Examensarbete.

Submitted by Kamila Costa (kamilavasconceloscosta@gmail.com) on 2015-08-25T13:04:18Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação - Elaine C O F Archanjo.pdf: 2848475 bytes, checksum: dfa280ff139b9fef19dd24d27f73fb28 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Divisão de Documentação/BC Biblioteca Central (ddbc@ufam.edu.br) on 2015-08-26T19:07:20Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação - Elaine C O F Archanjo.pdf: 2848475 bytes, checksum: dfa280ff139b9fef19dd24d27f73fb28 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Divisão de Documentação/BC Biblioteca Central (ddbc@ufam.edu.br) on 2015-08-26T19:16:23Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação - Elaine C O F Archanjo.pdf: 2848475 bytes, checksum: dfa280ff139b9fef19dd24d27f73fb28 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-08-26T19:16:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertação - Elaine C O F Archanjo.pdf: 2848475 bytes, checksum: dfa280ff139b9fef19dd24d27f73fb28 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-06-22 / CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / This paper aims at the struggle of the Boa Vista Quilombo reminiscence community, located in the Trombetas River, municipality of Oriximiná for their ownership of land, according to the article 68 of ADCT of the 1988 Constitution. It has sought by the social memory, the oral narratives of community inhabitants, to analyze the historical process of the Boa Vista Quilombola community formation for the labors, men and women striving from that location. It also has searched to comprehend how these subjects register historically their experiences and life trajectories on struggle for land evidencing either the enclusure process or the genesis of the quilombola movement of trombetas and their social and political confrontation and finally to analyze the organization around its identity of Quilombo reminiscent. The methodology of the oral History is the theoretical support which it has given sustainment to this study. Boa Vista was the first Quilombo reminiscent community recognized and represented in Brazil and its organizational pattern will be used for other communities. At the end of the study it has established along its history, the Boa Vista community faced clashes which expressed as expropriation, struggles and contestation for right of permanency and uses of the areas, new regulations and rules. From the expropriation actions which was submitted the Quilombola community of Boa Vista, it resulted the subtraction of a large part of the territory historically occupied, losing its work, leisure and memory spaces, besides the survival guarantee by proper ways of each way of life. / Este estudo versa sobre a luta da comunidade remanescente de quilombo Boa Vista, localizado no rio Trombetas, município de Oriximiná, para titulação de suas terras, com base no artigo 68 do ADCT da Constituição de 1988. Buscou-se por meio da memória social, as narrativas orais de moradores da comunidade, analisar o processo histórico de formação da comunidade quilombola de Boa Vista pela luta de trabalhadores, homens e mulheres daquela localidade. Procurou-se compreender como esses sujeitos historicizam suas experiências e trajetórias de vida na luta pela terra, evidenciando o processo de cercamento, bem como a gênese do movimento quilombola do Trombetas e suas estratégias de enfrentamento social e política e por fim analisar a organização entorno de sua identidade de Remanescente de Quilombo. A metodologia da História Oral é o aporte teórico que deu sustentação a este estudo. Boa Vista foi à primeira comunidade remanescente de Quilombo reconhecida e titulada no Brasil e seu modelo de organização será utilizado por outras comunidades. Ao finalizar o estudo constatou-se que, ao longo de sua história, a comunidade de Boa Vista enfrentou conflitos que se manifestaram sob a forma de expropriações, de luta e contestação pelo direito de permanência e usos das áreas, de novas regras e normas. Das ações expropriadoras, a qual foi submetida à comunidade quilombola de Boa Vista, resultou a subtração de grande parte do território historicamente ocupado, perdendo seu espaço de trabalho, lazer e de lembranças, além da garantia de sobrevivência por meios próprios de todo um modo de vida.

