No description available.

Opioids are used routinely in the pediatric intensive care population for analgesia, sedation, blunting of physiologic responses to stress, and safety. In children, physical dependence may occur in as little as two to three days of continuous opioid therapy. Once the child no longer needs the opioid, the medications are reduced over time. A review of the literature revealed that the majority of the published studies used either a neonatal opioid assessment tool or no assessment tool. A subsequent international survey of pediatric providers found a wide range of opioid tapering practices and sporadic use of opioid withdrawal instruments to guide practice. Since tapering routines vary among practitioners, it is not uncommon to see signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal. A prospective, descriptive study was conducted to describe the frequency of opioid withdrawal signs and symptoms and to identify factors associated with these opioid withdrawal signs and symptoms. The sample of 25 was drawn from all patients, ages 2 weeks to 21 years admitted to the Children’s Hospital of Richmond Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) and who have received continuous infusion or scheduled opioids for at least 5 days. Data collected included: opioid withdrawal score (WAT-1), opioid taper rate (total dose of opioid per day in morphine equivalents per kilogram [MEK]), pretaper peak MEK, pretaper cumulative MEK, number of days of opioid exposure prior to taper, and age. Out of 26 enrolled participants, only 9 (45%) had opioid withdrawal on any given day. In addition, there was limited variability in WAT-1 scores. The most common symptoms notes were diarrhea, vomit, sweat, and fever. For optimal opioid withdrawal assessments, clinicians should use a validated instrument such as the WAT-1 to measure for signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal. Further research is indicated to examine risk factors for opioid withdrawal in children.

Trata-se de um ensaio clínico com três Grupos. Avaliaram-se os efeitos da intervenção \"Treinamento, Avaliação e Registro Sistematizado de Dor\" sobre a intensidade da dor, o consumo suplementar de morfina, o tratamento de efeitos colaterais e a satisfação com a analgesia dos doentes, no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca. Foram estudados 182 doentes, no Grupo I (GI, N=55), Grupo II (GII, N=66) e Grupo III (GIII, N=61). Todos receberam a mesma orientação pré-operatória e submeteram-se ao mesmo protocolo medicamentoso para o controle de dor e dos efeitos colaterais. No GI a equipe de enfermagem não recebeu Treinamento e realizou a avaliação da dor conforme rotina da instituição. Nos GII e GIII toda a equipe de enfermagem participou do Curso de Capacitação Sobre a Dor e Seu Controle (Treinamento). No GII a equipe de enfermagem utilizou a Ficha Sistematizada sobre Dor e seu Controle, a cada duas horas. No GIII a equipe de enfermagem não utilizou esta Ficha. Os doentes dos três Grupos também foram avaliados pela pesquisadora nas primeiras 30 horas, a cada 6 horas (6 Momentos). Os resultados foram analisados pelos testes de Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn, Friedman, Qui-quadrado e Verossimilhança. O nível de significância adotado foi de 5%. Os Grupos foram semelhantes quanto à idade, sexo, escolaridade, tipo de cirurgia, tipo de dreno e estado físico. A dor ao repouso e à tosse foi menos intensa no GII. Ao repouso observou-se diferença no Momento 2 (p=0,012) e à tosse, nos Momentos 2, 3, 4 e 6 (p=0,021, p=0,005, p=0,048 e p=0,001, respectivamente). Na dor à inspiração profunda não houve diferença intergrupos. No GII observou-se maior uso de morfina suplementar (p=0,002), maior número de doentes recebendo morfina (p=0,002) e maior média na relação dose de morfina/doente (p=0,022). O GI foi o que menos recebeu antiemético (p=0,019, Momento 2) mas teve a maior ocorrência de náusea e vômito (p=0,032, Momento 6). Prurido ocorreu somente uma vez e não houve depressão respiratória. A satisfação com a analgesia foi mais elevada no GII nos Momentos 2 e 3 (p=0,001 e p=0,012). O Treinamento associado à Ficha Sistematizada sobre a Dor e seu Controle incitou os enfermeiros a intervirem mais vezes para o ajuste da analgesia, melhorou o controle da dor e a satisfação dos doentes com a analgesia. Mostrou-se a melhor opção para o controle da dor no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca / This paper reports on a clinical trial with three Groups. The effects of the intervention \"Training, Assessment and Registration of Pain\" on pain intensity, supplementary consumption of morphine, treatment of side effects, and satisfaction with analgesia among patients in post-operative cardiac surgery. The sample were studied 182 patients, in Group I (GI, N=55), Group II (GII, N=66) and Group III (GIII, N=61). All received the same pre-operative guidelines and submitted themselves to the same medication protocol for the control of pain and its side effects. In GI, the nursing team did not receive the Training, and carried out the pain assessment according to the routine practice of the institution. In GII and GIII, all the nursing team took part in the Curso de Capacitação Sobre a Dor e Seu Controle (Training Course on Pain and its Control). In GII the nursing team used the Ficha Sistematizada sobre Dor e seu Controle (Systematized Record of Pain and its Control) every two hours. In GIII the nursing team did not use this Record. The patients in the three Groups were assessed by the researcher every 6 hours, for the first 30 hours (6 separate moments). The results were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn, Friedman, Qui-quadrado and Verossimilhança tests. The level of significance adopted was 5%. The Groups were similar, in terms of age, sex, level of education, type of surgery, type of drainage and physical state. The pain in rest and when coughing were less intense in GII. For pain in rest, a difference was observed in Moment 2 (p=0.012) and when coughing, in Moments 2, 3, 4 and 6 (p=0.021, p=0.005, p=0.048 and p=0.001, respectively). For pain on deep inspiration, there was no difference between the groups. In GII, greater use of supplementary morphine was observed (p=0.002), with a higher number of patients receiving morphine (p=0.002), and a higher average ratio of morphine dose to patient (p=0.022). GI was the group which received the least antiemetic (p=0.019, Moment 2) but had the highest occurrence of nausea and vomiting (p=0,032, Moment 6). Pruritis occurred only once, and there was no respiratory depression. Satisfaction with the analgesia was higher in GII in Moments 2 and 3 (p=0.001 and p=0.012). The Training, together with the Systematized Record of Pain and its Control led the nurses to intervene more often in adjusting the analgesia, which improved the pain control and the satisfaction of the patients with the analgesia. This proved to be the best option for the control of post-operative pain following cardiac surgery

