<p><strong>Purpose:</strong> The main purpose of this study is to study the 45 funds, divided into three differentdivisions, then the result will provide a greater understanding of how returns change with ahigher risk.</p><p><strong>Methodology:</strong> The study is based on a quantitative approach. The survey was conducted bygathering raw data from databases and secondary data from literature, printed and electronicsources.</p><p><strong>Theoretical perspectives:</strong> The study is based on the theory: the efficient markethypothesis, which argues that future returns can not be calculated as the market is fullyinformed. The study is therefore studying historical yields.</p><p><strong>Empirical foundation:</strong> Empirical data are acquired from www.morningstar.se, andtherefore also treated on this page. The material is then divided into documents and time axes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The study has shown that high-risk funds give a higher percentage returns thanmedium-and low-risk funds. However, does not imply a higher risk automatically earn ahigher return when the low-risk funds have shown a higher yield than medium-risk funds. Animportant factor to study when you are looking for the fund which generated the highest ROIis the Sharpe ratio. Although this study demonstrates that high-risk funds have a higherSharpe ratio than competing risk groups.</p>

Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to study the 45 funds, divided into three differentdivisions, then the result will provide a greater understanding of how returns change with ahigher risk. Methodology: The study is based on a quantitative approach. The survey was conducted bygathering raw data from databases and secondary data from literature, printed and electronicsources. Theoretical perspectives: The study is based on the theory: the efficient markethypothesis, which argues that future returns can not be calculated as the market is fullyinformed. The study is therefore studying historical yields. Empirical foundation: Empirical data are acquired from www.morningstar.se, andtherefore also treated on this page. The material is then divided into documents and time axes. Conclusions: The study has shown that high-risk funds give a higher percentage returns thanmedium-and low-risk funds. However, does not imply a higher risk automatically earn ahigher return when the low-risk funds have shown a higher yield than medium-risk funds. Animportant factor to study when you are looking for the fund which generated the highest ROIis the Sharpe ratio. Although this study demonstrates that high-risk funds have a higherSharpe ratio than competing risk groups.

Bakgrund &amp; Problemformulering: Momentumeffekten på fondmarknaden är ett relativt outforskat område där dess existens på senare tid har blivit omtvistad. Eftersom kunskapen om pensionssparande och det svenska pensionssystemet är låg, samtidigt som de sociala skyddsnäten i samhället minskar är det viktigt att undersöka om momentumstrategier kan ge överavkastning för privatpersoners pensionssparande. Således ställs frågan: Kan momentumstrategier skapa överavkastning på fondmarknaden? Syfte: Syftet med uppsatsen är att undersöka momentumeffekten på fondmarknaden och om momentumstrategier kan utnyttjas av svenska pensionssparare för att skapa överavkastning i PPM-systemet. Metod: Uppsatsen har ett kvantitativt tillvägagångssätt och en deduktiv utgångspunkt tillämpas. För att undersöka momentumeffekten på fondmarknaden tillämpas en multipel regressionsanalys med Fama French-Trefaktormodell, samt Sharpekvot. Uppsatsens urval är PPM-fonder under perioden 2010-2017. Slutsatser: Uppsatsen finner inget statistiskt stöd för en momentumeffekt på fondmarknaden genom Fama French-Trefaktormodell. Detta är ett tecken på att fondmarknaden kan vara svagt effektiv då historisk information inte har kunnat användas för att skapa riskjusterad överavkastning. Uppsatsen finner således ingen momentumeffekt för fondmarknaden efter finanskrisen 2008, trots att en momentumeffekt har kunnat påvisas dessförinnan inom tidigare forskning. Med hänsyn till det har författarna anledning att misstänka att marknadens effektivitet kan variera, vilket skulle kunna förklaras av den Adaptiva Marknadshypotesen. / Background &amp; Problem: The momentum effect in the fund market is relatively unexplored were its existence has been controversial. Due to the lack of knowledge in retirement savings and the Swedish Premium Pension Agency system, alongside the weakening of a social safety net, it is important to examine if momentum strategies give excess returns and can be used for retirement savings. Therefore, the authors question: Do momentum strategies give excess returns in the fund market? Purpose: The aim of the thesis is to examine the momentum effect in the fund market and if momentum strategies can be used to create excess return in the Premium Pension Agency system. Method: The thesis takes a deductive research approach with a quantitative methodology. To examine the momentum effect in the fund market, a multiple regression analysis model from Fama French-Three factor model is applied, and the Sharpe ratio. The sample for the study is Swedish Premium Pension Agency funds, which is examined over the period of 2010-2017. Conclusions: The thesis does not find support for a momentum effect in the fund market through the Fama French-Three factor model. This indicates that the fund market is weak form efficient, as historical information cannot be used to create risk adjusted excess return. Thus, the thesis does not find a momentum effect for the fund market after the financial crisis in 2008, even though a momentum effect is proven to exist before then. In view of this, the authors have reason to suspect the market efficiency to vary, which could be explained by the Adaptive Market Hypothesis.