Chapter 1 presents the backgrounds and research questions of the dissertation project. Although everyone hopes to die with dignity, a “good death” is often privileged. Inequality in end-of-life care in the United States is striking; older minorities are 3 times more likely to receive intrusive care and experience hospital readmission and less likely to use hospice care and die at home. With the hope to address disparities in end-of-life outcomes, as part of the Affordable Care Act, Medicare expanded its benefit and started to reimburse end-of-life care planning services from 2016. This dissertation examines the roles of health insurance policy and its advocated intervention in ensuring person-centered dying experiences in the United States and the public readiness for establishing a similar end-of-life care policy in China. The second chapter examines whether physician–patient advance care planning (ACP) discussions, the “intervention” embedded in the policy, is effective at prompting end-of-life care planning behaviors and improving end-of-life experiences. I also studied the heterogenous effects by race and ethnicity. I used exit data about 7,282 deceased Medicare-eligible respondents from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) from 2012 to 2020, a nationally representative biennial survey of U.S. older adults. I conducted latent class analysis to identify different end-of-life experiences and used multinomial logistic regression models to study the relationship between having ACP discussions with doctors and different end-of-life experiences in full and stratified samples by race and ethnicity. Then I used path analyses to test whether completing legal documentation initiated by ACP services explains the effectiveness of the intervention. The results show three types of end-of-life experiences among White, Black, and Hispanic older adults; significant effects of end-of-life care discussions with doctors on uncomfortable dying experiences and extensive use of invasive treatments in the older White population; and the partial mediating role of completion of legal health care documents on the relationship between ACP discussions and end-of-life outcomes. This study identified the limited effectiveness of physician–patient ACP discussions among minority older adults and emphasizes the importance of quality, content (e.g., to cover legal documentation during the conversation), and cultural appropriateness of ACP consultations led by doctors. The third chapter examines the heterogenous intent-to-treat effect of the Medicare policy on older adults’ motivation to plan for care by exploiting policy intervention as a natural experiment. Taking advantage of the longitudinal nature of the HRS, I used core data with 47,982 observations nested in 15,647 individuals across 9 years (2012–2020). I used two quasi-experimental models—interrupted time series analysis and difference-in-difference—to study the care-planning outcomes before and after the policy implementation between older adults eligible or not eligible for Medicare. I studied the heterogenous effects in stratified samples by race and ethnicity, immigration background, and socioeconomic status proxied by education and wealth. I used coarsened exact matching to address the potential bias of the comparison group not being the ideal counterfactual control unit. I found that in the total population, the Medicare policy was associated with a significant increase in the proportion of older adults who completed a living will and designated a durable power of attorney for health care, but not having an ACP conversation. Furthermore, although there were immediate positive policy effects, the increases in ACP outcomes driven by the ACA Medicare benefit expansion were not sustained. Finally, I found no evidence that the ACA Medicare benefit expansion was effective in improving the rates of ACP among Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, or non-U.S.-born older adults. I also identified heterogeneous policy effects by socioeconomic status. I discuss promising recommendations for health care policy and practice to improve the participation rate of end-of-life care planning. Chapter 4 explores the feasibility of encouraging physicians to discuss end-of-life care wishes with older patients in China. Knowledge of a medical diagnosis is critical for end-of-life decision making. However, a patient’s right to know their diagnosis is neither guaranteed nor protected by law in China. Doctors typically inform family members of the patient’s illness diagnosis and prognosis and let them decide whether to disclose this information to the patient. This study examined middle-aged and older Chinese adults’ preferences for disclosing their and significant others’ diagnoses and whether sociodemographic, economic, and cultural factors were associated with these preferences. The research team surveyed 571 adults aged 50 or older in Shanghai from 2021 to 2022. The outcome measures are preferences for diagnosis disclosures, including whether and to whom diagnoses should be disclosed. I characterized preference types using latent class analysis and estimated multinomial logistic regression to identify the covariates associated with each preference type. Three latent classes were identified. The transparent group (34%) believed patients, whether self or a significant other, should be informed of their diagnoses. The contradictory group (50%) held conflicting attitudes; they preferred to know their diagnosis but preferred that significant others not be informed of their diagnoses. The avoidant group (16%) preferred not to know their diagnosis or to disclose significant others’ diagnoses to them. Familism attitudes were positively associated with holding contradictory views. Experiences with hospitalization and medical decision-making for family members were associated with holding transparent views. I discuss the importance of illness disclosure for honoring patients’ autonomous decision-making.

On March 23, 2010, President Barack Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) into law. This reform, it is argued, is projected to increase insurance coverage of pre-existing conditions, to expand access to insurance for more than 30 million Americans, and to increase estimated National medical spending while lowering projected Medicare spending. This thesis sought to investigate and analyze the perceptions of senior citizens in Central Florida about PPACA and their perceived effects on the healthcare quality provided to them under this law. Four sections of PPACA bill, thought to specifically pertain to the elderly, were selected for this study; respondents were asked their opinions regarding PPACA's aspects of: (1) the reform on preventive healthcare services; (2) Medicare Part D (prescription drugs); (3) Medicare; and (4) Medicaid. This thesis employed both qualitative and quantitative methodologies; data were collected and analyzed with findings presented and discussed.

