A hydraulic model was developed to determine differences in the hydraulic characteristics of three different reaches of an urban- and agriculturally-impacted stream in southwest Virginia. The three reaches all had cattle excluded from the channel in 2010. The farthest upstream, Treatment 1, was left to progress without intervention beyond cattle removal while the other two, Treatments 2 and 3, were regraded and stabilized using common stream restoration techniques and a forested riparian was established. The banks of Treatment 2 were regraded to a slope of 3:1 while Treatment 3 was designed with a flat inset floodplain cut into the banks. The model results showed that the self-adjustment in Treatment 1 exhibited inset floodplains with diverse topographical structure including floodplain channels. These adjustments provided higher floodplain volume and mass exchange between the channel and the floodplain when compared with the stable, straight Treatment 2. Comparisons between Treatment 1 and Treatment 3 did not clearly show which treatment was more well connected, with some metrics showing Treatment 1 was more connected while others indicated the opposite. Overall, the findings indicate that stabilization of channelized streams without consideration of the natural planform prolongs adjustment to a channel-floodplain form with more exchange of water, sediment, nutrients and providing refuge for biota. / Master of Science / A water flow model was developed to determine differences in between sections with different management practices an urban- and agriculturally-impacted stream in southwest Virginia. The three reaches all had cattle excluded from the channel in 2010. The farthest upstream, Treatment 1, was left to progress without intervention beyond cattle removal while the other two, Treatments 2 and 3, were stabilized by changing the bank slope and planting trees. The banks of Treatment 2 were regraded to a slope of 3:1 while Treatment 3 was designed with a flat section cut into the banks. The model results showed that the self-adjustment in Treatment 1 created an bench similar to Treatment 3. This section flooded more readily and allowed for higher flow of water between the channel and the floodplain when compared with the stable, straight Treatment 2. Comparisons between Treatment 1 and Treatment 3 did not clearly show which treatment was more well connected, with some metrics showing Treatment 1 was more connected while others indicated the opposite. Overall, the findings indicate that stabilization of channelized streams in their man altered state prolongs adjustment to a more natural form which provides services including flood mitigation, sediment cycling, nutrient cycling and habitat for plants and animals in and along the stream.

Soft-sediment ecosystems can be degraded through anthropogenic development, leading to reduced habitat suitability for biological communities. On the North Coast of British Columbia, Canada, intensive industrial activity and coastal development has occurred, specifically around the Skeena and Kitimat River Estuaries. In addition to current development, both regions have the potential for further development, while also undergoing passive restoration from historical disturbances. Therefore, I aimed to broaden our understanding of passive restoration and non-invasive monitoring of intertidal soft-sediment ecosystems, by carrying out experiments at mudflats in both estuaries during the summer of 2017. Specifically, I aimed to expand the use of a non-invasive population assessment technique to novel species in soft-sediment ecosystems. Relationships between burrowing decapod abundance and burrow openings have been successfully used to estimate population sizes, but this technique has yet to be applied to large burrowing polychaetes, bivalves, or in regions of high macrofaunal diversity. As such, I assessed mudflats in regions of low (n = 1 species) and high (n = 8 species) biodiversity to determine if macrofauna abundances could be estimated from burrow openings on the sediment surface. Where only one burrowing bivalve species was present, a relationship between burrow openings and population abundance was not feasible, but burrow openings were useful in estimating total macrofaunal community abundance at a high diversity mudflat. This suggests that monitoring through burrow opening counts has the ability to detect overall changes in population abundance. Next, I examined the infaunal community, sediment conditions, and nutrient availability at one intertidal mudflat in the Skeena River Estuary following the cessation of heavy industrial activities (i.e. a salmon cannery and pulp mill) to determine the capacity for passive restoration. Sediment conditions varied spatiotemporally, and nutrient availability showed temporal variation but trends were difficult to relate to historical or current potential disturbances. The legacy of past development is still apparent on the infaunal community in the form of patchy distributions of disturbance-indicating taxa, but the mudflat appears to be in an overall healthy state with a diverse and functioning food web, indicating community recovery from historical activities. Results from these studies indicate passive restoration can be appropriate for estuarine soft-sediment ecosystems, while monitoring population abundance through burrow openings could be a method of detecting disturbances or tracking recovery of macrofaunal populations. / Graduate / 2020-06-28

