Thesis advisor: David B. Miele / Institutional efforts to address attainment gaps in higher education have traditionally centered on deficit-oriented discourses that frame Black and Hispanic students, low-income students, and first-generation college students as ‘at-risk’ and ‘underprepared’. Given the extensive amount of evidence documenting the adverse consequences of labeling and stigmatization, relying on negative descriptors to characterize marginalized students may be detrimental to their motivation and persistence in college—and may inadvertently exacerbate disparities in graduation rates between these students and students from more privileged backgrounds. A total of three online studies were conducted for this dissertation, which explores the deficit-oriented labeling experiences of low-income, first-generation Black and Hispanic college students (LIFG; n= 256) and their non-low-income, continuing-generation White peers (NLIFG; n= 317). In Studies 1 and 2, participants were asked to respond to a series of prompts designed to examine the extent to which deficit-oriented labels were applied to them, the contexts in which this occurred, and the motivational and affective consequences they experienced as a result. In Studies 1 and 3, hypothetical scenarios were used to probe participants’ interpretations of both deficit-oriented and alternative labels (i.e., first-generation student), as well as the perceived consequences of being characterized by these descriptors. Study 3 also explored potential stereotype threat effects that might result from being characterized by a deficit-oriented label. Specifically, participants were randomly assigned to recall an experience in which they were labeled as an at-risk or first-year student, and then asked to complete an analytical task. Students’ academic mindsets, stereotype vulnerability, and racial identity beliefs were also explored as potential moderators for within and between-group differences in Studies 2 and 3. Results showed that relative to NLIFG students, LIFG students were significantly more likely to report being labeled by deficit-oriented descriptors. The frequency of these labeling experiences was also significantly associated with negative academic self-perceptions, sense of belonging, and affect, for both LIFG and NLIFG students. Across both sample groups, participants generally indicated that these labels were most often communicated to them by instructors and advisors. Responses to the hypothetical scenarios indicated that LIFG students were more nuanced in their interpretations of different labels, but there were no sample group differences in the extent to which participants expected these labeling experiences to negatively affect hypothetical students. There was no evidence of stereotype threat effects on subsequent performance, but this result may have been due to limitations associated with the manipulation task. Lastly, there was evidence to suggest that endorsing stronger academic growth mindsets may mitigate the negative effects of these stigmatizing experiences. The implications of these findings and recommendations for future work are also discussed. / Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2019. / Submitted to: Boston College. Lynch School of Education. / Discipline: Counseling, Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Dual credit options allow high school students to enter college with college credits earned, as well as gain lived experience of the role expectations, academic rigor, and time it takes to complete college-level work. While past studies have identified benefits of dual credit for first-generation college students in particular, few have investigated the nature of that relationship. This qualitative study examined the relationship between first-generation students’ dual credit experiences and academic self-efficacy. Interviews were conducted with three first-generation college students in fall 2019. Findings indicate first-generation students who engage in a rigorous dual credit experience that results in mastery experience are more prepared for the academic expectations of college, master the role of a student, and perceive an increase in academic self-efficacy. This experience may provide first-generation students with knowledge and transition skills for college that their continuing generation peers find elsewhere. Implications and recommendations for future research are discussed.

This study explores a variety of variables with the intent of identifying specific student groups that may struggle with performance in a large general education course. The ultimate objective of this study is to facilitate the success of acknowledged at-risk students. Drawing in part on the theory of social capital, this study examines established, pre-college predictors such as high school grade point averages and ACT scores, other demographic characteristics and stressors, and an optional study group course to parse out information related to course performance. Methods used included t-tests and multiple regression analysis using five statistical models. A portion of the Student-Life Stress Inventory (Gadzella, 1994) was sent to students to gather primary data. A total of 1,626 students completed the survey: 957 female and 669 male. Demographic information was obtained from the university. After controlling for factors such race, sex, estimated household income, parent educational level, and self-reported stress, findings identified differences in course performance based on specific student characteristics. The findings of this study highlight the importance of pre-college predictors and course related features in individual student performance, while acknowledging the implications of race, first-generation status, and other demographic factors. These findings may help inform universities as they identify and implement supports for academically at- risk student populations in large university courses.

This paper analyses the probability that first- and second-generation immigrants in Sweden enter the self-employment market, and the propensity of being self-employed in certain industry levels. Furthermore, whether the motives and characteristics for choosing self-employment differ between generations by including control variables. To solve this thesis question, a cross-sectional sampling from the European Social Survey database between the years 2010 to 2018 and the Linear Probability Model was used. The result in this study indicated that the propensity to become self-employed is not significant between the analysed generations. Concluding that first- and second-generation immigrants have an equal amount of activeness in self-employment and that all characteristics have an effect on their propensity to become self-employed. The generations being self-employed in the low-barrier industry is dependent on their educational level. It was found that females had the highest probability of being self-employed in comparison to males. However, a drawback of this study was the sample size which was significantly small and also the multiple variables that were insignificant.

No description available.

This study employed narrative methods to explore how two Somali-Canadian women formed and understood their identities as first-generation university students. In conceptualizing identity, the study draws on sociological literature that frames identities as a collection of social roles that are performed. Within this framework, university student is a cultural object related to specific kinds of capital. The data are presented in narrative form, based in life history and life story approaches. Within their narratives, participants recounted the ways in which their attempts at developing a university student identity were complicated by their identities as Black, Muslim, economically marginalized individuals from refugee backgrounds. The tension at the heart of each participants’ narrative was not how to perform the university student role, but the cost of that performance on other parts of their identity. These findings reveal the narrow definition university student within the Canadian imagination and its consequence for the lives of marginalized communities.

The unique experience of first generation college students from frontier communities as they transition to college has not yet been explored in the literature. The current study was designed to explore those experiences and the ways the frontier context and first generation status shape identity development once these youth have left their families and home communities and made the transition to college. To gain a rich understanding of the experiences of first generation college students from frontier communities, this study employed a phenomenological qualitative design and the findings were interpreted through a social constructionist lens. Eleven emerging adults were recruited from Utah State University for the current study. In-depth interviews were conducted with all study participants. In addition, each participant brought an item of significance to the interview and responded to a member checking email. Results of the study indicated that the emerging adults in the sample faced challenges when making the transition to college, but that these challenges were also accompanied by positive experiences. Four themes emerged as relevant to the participants’ identity formation in the college context: hard work, religion, appreciation for living simply, and importance of being a role model. For the current sample, their status as first generation students and the frontier context in which they were raised shaped their identities in unique ways. This interplay is discussed along with directions for future research.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect generational status had on the overall college adjustment experiences of Hispanic community college students. A total of 75 Hispanic students enrolled in their 1st year of study at a comprehensive community college located in south Texas agreed to participate in the study after being recruited using a convenience sampling method. Participating students were asked to complete a brief demographic questionnaire and the self-report Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire (SACQ). Mean difference scores across the 4 subscales of the SACQ were compared using a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) design. The results of the MANOVA analysis indicated significant differences existing between first-generation and continuing-generation students on 2 of the 4 SACQ subscales, with social adjustment and institutional attachment being the only areas in which significant differences did not exist after applying the Bonferroni correction. Results are interpreted in terms of their impact on community college leaders’ efforts to retain and support minority students. In addition, considerations for future research are presented and discussed.

No description available.

No description available.