Cette thèse inscrite dans la tradition intellectuelle de l’American Political Development analyse les liens dialectiques entre l’entrepreneuriat des présidents des États-Unis sur la question de l’assurance maladie, l’essor du système de santé américain contemporain et son produit le plus récent, le Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010). Il s’agit d’analyser les influences réciproques entre un exécutif qui subit de très fortes contraintes institutionnelles dans ce champ précis des politiques publiques et un système de santé dont les fondements et les contours sont en perpétuelle mutation. Les réformes de santé, de par leur nature transversale et polémique, leur complexité mais aussi leur poids dans l'économie américaine, agissent directement sur les équilibres de la gouvernance publique. Elles doivent être considérées comme un laboratoire et un accélérateur d’innovations pour la présidence, dans un système politique où sa sphère d’action est limitée, tant par les freins et des contre-pouvoirs que par l’influence d’autres entrepreneurs politiques dotés d’une légitimité d’action égale voir supérieure à se saisir de la question épineuse de la santé. L’adoption du PPACA, sa promulgation par un président démocrate après un siècle de rendez-vous manqués avec les réformes ambitieuses de l’assurance maladie, ainsi que sa mise en œuvre compliquée, offrent un cas d’étude de premier plan sur les évolutions de l'exécutif étasunien et sur la normalisation d’un entrepreneuriat présidentiel hétérodoxe. / This dissertation which falls within the intellectual tradition of American Political Development explores the dialectical links between the entrepreneurship of US presidents on health care reform, the development of the American health care system and its latest product, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), which was signed into law in 2010. This work analyses the mutual forces of influence at work between a deeply constrained executive in this particular field of public policy and a health care system whose foundations and contours are in constant mutation. Given its controversial nature, its complexity and its weight in the US economy, health care reform directly affects the dynamics of public governance. Health care reform must therefore be considered as a laboratory and an accelerator of innovations for the presidency, in a political system in which its sphere of action is limited, as much by checks and balances as by the influence of other entrepreneurs who enjoy equivalent if not greater legitimacy than the executive branch to take action on the thorny issue of health care. The passage of the PPACA, the fact that it was signed into law by a democratic president after a century of failed attempts at ambitious reform as well as its arduous implementation, are a picture perfect case study on the evolutions of the presidential institution and on the routinization of heterodox presidential entrepreneurship.

This research focuses on obesity and other major risk factors for chronic diseases such as Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Disease, and Stroke. Worksite wellness programs have been successful in this realm of health promotion and disease prevention for heart disease and stroke, but their effectiveness in treating diabetes has been uncertain partially due to poor patient compliance, lack of stress reduction strategies, poor diet and lack of persuasive health education on the risk of being obese. Published peer-reviewed articles were reviewed, coded and analyzed to determine best practices, using a modified systematic review approach. The findings from these studies yield results that were used to develop a new employer-sponsored wellness program that is in accordance with the recently passed Affordable Care Act. / Includes bibliography. / Thesis (M.S.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2014. / FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection

Doctor protection vs. patient protection. This diploma thesis deals with the medical law, namely the protection of physicians and the protection of patients, and their mutual comparison as entities standing more or less against each other. The main objective of the thesis was to analyse the protection of both sides; the practical example provides describes a controversial situation which may happen in reality, also gives better understanding of the issue for readers. The aim was to capture the complex and also very extensive legal regulation of the topic, focusing on the touchpoints between the medical and civic laws. In view of the wide range of the topic in question, I consider specifically some sections of the thesis as the most important. At the beginning, the thesis provides a specification of the elementary legislation regulating the medical law. This is not a comprehensive list of resources, due to the enormous extent of the legislation regulating the medical law. Individual chapters describe the topics of informed consent and the protection of personal data, the provision of healthcare without the patient's consent and the special arrangement concerning the consent of underage patients, the relationship between the physician and the patient, the confidentiality duty, previously expressed...

The Diploma work "Health care reform in the United States of America" is the sequel of the Bachelor work of 2008 called "The liberal health care system of the United States of America". The work is focused on the financial means and changes which has been effective since singing The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (acronym PPACA) into the United States law on 23rd March 2010 by the democratic president Barack Obama. The special attention is drawn to permanently increasing health care costs and defrauding of money within the social heath care program Medicare that is designated for seniors 65 and over as well as handicapped people. This work deals with Massachusetts Mandatory Health Insurance Program of 2006, which has been used like a model for the new federal law PPACA. The practical part presents the particular changes brought by the new law, including their impact on the chosen social groups -- the uninsured, the employers, the families and their kids, the seniors and the people with "pre-existing conditions". Since the Health care reform is the political issue as well, at the end there are mentioned some pros and cons opinions.