Biodiversity is declining faster than at any other time in the Earth's history, driven mostly by land use change and degradation. Overberg Renosterveld, some of the most species diverse mediterranean type shrublands, are no exception with about 95% of their original extent lost to agriculture. Historically, large herds of indigenous grazing mammals roamed these landscapes. Today the Overberg's agricultural lands are fragmented by land cover change and divided by fences. In the contemporary landscape animals, largely domestic livestock, and plant resources are closely coupled, and overgrazing of remaining renosterveld fragments a significant threat, with potential to cause irreversible damage. The Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act (CARA) (Act 43 of 1983) states that farmers must not exceed the grazing capacity of the veld unless it is protected against deterioration and destruction, and that any land that is degraded or denuded must be effectively restored or reclaimed. Despite this legislation, there is little empirical research on the impacts of livestock grazing on renosterveld, as well as on restoration of overgrazed areas. It was the aim of this thesis to contribute to this gap in understanding. The thesis assessed the role of grazing by different livestock types, namely cattle and sheep, on biodiversity, the soil seed bank, and the restoration potential of renosterveld vegetation from resting the veld. The effect of livestock grazing by sheep and cattle on plant species richness and diversity and growth form diversity was assessed using Modified Whittaker plots and presented in Chapter 3. It was hypothesised that livestock grazing by cattle would have less effect on species richness and diversity and growth form diversity than sheep grazing and that both cattle and sheep grazing would lead to a reduction in species richness and diversity in comparison to renosterveld sites with a treatment of no grazing. Thirty sites where either no grazing has taken place or that have been grazed by cattle or sheep were selected with sites being evenly distributed between Eastern, Central and Western Rûens Shale Renosterveld. At each of the thirty sites, vegetation data were collected from a series of nested subplots of ten 1 m2 , two 10 m2 and one 100 m2 subplots nested within a 1 000 m2 plot. One soil sample was also collected from each 1 000 m2 plot to a depth of 10 cm for nutrient analysis. Findings revealed that sites grazed by sheep had significantly lower plant species richness (median richness = 29 species, mean Shannon-Weiner = 3.39) and diversity when compared to sites with a treatment of no grazing (median richness = 49 species, mean Shannon Weiner = 3.83). Sites with a treatment of no grazing had significantly higher richness of geophyte species (mean = 14.7) than sites grazed by cattle (mean = 7.0) and sheep (mean = 7.1) during the study. The results obtained were in line with the hypothesis that livestock grazing by sheep resulted in a reduction in species richness and diversity and vegetation cover in Overberg Renosterveld in comparison to sites where no grazing has taken place. Sites with a treatment of no grazing showed higher species richness and vegetation cover of non-succulent shrubs, annual forbs and perennial forbs than sites grazed by sheep. It was concluded that livestock grazing of Overberg Renosterveld by sheep needs to be done with care. This can be done by adopting a passive adaptive management approach. Here one set of management protocols can be developed and implemented and through science-based monitoring to inform management, these can be adapted as needed based on the key findings. Chapter 4 investigated ecosystem resilience and the restoration potential of Overberg Renosterveld through an exploration of its soil seed bank as a source for potential recovery. A glasshouse germination experiment investigated the effect of livestock grazing by cattle and by sheep in comparison with a grazing treatment of no grazing on the soil seed bank in Overberg Renosterveld, as well as the similarity between the standing vegetation and the soil seed bank. It was hypothesised that cattle and sheep grazing would reduce species richness, species diversity and growth form diversity in the soil seed bank in comparison with sites with a treatment of no grazing. Soil samples were collected from 30 sites that were also used in Chapter 3. The soil was then spread on top of a 6 cm layer of compost in seed trays, and smoke treated to enhance germination. Seedlings were assigned to growth form categories including forbs, geophytes, annuals, graminoids, succulent shrubs and nonsucculent shrubs and then identified to family, genus or species level. The results of the soil seed bank study were correlated with the vegetation