Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Freiburg im Breisgau.

La notion de juridiction gracieuse est traditionnellement rattachée à l’activité du juge civil. Le juge administratif connaît pourtant d’une activité gracieuse a côté de son activité contentieuse. Entendue comme l’activité du juge en dehors de tout litige, elle est peu étudiée en droit administratif, mais largement analysée en droit judiciaire privé. Il pourtant est intéressant de comparer la manière dont les juges envisagent leur office dans le cadre gracieux, et d’approfondir les points communs et les divergences entre les deux régimes juridiques. Le développement d’une telle activité peut cependant apparaître paradoxal à l’heure où les tribunaux sont toujours plus engorgés et l’attrait pour les modes alternatifs de règlement des litiges, toujours plus développé. La progression de l’activité d’homologation de certains actes administratifs et notamment des transactions peut cependant permettre d’éviter la longueur d’un procès. Cette nouvelle procédure peut ainsi favoriser le renouvellement du principe de sécurité juridique et d’envisager sous un nouvel angle la définition de la fonction juridictionnelle du juge administratif. / The notion of non-contentious jurisdiction is traditionally connected to the activity of the civil judge. Still, the administrative judge administers contentious as well as non-contentious justice. Understood as the activity of the judge outside of any litigation, it is little studied in administrative law but widely examined in private judiciary law. Nevertheless, it is interesting to compare the way judges consider their office in a non-contentious frame as well as analyse further the common points and the differences between the two juridical regimes. However, the development of such an activity can appear paradoxical when courts keep being more and more congested and when the attraction for alternative ways of settling disputes keeps developing. Yet, the progression of the certification activity of some administrative acts, including transactions, can make it possible to avoid the length of a trial. This new procedure can thus favor the renewal of the principle of juridical security and makes it possible to consider from a new point of view the definition of the jurisdictional function of the administrative judge.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:20:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Renata Giovanoni Di Mauro.pdf: 912780 bytes, checksum: efcacae06067333fc82ea3a7d7f7dc50 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-11-25 / This thesis aims to recognize the judge powers regarding the flexibility of civil proceedings on the Statute of Children and Adolescents. In this area, the caput of article 153 of Law n. 8.069/90, and its sole paragraph, they become the legal instruments that legitimize such procedural flexibility, in order that the children and adolescents effective overall protection is a reality. It follows that the interpretation methods assume a significant role, because they reveal the real meaning and significance of the words above the legal provisions. The use of hermeneutics shows that the ex officio role in the proceedings of voluntary jurisdiction, supported, including Article 1109 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is a response to the need for simplification of the procedural acts and the adequacy of the procedural sequence requires that each factual situation. On the other hand, as for the acting ex officio to the procedures of contentious jurisdiction, the use of interpretative methods in the study of Article 153 and its sole paragraph, of the Children and Adolescents statute, shows that the relaxation is subject to the approval of the litigants as well as the prosecutor when it is not a party. Protection (constitutional and infraconstitutional) focused on children and adolescents inspires effectiveness in adjudication, justifying the use of procedural flexibility. It is not about permission to arbitrariness, but breaking the excessive formalism, which enables the concentration of process and change as a result of such acts, so that the full protection of the child comes true, no violation of the principles and procedural lien / O presente trabalho objetiva reconhecer os poderes do juiz no que tange à flexibilização dos procedimentos civis sujeitos ao Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente. Nessa seara, o caput do artigo 153 da Lei n. 8.069/90, bem como o seu parágrafo único, vêm a ser os instrumentos legais que legitimam tal flexibilização procedimental, visando que a efetiva proteção integral da criança e do adolescente seja uma realidade. Do exposto resulta que os métodos de interpretação assumem um significativo papel, pois revelam o real sentido e alcance das palavras do dispositivo legal supramencionado. O emprego da hermenêutica evidencia que a atuação ex officio nos procedimentos de jurisdição voluntária, amparada, inclusive, no artigo 1.109 do Código de Processo Civil, é uma resposta à necessidade de simplificação dos atos processuais e à adequação da sequência procedimental que cada situação fática exige. Por outro lado, quanto à atuação ex officio nos procedimentos de jurisdição contenciosa, o emprego dos métodos de interpretação no estudo do artigo 153 e seu parágrafo único, do Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente, demonstra que a flexibilização está condicionada à anuência dos litigantes, bem como do Ministério Público, quando não for parte. A proteção (constitucional e infraconstitucional) voltada às crianças e aos adolescentes inspira a efetividade na prestação jurisdicional, justificando o emprego da flexibilização procedimental. Não se trata de permissão à arbitrariedade, mas de ruptura do excesso de formalismo, que possibilita a concentração de atos processuais e a mudança na sequência de tais atos, para que a proteção integral do menor se concretize, sem a violação dos princípios e garantias processuais