Trata-se de um ensaio clínico com três Grupos. Avaliaram-se os efeitos da intervenção \"Treinamento, Avaliação e Registro Sistematizado de Dor\" sobre a intensidade da dor, o consumo suplementar de morfina, o tratamento de efeitos colaterais e a satisfação com a analgesia dos doentes, no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca. Foram estudados 182 doentes, no Grupo I (GI, N=55), Grupo II (GII, N=66) e Grupo III (GIII, N=61). Todos receberam a mesma orientação pré-operatória e submeteram-se ao mesmo protocolo medicamentoso para o controle de dor e dos efeitos colaterais. No GI a equipe de enfermagem não recebeu Treinamento e realizou a avaliação da dor conforme rotina da instituição. Nos GII e GIII toda a equipe de enfermagem participou do Curso de Capacitação Sobre a Dor e Seu Controle (Treinamento). No GII a equipe de enfermagem utilizou a Ficha Sistematizada sobre Dor e seu Controle, a cada duas horas. No GIII a equipe de enfermagem não utilizou esta Ficha. Os doentes dos três Grupos também foram avaliados pela pesquisadora nas primeiras 30 horas, a cada 6 horas (6 Momentos). Os resultados foram analisados pelos testes de Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn, Friedman, Qui-quadrado e Verossimilhança. O nível de significância adotado foi de 5%. Os Grupos foram semelhantes quanto à idade, sexo, escolaridade, tipo de cirurgia, tipo de dreno e estado físico. A dor ao repouso e à tosse foi menos intensa no GII. Ao repouso observou-se diferença no Momento 2 (p=0,012) e à tosse, nos Momentos 2, 3, 4 e 6 (p=0,021, p=0,005, p=0,048 e p=0,001, respectivamente). Na dor à inspiração profunda não houve diferença intergrupos. No GII observou-se maior uso de morfina suplementar (p=0,002), maior número de doentes recebendo morfina (p=0,002) e maior média na relação dose de morfina/doente (p=0,022). O GI foi o que menos recebeu antiemético (p=0,019, Momento 2) mas teve a maior ocorrência de náusea e vômito (p=0,032, Momento 6). Prurido ocorreu somente uma vez e não houve depressão respiratória. A satisfação com a analgesia foi mais elevada no GII nos Momentos 2 e 3 (p=0,001 e p=0,012). O Treinamento associado à Ficha Sistematizada sobre a Dor e seu Controle incitou os enfermeiros a intervirem mais vezes para o ajuste da analgesia, melhorou o controle da dor e a satisfação dos doentes com a analgesia. Mostrou-se a melhor opção para o controle da dor no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca / This paper reports on a clinical trial with three Groups. The effects of the intervention \"Training, Assessment and Registration of Pain\" on pain intensity, supplementary consumption of morphine, treatment of side effects, and satisfaction with analgesia among patients in post-operative cardiac surgery. The sample were studied 182 patients, in Group I (GI, N=55), Group II (GII, N=66) and Group III (GIII, N=61). All received the same pre-operative guidelines and submitted themselves to the same medication protocol for the control of pain and its side effects. In GI, the nursing team did not receive the Training, and carried out the pain assessment according to the routine practice of the institution. In GII and GIII, all the nursing team took part in the Curso de Capacitação Sobre a Dor e Seu Controle (Training Course on Pain and its Control). In GII the nursing team used the Ficha Sistematizada sobre Dor e seu Controle (Systematized Record of Pain and its Control) every two hours. In GIII the nursing team did not use this Record. The patients in the three Groups were assessed by the researcher every 6 hours, for the first 30 hours (6 separate moments). The results were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn, Friedman, Qui-quadrado and Verossimilhança tests. The level of significance adopted was 5%. The Groups were similar, in terms of age, sex, level of education, type of surgery, type of drainage and physical state. The pain in rest and when coughing were less intense in GII. For pain in rest, a difference was observed in Moment 2 (p=0.012) and when coughing, in Moments 2, 3, 4 and 6 (p=0.021, p=0.005, p=0.048 and p=0.001, respectively). For pain on deep inspiration, there was no difference between the groups. In GII, greater use of supplementary morphine was observed (p=0.002), with a higher number of patients receiving morphine (p=0.002), and a higher average ratio of morphine dose to patient (p=0.022). GI was the group which received the least antiemetic (p=0.019, Moment 2) but had the highest occurrence of nausea and vomiting (p=0,032, Moment 6). Pruritis occurred only once, and there was no respiratory depression. Satisfaction with the analgesia was higher in GII in Moments 2 and 3 (p=0.001 and p=0.012). The Training, together with the Systematized Record of Pain and its Control led the nurses to intervene more often in adjusting the analgesia, which improved the pain control and the satisfaction of the patients with the analgesia. This proved to be the best option for the control of post-operative pain following cardiac surgery