results from Chapter 3 to examine the relationship between the standing vegetation and the soil seed bank. A total of 48% of taxa in the standing vegetation had seed present in the germinable seed bank. However, there were no differences in species richness, species diversity or number of individuals between grazing treatments. The results indicated that livestock grazing has a far less significant impact on the composition, species diversity and growth form diversity of the soil seed bank in Overberg Renosterveld than hypothesised. Instead, the results showed that there was a well-developed seed bank comprising mainly indigenous species with a variety of different growth forms including palatable grasses and shrubs. This indicates that Overberg Renosterveld vegetation has high restoration potential. Chapter 5 showed results on the effects of livestock grazing by cattle and sheep over time on plant species richness, diversity and growth form diversity in comparison with sites protected from grazing. Following collection of a baseline dataset, four years of follow up data were collected. A total of 22 fenced plots across Western, Central and Eastern Rûens Shale Renosterveld had a baseline dataset collected prior to being monitored on an annual basis over four years in grazed/ungrazed paired plots. Results on vegetation recovery from the fenced exclosures showed a significant increase in plant cover over time at sites that were not grazed. Mean species richness increased from 20.6 species to 25.4 species at sites with no grazing. Mean vegetation cover increased from 71% at T0 (the baseline time step) to 120% at T4 (the final time step) at the end of the study. Sites grazed by sheep had a decrease in vegetation cover over time each year from T0 to T4 from 75% to 50%. Results from a linear mixed model revealed that species richness between grazing treatments was significantly different at all time steps in the study. However, the significant differences were primarily due to comparisons between grazed sites and sites with a treatment of no grazing. Therefore, livestock grazing by sheep has a significant effect on renosterveld vegetation over time. Findings from this component of the study indicates that Overberg Renosterveld degraded by continuous heavy grazing has significant passive restoration potential by fencing renosterveld patches to facilitate more effective grazing management. Most of the renosterveld of the Overberg has been lost through habitat transformation for agriculture, and the future of that which remains is uncertain. This thesis affirms concerns around the impact of livestock grazing and shows the importance of improved ecological understanding around grazing management. Grazing by sheep was shown to cause greater impacts on renosterveld than other domestic livestock studied and is therefore a threat to renosterveld. These findings warrant closer attention to management practices around sheep grazing. However, the state of renosterveld soil seed banks offer considerable hope. Findings revealed a diverse indigenous seed bank, showing that renosterveld degraded by overgrazing has high restoration potential. Furthermore, fencing renosterveld to exclude livestock improves species richness and diversity over time. These findings highlight the need for caution when grazing renosterveld. However, where the damage has been done, the potential for recovery is high. Harnessing the soil seed bank in combination with excluding livestock grazing by fencing are effective tools in this critically endangered vegetation for achieving restoration and conservation goals.

Submitted by Claudia Rocha (claudia.rocha@udesc.br) on 2017-12-08T12:33:43Z No. of bitstreams: 1 PGEF16MA062.pdf: 2473191 bytes, checksum: cbe6e188be2f3f4cf384e50b2938078b (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-12-08T12:33:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 PGEF16MA062.pdf: 2473191 bytes, checksum: cbe6e188be2f3f4cf384e50b2938078b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-07-18 / PROMOP / The forest succession is a way to restore disturbed forest. Measure taken to to the of permanent preservation areas (PPA’s) adequacy, mainly riparian, wood-producing farms in the Santa Catarina Plateau South region. Since the need for monitoring of these environments the main objective of this study was to investigate the passive restoration in riparian forest on Poço Grande and Campo de Dentro farms, with the main focus for the survey of the tree composition. Only on the Poço Grande farm has further study, envolvento environmental compartmentalization in forest "reference" ecological formed by fragments into more advanced successional stage and locations in passive "restoration". Where it was included natural regeneration, seed bank, the presence of grasses (Ocellochloa rudis (Nees) Zuloaga & Morrone and Merostachys multiramea Hack), soil and canopy. The results of the first chapter indicates that compartmentalization on the farm Poço Grande showed that the sites in "restoration" have lower density values, basal area, evenness among arboreal, and greater participation of pioneers and