Thesis (MBA (Business Management))--University of Stellenbosch, 2007. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Grondhervorming en dit wat daarmee gepaard gaan, is een van die hoekstene van die normalisering van ons samelewing en is sedert 1994 deel van die transformasieproses. Die huidige regering gaan uit van die oortuiging dat blywende vrede nie verkry kan word sonder dat dié ongelykhede reggestel word nie. Is daar ‘n antwoord op Suid-Afrika se ongelyke grondbesit, en kan kontrakboerdery 'n rol speel in die oorbrugging van die probleme? Een van die belangrikste aspekte van die regstelling van die ongeregtighede van die verlede, is die uitwissing van armoede, en in hierdie verband is Landbou 'n belangrike rolspeler. Ten einde armoede te bestry en werk te skep, moet die toekomstige generasie bemagtig word deur eienaarskap te versprei. Die Wet op Inheemse Grond van 1913, die Inheemse Trust- en Grondwet van 1936, en die Groepsgebiedewet van 1950 het swart Suid-Afrikaners die geleentheid ontneem om plaaseenhede te besit en te bedryf in die blanke gebiede van Suid- Afrika wat, soos ons almal weet, verreweg die grootste gedeelte van die land asook die meer produktiewe boerderygrond uitgemaak het. Die grondhervormingsproses streef om die erfenis van hierdie wette ongedaan te maak. Sedert die Suid-Afrikaanse grondhervormingsprogram in 1994 van stapel gestuur is, heers daar groot debat oor die beleid, implementeringstrategieë en die impak van sodanige pogings op landbougrond, die lewens van die bevoordeeldes, en die Suid-Afrikaanse ekonomie. Met die toename in skaal en kompleksiteit van grondhervorming het dit al hoe moeiliker vir die Regering geword om die proses te monitor en te evalueer. Dit is nou alombekend dat, behalwe vir kwantitatiewe aanwysings, daar baie leemtes bestaan in die inligting oor grondhervorming. In die lig van die veranderende aard van wêreld-landbou- en voedselmarkte en die voortspruitende behoefte vir vertikale integrasie van die voedselverskaffingskettings, het hierdie werkstuk ten doel om die rol van kontrakboerdery as 'n instelling te ondersoek, ten einde die voortgesette deelname te verseker van kleinboere in ontwikkelende lande in die markte vir hoëwaarde produkte. Die klem val spesifiek op die Suid-Afrikaanse omstandighede vir grondhervorming. Die werkstuk bespreek die teoretiese rasionaal van kontrakboerdery, en illustreer hoe dié vorm van boerdery aangewend kan word om markmislukkings en a-simmetriese informasieprobleme te oorkom. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Land reform and associated matters are some of the cornerstones of the normalizing of our society and have been part of the transformation process since 1994. The present regime is of the conviction that lasting peace cannot be achieved without such unequalities being addressed. Is there an answer to unequal ownership of land in South Africa, and can contract farming play a role in bridging these problems? One of the most important aspects of the unrighteousness of the past, is poverty and in its eradication, agriculture is an important role player. In order to combat poverty and create jobs, the future generation must be empowered by ownership of the economy. The Indigenous Land Act of 1913, The Indigenous Trust and Land Act of 1936, and the Group Areas Act of 1950 deprived Black South Africans of the opportunity to own and run farming units within the white areas of South Africa that, as we all know, formed by far the largest part of the land as well as the more productive farming land. The land reformation process strives to annul the legacy of those laws. Since the South African land reform program was started in 1994, a heated debate has raged about the policy, implementation stategies, and impact of such efforts on agricultural land, the lives of the beneficiaries, and the South African economy. With the increase in scale and complexity of land reform, it became more and more difficult for the regime to monitor and evaluate the process. It is now common knowledge that, except for qualitative indications, many shortcomings are apparent in the information on land reform. In light of the changing nature of world agricultural and food markets and the subsequent need for vertical integration of the food-supply chains, this study aims at investigating the role of contract farming as an institution, in order to ensure the continued participation of small farmers in developing countries in the markets for high-value products. The emphasis falls specifically on the South African conditions for land reform. This study describes the theoretical rationale of contract farming, and illustrates how this form of farming can be applied to overcome market fiascos and assimmetrical information problems.

Submitted by SBI Biblioteca Digital (sbi.bibliotecadigital@puc-campinas.edu.br) on 2018-04-10T17:35:10Z No. of bitstreams: 1 BRUNA PIMENTEL CILENTO.pdf: 6007213 bytes, checksum: ced9e5af3462d6b233c339854f8c380e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-04-10T17:35:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 BRUNA PIMENTEL CILENTO.pdf: 6007213 bytes, checksum: ced9e5af3462d6b233c339854f8c380e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-12-12 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica de Campinas - PUC - Campinas / This study seeks to expose the urban land regularization of social interest proposed by Federal Law n?. 11.977/09 (BRAZIL, 2009), which used the instruments: urban demarcation and ownership legitimacy as a strategy to standardize and disrupt the processes of settlement of low-income populations so that these occurred with greater