Essay in Political Science, C-level, by Camila Alvarez Cea, spring semester 2010.   Tutor: Alf Sundin “Reality or a Political Mirage? – A Study of the Swedish Press Views on the Health Insurance Reform in the USA”   The purpose of this essay is partly to examine whether the picture that Swedish press presents of the health insurance reform in the US, which is part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Act bill, will be of crucial importance to the possibilities that the American population has to receive health insurance. The main research question is accordingly: “Does the picture that Swedish press presents of the health insurance reform in the USA, seem like something that will be of radical importance to the possibilities of the population to receive healthcare?” The purpose is also to examine in which model (demand or market) the opinions of the Swedish press fits. This purpose will be answered by using three specific questions asking whether their opinions differ when it comes to three criterions: organization, financing/resources and delivery systems. These criterions come from a model from Milton I. Roemer’s book “National health systems of the world,” which also is the theoretical foundation of this essay.   The methodological approach of this essay is a qualitative text analysis along with an analysis chart, where the three criterions have been examined from the reporting of the four Swedish newspapers chosen for this essay. The conclusions that have been reached from the analysis chart are that the opinions differ greatly within Swedish press, and that the picture that Swedish press presents of the health insurance reform is that it will become easier for the American population to receive health care.

BACKGROUND: The barriers in accessing healthcare for gay, lesbian and bisexuals individuals are not well explored. These challenges as well as a lack of knowledge concerning this understudied group has prompted the Institute of Medicine to create a research agenda to build a foundational understanding of gay, lesbian and bisexual health and the barriers they encounter.1 the primary aim of this study will be to compare the differences in health care access and utilization between gay/lesbian, bisexual and heterosexual individuals using a large, nationally representative dataset of the U.S. population. METHODS: Data from 2001 to 2012 from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey was pooled. Using logistic regression, we calculated the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of having health insurance, having a routine place and seeing a provider at least one in the past year. RESULTS: We found that gay men were more likely to have health insurance coverage (ORadj:2.13 95%CI: 1.15,3.92), while bisexual men were at a small disadvantage in having health insurance coverage (ORadj:0.82 95%CI: 0.46,1.46). Bisexual men were more likely to have received health care in the past 12 months (ORadj:3.11 95%CI: 1.74,5.55). Lesbian women were less likely to have health insurance coverage (ORadj-lesbian:0.58 95%CI: 0.34,0.97). CONCLUSION: This study contributed to the limited knowledge on understanding the health care access and utilization among gay, lesbian and bisexual individuals, which was classified as a high priority by the Institute of Medicine. Expanding health insurance coverage through the Affordable Care Act and Universal Partnership Coverage may reduce the disparities among gay, lesbian and bisexual individuals.

Americans spent nearly $2.6 trillion, or $8,000 per person for medical and administrative costs in 2010. By 2015, healthcare spending in the United States increased to 5.8% reaching $3.2 trillion or $9,990 per individual. By tackling healthcare administrative costs, it is estimated that healthcare providers could reduce these costs by $20 billion yearly. This case study explored strategies for streamlining hospital administrative procedures to reduce costs. The business process reengineering model formed the conceptual framework for this study. Data were gathered through semistructured face-to-face interviews guided by open-ended questions with a purposeful sample of 4 hospital managers in Atlanta, Georgia. This study identifies important themes regarding cost reduction and hospital administration based on participant interviews. Themes included participants' unfavorable perspectives of the Spell out PPACA (PPACA) legislation, employment of physicians, PPACA reimbursement method, follow-up services, hospital administrative governance, and lack of business education. The themes comprised steps hospital managers could take to streamline administrative procedures to reduce costs. The implications for positive social change included the potential to provide strategies for streamlined processes that could lead to savings passed on to patients from low socio-economic backgrounds through accessibility to affordable healthcare services.

Amid the global pandemic, it becomes more apparent that diabetes is a pressing health concern because racial/ethnic minorities with underlying diabetes conditions have been disproportionately affected. The study proposes a multiyear examination to document the role of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in racial/ethnic disparities in diabetes health. Using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from 2011 to 2019, the study with a pre-post design investigated changes in access to care and diabetes health among non-White minorities compared with Whites before and after the ACA by conducting multivariable linear regression, with state-fixed effects and robust standard errors. Compared with Whites, racial/ethnic minorities showed significant improvements in health insurance coverage, having a personal doctor, and not seeing a doctor because of cost. Blacks (3.2% points,  ≤ 0.000), Hispanics (1.6% points,  = 0.001), and "other" racial/ethnic group (1.5% points,  = 0.003) experienced a greater increase in diagnosed prediabetes than Whites, whereas no and small differences were found in diagnosed diabetes and obesity, respectively. The yearly comparisons of changes in diagnosed prediabetes showed that Blacks compared with Whites had a growing increase from 1.2% points ( = 0.001) in 2014 to 3.3% points ( = 0.001) in 2019. Insurance coverage has declined after 2016, and obesity had an increasing trend across race/ethnicity. The ACA had a positive role in improving access to care and identifying those at risk for diabetes to a larger extent among racial/ethnic minorities. However, the policy impacts have been diminishing in recent years. Continued efforts are needed for sustained policy effects.