autocóricos individuals. In the second chapter between 23 variables, the existence of an ecological gradient of diversity (Shannon index of tree) standing out among the other variables involved. The second gradient formed is related to the presence of O. rudis and higher soil pH and effective cation exchange capacity, even without a relationship with a sector, may influence the formation of a dense layer of biomass. The tree composition of Poço Grande and Campo de Dentro farms for years of assessment 2011 and 2016, has among the species most phytosociologic position. Between evaluated the sampled species follow the same pattern of ecological groups and dispersal syndromes, with high participation of zoochorous. Since the Poço Grande farm, a decrease in the share of late side individuals and increase climax individuals. Inside the Campo de Dentro farm was an 15 16 increase in the proportion of pioneering individuals and decrease among individuals climax. In both farms there was an increase of individuals with syndrome zoochoric dispersion and a decrease of anemochorous and autocóricos. The methodology of passive restoration proved to be a promising alternative in locations with favorable landscape. Indicates continuing the monitoring / A sucessão florestal é uma maneira de restaurar florestas alteradas. Medida adotada para para a adequação de áreas de preservação permanente (APP), principalmente ciliares, em fazendas produtoras de madeira na região do Planalto Sul Catarinense. Visto a necessidade de monitoramento destes ambientes o objetivo principal deste trabalho foi investigar a restauração passiva nas áreas ciliares das fazendas Poço Grande e Campo de Dentro, com enfoque principal para o levantamento da composição arbórea. Apenas na fazenda Poço Grande tem-se um estudo mais aprofundado, envolvento a setorização ambiental, em floresta de “referência” ecológica formada por fragmentos em estádio sucessional mais avançado e, locais em “restauração” passiva. Onde incluiu-se o levantamento da regeneração natural, banco de sementes, presença de gramíneas (Ocellochloa rudis (Nees) Zuloaga & Morrone e Merostachys multiramea Hack), solos e dossel. Os resultados do primeiro capítulo indicam que a setorização na fazenda Poço Grande evidenciou que os locais em “restauração” apresentam menores valores de densidade, área basal, equabilidade entre adultos, e maior participação de indivíduos pioneiros e autocóricos. No segundo capítulo entre 23 variáveis analisadas, a existência de um gradiente ecológico de diversidade (índice de Shannon de árboreas) sobressaindo-se entre as demais variáveis envolvidas. O segundo gradiente formado está relacionado a presença de O. rudis, com maiores valores de pH do solo e capacidade de troca catiônica efetiva, que mesmo sem uma relação com algum setor, pode influênciar pela formação de uma densa camada de biomassa. Ao avaliar a composição arbórea das fazendas Poço Grande e Campo de Dentro, para os anos de avaliação 2011 e 2016, tem-se a manutenção das espécies de maiores valores de importância. Entre os anos avaliados as espécies seguem o mesmo padrão de grupos ecológicos e síndromes de dispersão, com elevada participação de zoocó 11 12 ricas. Sendo que na fazenda Poço Grande, ocorreu diminuição na participação dos indivíduos secundários tardios e, aumento de indivíduos clímax. Na fazenda Campo de Dentro ocorreu aumento na proporção de indivíduos pioneiro e diminuição entre os indivíduos clímax. Em ambas fazendas se verificou um aumento de indivíduos com síndrome de dispersão zoocórica e, uma diminuição de anemocóricos e autocóricos. A metodologia da restauração passiva mostrou-se como uma alternativa promissora em locais com paisagem favorável. Indica-se dar continuidade ao monitoramento

L’écologie de la restauration est une discipline scientifique qui a vu le jour il y a une quarantaine d’années pour tenter de compenser les impacts négatifs du développement des sociétés sur les écosystèmes. Aujourd’hui, suite à des méta-analyses planétaires révélant le succès relatif des opérations de restauration écologique, une nouvelle question émerge : faut-il restaurer activement ou laisser en libre évolution les écosystèmes dégradés ? C’est dans ce contexte que ce projet de thèse a eu lieu avec une démarche qui s’est voulue pluridisciplinaire et a porté sur l’étude de l’impact de carrières sur la steppe méditerranéenne de Crau (Bouches-du-Rhône, France). Deux cas ont été pris en compte, (i) d’anciennes carrières exploitées dans les années 1970 et abandonnées présentant une diversité de modalités d’exploitation ou de réaménagement et, (ii) une carrière encore en cours d’exploitation dont la législation oblige la remise en état. L’objectif est de mieux identifier les éventuels verrous scientifiques en matière de connaissances pour la restauration et mieux définir les attentes sociétales afin de proposer au final une stratégie générale destinée à servir à la gestion future de ces écosystèmes. Les recherches de cette thèse se sont basées sur deux grandes questions, réflexions : (1) Les opérations de restauration écologique mises en place permettent-elles de restaurer l’écosystème