Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2016-06-10T16:37:24Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DIS_FELIPE_WAQUIL_FERRARO_PARCIAL.pdf: 380164 bytes, checksum: c97ad494e35f29c3ff8674f723e68f81 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-10T16:37:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DIS_FELIPE_WAQUIL_FERRARO_PARCIAL.pdf: 380164 bytes, checksum: c97ad494e35f29c3ff8674f723e68f81 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-02-29 / Television is a specific form of cultural expression of a particular people. In this sense, the influence of the television and American movies in the rest of the world is overwhelming, with a reference to the public and society in general. This influence can also be seen in the legal world. American cinemas are rich in films with courts in which lawyers masterfully dominate the causes, the evidence, the witnesses and the jury. It has also, throughout the North American legal culture shown on tv series, that are broadcast in several countries. Thus, it is huge the influence of television on the culture of a society, which has often clients leaving of an audience really disappointed because the lawyer didn?t won the case, not constrains the other party to give up the case or did not show all his oratory to the judge. Finally, at the end of an ordinary audience of Civil Law, still hears "It's that all, counselor?" In this regard, the appeal by the shock, characteristic of the Common Law system, deserves a detailed analysis. This analysis will be done from the testimonial evidence. Thus, this dissertation aims to verify the contrast between Brazilian Law (Civil Law) and the US Law (Common Law), as well, the elements which approach and contrast them, especially about the testimonial evidence, specifically in its rules exclusion and valuation systems. Therefore, we?ll see, the systematic structure of the Law of the United States, starting from the Constitution (Bill of Rights), passing by federal rules (Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Federal Rules of Evidence) to the traditional issues such as exclusion rules and the civil jury. Then, we will analyze the problem of studying distinct systems as Civil Law and Common Law, knowing that it allows us a wide view of the elements that distinguish them. In this regard, we have the investigation of orality in the US Common Law system, in front of the jury figure and the form of inquiry and influence witnesses. Therefore, we?ll see the exclusion rules and the assessment of the evidence based on the US legal system, as also, see the absolute need for a proper understanding of evidentiary standards. At the end, you can not only see the influence of American law, but also understand their particularities, pros and cons, across the Brazilian law. / A televis?o ? uma forma de express?o cultural espec?fica de um determinado povo. E nesse sentido, a influ?ncia da televis?o e do cinema americano no resto do mundo ? avassaladora, sendo uma refer?ncia para o p?blico e a sociedade de um modo geral. Tal influ?ncia tamb?m se verifica no mundo jur?dico. O cinema estadunidense ? riqu?ssimo em filmes de tribunais em que advogados com maestria dominam ?s causas, as provas, os testemunhos e o j?ri. Tem-se tamb?m, toda a cultura jur?dica norte americana mostrada em seriados, os quais s?o transmitidos em diversos pa?ses do mundo. Dessa forma, tamanha ? a influ?ncia da televis?o sobre a cultura de uma sociedade, que n?o raras vezes clientes saem decepcionados de uma audi?ncia, pois seu advogado n?o ganhou a causa naquele momento, n?o constrangeu a outra parte a desistir do processo, n?o demonstrou todo sua orat?ria perante o juiz da causa. E ao final de uma ordin?ria audi?ncia de Civil Law, ainda se ouve ?Mas ? s? isso doutor??. Nesse aspecto, o encanto pelos embates pr?prios do sistema do Common Law, merece uma an?lise pormenorizada. An?lise, esta, feita a partir da prova testemunhal. Assim, a presente disserta??o tem por objetivo verificar, diante da contraposi??o entre o Direito brasileiro (Civil Law) e o Direto estadunidense (Common Law), os elementos que lhes aproxima e os que lhes contrastam, no que cinge a prova testemunhal, especificamente nas suas regras de exclus?o e sistemas de valora??o. Visualiza-se, para tanto, a estrutura sistem?tica do Direito dos Estados Unidos da Am?rica, partindo de sua Constitui??o (Bill of Rights), perpassando pelas regras federais (Federal Rules of Civil Procedure e Federal Rules of Evidence) at? as quest?es tradicionais como as regras de exclus?o e da figura do j?ri c?vel. Verificar-se-?, assim, a problem?tica do estudo de distintos sistemas, como Civil Law e Common Law, mas que possibilitar? uma ampla vis?o dos elementos que lhes distinguem. Tem-se, nesse aspecto, a averigua??o da oralidade no sistema do Common Law estadunidense frente ? figura do j?ri e ? forma de inquiri??o e influ?ncia das testemunhas. Por conseguinte, examinar-se-?o as regras de exclus?o, bem como a valora??o das provas com base no sistema legal estadunidense, al?m da imprescindibilidade de uma compreens?o adequada dos standards probat?rios. Ao final, ser? poss?vel verificar, n?o s? a influ?ncia do Direito estadunidense, mas entender suas particularidades, pontos positivos e negativos, frente ao Direito brasileiro.

Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T14:34:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 453001.pdf: 307365 bytes, checksum: 8bd8c17b41a885367a6eaa2af5aeb17c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-06-28 / In the procedural system current stage a collision between the effectiveness constitutional principle and timeliness constitutional principle may occur. While the first has a goal of providing all parties with the necessary means to pursue the concretization of substantive law in the phenomenon world, the second principle objective is to ensure that legal protection measures take place within a reasonable timeframe in agreement to what the controversy solution needs. Based on the assumption that in most concrete circumstances the execution of effective provision for judicial review is untimely, is the intention to defend a judicial centre-piece idea in which realization of law in the phenomenon world can happen along reasonable timeframes. The present dissertation , had by its objective, therefore, to conciliate those two fundamental standards in a probative extent, while increasing both importance of presentation of proof that attend oral procedure principles and the evaluation of a given proof that fulfill basic construction elements needed for a logical justification. If a judge mediation considering all parties and proof can lead to a more timeliness procedure, which delivers a degree of justice with better factual knowledge and higher material effectiveness towards legal protection, in the same manner, increase the importance of a proof that is supported by clear and powerful justification, provides a more practical understanding to all involved, helping one to comprehend why a given probative thesis was chosen, offering them effective jurisdictional provision and at the same time, timeliness. A procedure that models itself in the effectiveness and timeliness of jurisdictional provision, favoring oral proceeding and the decision, as ways of establish law in the phenomenon plan, allow the legitimacy of ordinary judgments and therefore, a full review when receiving the appeal, as a rule, in its double effect. / Poder? haver, no atual est?gio de sistema processual, uma colis?o entre o princ?pio constitucional da efetividade e o princ?pio constitucional da tempestividade. Enquanto aquele visa a conferir ?s partes os meios necess?rios ? possibilidade de concretiza??o do direito material no mundo fenom?nico, este tem por objetivo que a tutela jurisdicional seja prestada em tempo justific?vel ? solu??o da controv?rsia. Partindo do pressuposto de que, na maior parte das circunst?ncias concretas, a efetiva??o pr?tica da presta??o jurisdicional se d? de forma efetiva e intempestiva, pretendeu-se defender a ideia basilar de que a realiza??o do direito, no mundo fenomenol?gico dentro de um prazo razo?vel, ? poss?vel. A presente disserta??o teve por objetivo, portanto, conciliar esses dois c?nones fundamentais no ?mbito probat?rio, valorizando tanto a produ??o da prova que atenda aos ditames de um processo oral, quanto a avalia??o da prova que preencha os elementos necess?rios ? constru??o de uma justificativa racional. Se a imedia??o do juiz com as partes e com a prova tende a conferir um processo mais tempestivo, proporcionando um grau de justi?a, de cogni??o f?tica melhor, com maior efetividade material ? tutela jurisdicional, do mesmo modo, uma valora??o da prova que calhe em uma justificativa clara e contundente, possibilitando ?s partes compreender o porqu? de determinada tese probat?ria ter sido escolhida, oferece a elas efetividade no provimento jurisdicional e, ao mesmo tempo, tempestividade. Um processo que se espelhe na efetividade e na tempestividade da presta??o jurisdicional, privilegiando a oralidade e a decis?o como forma de concretiza??o do direito no plano fenom?nico, permite a legitima??o dos ju?zos ordin?rios e, com isso, a revis?o no recebimento do recurso de apela??o, como regra, no duplo efeito.

Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2015-07-01T21:39:08Z No. of bitstreams: 1 471592 - Texto Parcial.pdf: 10525571 bytes, checksum: 3dfa1e49490930c6ae6c463a0623a5e6 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-07-01T21:39:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 471592 - Texto Parcial.pdf: 10525571 bytes, checksum: 3dfa1e49490930c6ae6c463a0623a5e6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-04-30 / This work was developed during the Criminal Sciences Master's Degree undertaken at the Graduate Program in Criminal Sciences of the Law Faculty at the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, and it is linked to the Criminal Violence System concentration area and to the Contemporary Criminal Legal Systems research line. The study carried out here aimed to analyze the right one has to not produce evidence against himself and its application in drunk driving evidence. In the first chapter, aspects of criminal policy related to traffic violence are addressed, emphasizing the drunken driving offense, as well as the failure of the criminal law as means of control for the problems in today's society, such as the numerous cases of dead and wounded people on the Brazilian streets and roads. In a second step, the study goes through the provided items of proof in Art. 306 Brazilian Traffic Code ? drunk driving, as per the drafting given by the Law 12,760 / 2012, ascertaining from the general concept of evidence, through its features; the dependence or not of the accuser?s cooperation for their production, the necessity of intervention from ?corporal?, to finally analyze in detail the means of proof for the drunken driving offense configuration. The third and final chapter analyzes the principle of nemo tenetur se detegere, its origin and reception in the legal system, as a fundamental right, including the consideration of the unconstitutionality of evidence for the drunkennessconfirmation, based on the prevalent application of the nemo tenetur se detegere principle. / A presente disserta??o foi desenvolvida durante o curso de Mestrado realizado junto ao Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Criminais da Faculdade de Direito da Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, e vincula-se ? ?rea de Concentra??o: Sistema Penal e Viol?ncia e ? Linha de Pesquisa: Sistemas Jur?dicos Penais Contempor?neos. O estudo aqui realizado visa analisar o direito a n?o produzir prova contra si mesmo e sua aplica??o aos meios de prova do delito de embriaguez ao volante. No primeiro cap?tulo, s?o abordados aspectos da pol?tica criminal relacionados ? viol?ncia no tr?nsito, com ?nfase no delito de embriaguez ao volante, bem como a fal?ncia do direito penal como meio de controle para os graves problemas existentes na sociedade atual, como ? o caso da legi?o de mortos e feridos nas ruas e estradas brasileiras. Em um segundo momento, o trabalho perpassa pelos meios probat?rios previstos nos par?grafos do Art. 306 do C?digo de Tr?nsito Brasileiro ? embriaguez ao volante, conforme a reda??o que lhe deu a Lei 12.760/2012, apreciando, desde o conceito geral das provas, passando por suas caracter?sticas; depend?ncia ou n?o da coopera??o do acusado para sua produ??o, necessidade de interven??o corporal para, por fim, analisar detalhadamente os meios probat?rios necess?rios ? configura??o do delito de embriaguez ao volante.No terceiro e ?ltimo cap?tulo, ? analisado o princ?pio do nemo tenetur se detegere, sua origem e recep??o no ordenamento jur?dico, como direito fundamental, incluindo o exame da inconstitucionalidade dos meios de prova para constata??o da embriaguez, fundamentada na aplica??o prevalente do princ?pio do nemo tenetur se detegere.