is critical to the implementation of the proposals. The reason lies in deficiencies in the investigations, the costs and the social partners' opinions. The positive incentives that the proposals presents does not weigh up for the deficiencies identified. The study also focuses on the importance of proper systematic work and its relationship to a more effective supervision. The key to this is described in the study as increased knowledge and advice in the work area both during education but also in the practical work in organizations. Instead of a new regulatory model should the current model be developed and can then create the desired effect on the labor market.
|
Page generated in 0.0793 seconds