de référence (= ici l’écosystème préexistant) ? En comparant différents traitements de restauration sur le long terme (transfert de sol selon différentes modalités, dépôts de matériaux anthropogéniques, absence de réhabilitation), nous avons pu montrer que le transfert de sol reste une bonne méthode, surtout lorsque les caractéristiques initiales du sol sont respectées. Néanmoins, il ne compense toujours pas à moyen-terme (35 ans) la destruction de l'écosystème préexistant : le sol et la communauté végétale de la steppe de référence ne sont pas encore complètement rétablis. Une deuxième technique de mélange de sol lorsque le sol originel n’est plus disponible a également été testée, mais elle ne présente pas non plus un succès total de restauration à court terme (3 ans). Une deuxième question s’est donc posée en parallèle: (2) Sans restauration active, quelle est la valeur de la biodiversité générée par les activités humaines ? Et plus globalement, quelles natures voulons-nous ? Les carrières ont détruit l’écosystème steppique qui préexistait mais ont créé également de nouvelles conditions (pédologiques, de nouveaux habitats) qui soutiennent le fonctionnement et la connectivité d’espèces pionnières et abritent une importante biodiversité patrimoniale absente de l’écosystème d’origine. De plus, la comparaison entre les paysages de carrières et l’écosystème de référence auprès de différents acteurs territoriaux et du grand public a montré que les anciennes carrières sont perçues comme étant beaucoup plus naturelles que la steppe de référence et qu’elles sont également associées à une importante biodiversité. Ces résultats pourraient donc réorienter les choix de restauration ou de gestion, afin de choisir entre 1) ce qui est actuellement recommandé (une restauration active appliquée en fin d’exploitation avec l’écosystème historique en référence) et 2) une libre expression de la nature férale encore appelée restauration passive (avec ou pas réaffectation initiale ; i.e. où l’écosystème de référence est différent de l’écosystème préexistant). / Restoration ecology is a scientific discipline that has emerged forty years ago to try to compensate the negative impacts of society development on ecosystems. Today, following global meta-analyzes revealing the relative success of ecological restoration, a new question emerges: should we actively or passively restore degraded ecosystems? It is in this context that this thesis project took place with a multidisciplinary approach and focused on the study of quarrying impacts on the Mediterranean steppe of Crau (Bouches-du-Rhône, France). Two cases were taken into account: (i) old quarries operated in the 1970s and abandoned then, presenting a variety of exploitation types or rehabilitation modalities, and (ii) a quarry still in the process of exploitation, the legislation now requiring repairs. The aim is to better identify possible scientific obstacles in the field of knowledge for ecological restoration and better define societal expectations in order to finally propose a general strategy intended to serve the future management of these ecosystems. The research of this thesis was based on two major questions, reflections: (1) Do ecological restoration actions restore the reference ecosystem (= the pre-existing ecosystem)? By comparing different long-term restoration treatments (various types of soil transfers, anthropogenic deposits, lack of rehabilitation), we were able to show that soil transfer is still the best method, especially when the initial characteristics of the soil are respected. However, it still does not compensate in the medium term (35 years) for the destruction of the pre-existing ecosystem: the soil and the plant community of the reference steppe are not completely restored yet. A second soil mixing technique used when the original soil is no longer available has also been tested, but it is not very successful either in the short-term (3 years). A second question arose in parallel: (2) Without active restoration, what is the value of biodiversity generated by human activities? And more generally, what kind of nature do we want? Quarries have destroyed the pre-existing steppe ecosystem but have also created new conditions (soil, new habitats) that support the functioning and connectivity of pioneer species and shelter important heritage biodiversity that is absent from the pre-existing ecosystem. In addition, the comparison between the quarry landscapes and the reference ecosystem landscapes with different stakeholders and the general public has shown that the old quarries are perceived as being much more natural than the reference steppe and that they are also associated to an important biodiversity. These results could therefore reorient the choice of restoration or management, in order to choose between 1) what is currently recommended (active restoration applied after the end of quarry exploitation with the historical ecosystem as a reference) and 2) the free expression of feral nature also called passive restoration (with or without reclamation, i.e. where the reference ecosystem is different from the pre-existing ecosystem).