Spelling suggestions: "subject:"nominalism."" "subject:"nominalismo.""
1 |
An investigation of Raymond Boudon's paradigm of social actionLins, Cynthia de Carvalho January 1997 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Erkennen und wissen nach Gregor von Rimini. Ein beitrag zur geschichte der erkenntnistheorie des nominalsmusWürsdörfer, Joseph. January 1917 (has links)
Inaug.-diss.--München. / Vita.
|
3 |
Berkeley nominalisten en kunskapsfilosofisk undersökning.Andree, Mikael. January 1919 (has links)
Akademisk avhandling--Uppsala. / Anförd litteratur: p. [ix]-x.
|
4 |
The epistemology of Pierre D'AillyParkes, Joseph Peter, January 1970 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1970. / eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.
|
5 |
Quinean meta-ontology and fictionalismStokes, Mitchell O. January 2005 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Notre Dame, 2005. / Thesis directed by Alvin Plantinga and Peter van Inwagen for the Department of Philosophy. "July 2005." Includes bibliographical references (leaves 195-198).
|
6 |
A new defense of realismMantegani, Nicholas Buckley 19 November 2012 (has links)
In this dissertation, I defend the claim that realism – that is, a theory committed to an ontology of universals and particulars – is a more viable theory than any of the others adopted in order solve to the problem of universals. I begin in chapter 1 by setting out a method for comparing the various theories offered as solutions to this problem that is based primarily on a preference for those theories that exhibit greater ontological parsimony. In developing this method I endorse rather than reject (as is standard for realists to do) Quine’s criterion of ontological commitment. In chapter 2, I utilize the aforementioned method of theory comparison to argue for the greater comparative viability of realism over each of its primary competitors. In chapter 3, I set out and offer a solution to the “problem of instantiation”, which has traditionally been taken to be the most difficult problem for realists to solve. Finally, in chapter 4, I discuss two remaining issues that face the sort of “Quinean” realism that I prefer: (1) the ability of this version of realism to accommodate the traditional realist distinction between universals and particulars, and (2) the ability of this version of realism to account for “relational facts” while maintaining its greater comparative viability over its competitors. / text
|
7 |
The problem of predicationKnight, Susan January 1978 (has links)
vii, 216 leaves ; 30 cm. / Title page, contents and abstract only. The complete thesis in print form is available from the University Library. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Adelaide, Dept. of Philosophy, 1979
|
8 |
The problem of predication.Knight, Susan. January 1978 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (Ph.D.) -- University of Adelaide, Dept. of Philosophy, 1979.
|
9 |
The name of the <i>Risus</i> : nominalism, the carnivalesque and the pursuit of truths in Chaucer's the <i>Wife of Bath's prologue</i> and <i>Tale</i> and the <i>Clerk's tale</i>Grossi, Joseph Luke January 1994 (has links)
No description available.
|
10 |
Nominalist's credoCollin, James Henry January 2013 (has links)
Introduction: I lay out the broad contours of my thesis: a defence of mathematical nominalism, and nominalism more generally. I discuss the possibility of metaphysics, and the relationship of nominalism to naturalism and pragmatism. Chapter 2: I delineate an account of abstractness. I then provide counter-arguments to claims that mathematical objects make a di erence to the concrete world, and claim that mathematical objects are abstract in the sense delineated. Chapter 3: I argue that the epistemological problem with abstract objects is not best understood as an incompatibility with a causal theory of knowledge, or as an inability to explain the reliability of our mathematical beliefs, but resides in the epistemic luck that would infect any belief about abstract objects. To this end, I develop an account of epistemic luck that can account for cases of belief in necessary truths and apply it to the mathematical case. Chapter 4: I consider objections, based on (meta)metaphysical considerations and linguistic data, to the view that the existential quantifier expresses existence. I argue that these considerations can be accommodated by an existentially committing quantifier when the pragmatics of quantified sentences are properly understood. I develop a semi-formal framework within which we can define a notion of nominalistic adequacy. I show how our notion of nominalistic adequacy can show why it is legitimate for the nominalist to make use of platonistic “assumptions” in inference-making. Chapter 5: I turn to the application of mathematics in science, including explanatory applications, and its relation to a number of indispensability arguments. I consider also issues of realism and anti-realism, and their relation to these arguments. I argue that abstraction away from pragmatic considerations has acted to skew the debate, and has obscured possibilities for a nominalistic understanding of mathematical practices. I end by explaining the notion of a pragmatic meta-vocabulary, and argue that this notion can be used to carve out a new way of locating our ontological commitments. Chapter 6: I show how the apparatus developed in earlier chapters can be utilised to roll out the nominalist project to other domains of discourse. In particular, I consider propositions and types. I claim that a unified account of nominalism across these domains is available. Conclusion: I recapitulate the claims of my thesis. I suggest that the goal of mathematical enquiry is not descriptive knowledge, but understanding.
|
Page generated in 0.0573 seconds