agility. Despite the positive results presented in the cases studied, such as the de-adjudication of the recognition of tenure and the growth of titling records, land regularization procedures remain time-consuming and facilitating titling of the possessor more than promoting a decent - and free from socio-spatial segregation - urbanization. This situation is further aggravated by the attitude of the political-administrative management of municipalities that do not adequately supervise the use and occupation of urban land, acting in accordance with private interests and with connivance in relation to the illegal practices of landowners irregularly soil division/parceled. In a new national political scenario, despite the advances and difficulties faced, rises a new regulatory framework for urban land regularization, Law n?. 13.465 / 2017 (BRAZIL, 2017), which revoked Law n? 11.977/09 (BRAZIL, 2009), further destabilizing the current environmental urban land regularization of social interest in Brazil, for bringing legal uncertainty as to the manner of its application. In this context are at strife the interests of the poor working-class- who live in informality and segregated access to the formal city and its public services and equipment -, and the patrimonialist interests among the state - which maintains with those who live in illegality a dysfunctional relationship based on the politics of partiality, typical of "political clientelism" (MARICATO, 2014) - helping perpetuating the ideology of socio-excluding domination, in favor of maintaining the circumstance of the accumulation of privileges in the hands of a minority. / Este estudio expone la Regularizaci?n Fundiaria Urbana de inter?s social propuesta por la Ley Federal n? 11.977/09 (BRASIL, 2009), que se vali? de los instrumentos de la demarcaci?n urban?stica y legitimaci?n de posesi?n como estrategia para uniformizar y desjudicializar los procesos de regularizaci?n de asentamientos compuestos por las poblaciones de bajos ingresos, de forma que ocurrecen con mayor agilidad. A pesar de los resultados positivos presentados en los casos estudiados, como la desjudicializaci?n del reconocimiento de la posesi?n y el crecimiento de registros de titulaci?n, los procedimientos de regularizaci?n de la tierra urbana siguen tardandose, facilitando m?s la titulaci?n del poseedor que la promoci?n de una urbanizaci?n digna y libre de la segregaci?n socioespacial. Este cuadro es agravado por la postura de las gestiones pol?tico-administrativas de los municipios que no fiscalizan adecuadamente el uso y ocupaci?n del suelo urbano, actuando de acuerdo con intereses particulares y conniventes con las pr?cticas ilegales de los due?os de las tierras parceladas irregularmente. En un nuevo escenario pol?tico nacional, a pesar de los avances y de las dificultades enfrentadas, surge un nuevo marco regulatorio de la Regularizaci?n Fundi?ria Urbana, Ley n? 13.465 (BRASIL, 2017), que revoc? la Ley n? 11.977/09 (BRASIL, 2009), desestabilizando a?n m?s la coyuntura en que se encuentra la regularizaci?n fundi?ria urbana de inter?s social em Brazil. En este contexto est?n en disputa los intereses de la clase pobre trabajadora, que vive en la informalidad y segregada del acceso a la ciudad formal y sus servicios y equipamientos p?blicos, y los intereses patrimonialistas del estado, que mantiene con los que viven en la ilegalidad una relaci?n disfuncional, en la pol?tica del favor, propia del "clientelismo pol?tico" (MARICATO, 2014), el cual ayuda a perpetuar la ideolog?a de dominaci?n socioexcluyente en favor del mantenimiento del status quo de la acumulaci?n de privilegios en las manos de una minor?a. / Este estudo exp?e a Regulariza??o Fundi?ria Urbana de interesse social proposta pela Lei Federal n? 11.977/09 (BRASIL, 2009), que se valeu dos instrumentos da demarca??o urban?stica e legitima??o de posse como estrat?gia para uniformizar e desjudicializar os processos de regulariza??o de assentamentos compostos por popula??es de baixa renda, de forma que ocorressem com maior agilidade. Apesar dos resultados positivos apresentados nos casos estudados, como a desjudicializa??o do reconhecimento da posse e o crescimento de registros de titula??o, os procedimentos de regulariza??o fundi?ria ainda permanecem demorados, facilitando mais a titula??o do possuidor do que a promo??o de uma urbaniza??o digna e livre da segrega??o socioespacial. Esse quadro ? ainda mais agravado pela postura das gest?es pol?tico-administrativas dos munic?pios que n?o fiscalizam adequadamente o uso e ocupa??o do solo urbano, agindo de acordo com interesses particulares e coniventes com as pr?ticas ilegais dos donos das terras parceladas irregularmente. Em um novo cen?rio pol?tico nacional, apesar dos avan?os e das dificuldades enfrentadas, surge um novo marco regulat?rio da Regulariza??o Fundi?ria Urbana, Lei n? 13.465 (BRASIL, 2017), que revogou a Lei n? 11.977/09 (BRASIL, 2009), desestabilizando ainda mais a conjuntura em que se encontra a Regulariza??o Fundi?ria Urbana de interesse social no Brasil, por trazer inseguran?a jur?dica quanto ? forma de sua aplica??o. Nesse contexto est?o em disputa os interesses da classe pobre trabalhadora, que vive na informalidade e segregada do acesso ? cidade formal e seus servi?os e equipamentos p?blicos, e os interesses patrimonialistas do estado, que mant?m com os que vivem na ilegalidade uma rela??o disfuncional, baseada na pol?tica do favor, pr?pria do ?clientelismo pol?tico? (MARICATO, 2014), o qual ajuda a perpetuar a ideologia de domina??o socioexcludente em prol da manuten??o do status quo da acumula??o de privil?gios nas m?os de uma minoria.