Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2016-01-22T11:38:29Z No. of bitstreams: 1 TES_MAURICIO_MARTINS_REIS_PARCIAL.pdf: 449656 bytes, checksum: e05ccdc237109adfb48828ef39f704d0 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-01-22T11:38:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 TES_MAURICIO_MARTINS_REIS_PARCIAL.pdf: 449656 bytes, checksum: e05ccdc237109adfb48828ef39f704d0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-12-18 / This research is in charge of responding whether philosophical hermeneutics, which became autonomous within the framework of the thought of Hans-Georg Gadamer the claim of universality of the hermeneutical problem attribute, may be qualified as genuine philosophy. The underlying theme of the thesis covers the main features of Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics in order to promote a kind of internal criticism about its corresponding assumptions, especially those that revolve around the universal primacy of the historicity of understanding. It advocates the need to counteract against the transcendental horizon of meaning, significantly accentuated by philosophical hermeneutics through the incidence of historical understanding that runs through each interpretation about the world, the transcendental horizon of normative validity, responsible for critical and reflective bypass any thought that title itself as legitimately philosophical. In these terms, hermeneutics as philosophy, to achieve the desired universality platform, must claim at the same time the substrate of normative rationality validation, so as not to incur into a kind of ontological hypertrophy, acting just like a redundant substitute hermeneutics of Heidegger's philosophy. Furthermore, philosophical hermeneutics should resist, with equal caution of self-criticism, in stimulating too much of this counterpart reflective validity in order to challenge the arrogant place able to propel the verdict of the final word or the last intransitively foundation considered as an ultimate point of view, behold the assumption of its universality stands on the critical path of the metaphysical finitude, that is, on the horizon of a program stripped of absolute or totalitarian overtones. / Trata a presente investiga??o de responder se a hermen?utica filos?fica, autonomizada nos marcos do pensamento de Hans-Georg Gadamer pela reivindica??o do atributo da universalidade do problema hermen?utico, pode ser qualificada genuinamente como filosofia. O fio condutor da tese percorre as principais caracter?sticas da hermen?utica filos?fica gadameriana com a finalidade de promover uma esp?cie de cr?tica interna a partir dos correspondentes pressupostos, especialmente os que giram em torno do primado universal da historicidade da compreens?o. Preconiza-se a necessidade de contrapor ao horizonte transcendental de sentido, significativamente acentuado pela hermen?utica filos?fica pela incid?ncia da compreens?o hist?rica que atravessa toda e qualquer interpreta??o acerca do mundo, o horizonte transcendental de validade normativa, respons?vel pela deriva??o cr?tica e reflexiva de qualquer pensamento que se intitule como legitimamente filos?fico. Nesses termos, a hermen?utica enquanto filosofia, para alcan?ar-se na pretendida plataforma de universalidade, precisa reivindicar concomitantemente o substrato da racionalidade normativa de valida??o, de maneira a n?o incorrer na hipertrofia do ontol?gico, como se fosse um substitutivo redundante da filosofia hermen?utica de Heidegger. Ademais, a hermen?utica filos?fica dever? resistir-se, com igual prud?ncia de autocr?tica, no est?mulo demasiado desta contrapartida de validade reflexiva, de maneira a contestar o lugar arrogante capaz de impulsionar o veredicto da palavra final ou da fundamenta??o ?ltima intransitivamente considerada como derradeiro crit?rio, eis que a assun??o de sua universalidade se sobressai no caminho cr?tico da metaf?sica da finitude, isto ?, no horizonte de um programa despido de conota??o absoluta ou totalit?ria.