<p>The aim of the study was to determine the oral and debntal health status of pediatric cardiac patients, 12 years of age and younger, and compare them with non-cardiac patients. A total of 150 children, 75 with known cardiac condition (study group) and 75 no-cardiac (control group) were examined. No statistically significant differences were established in the study between the caries experience score for the cardiac and control groups. The study concludes that the cardiac group generally has a higher decay component and a lower missing component which may be an indication of the lack of dental intervention. The gingival inflammation was significantly higher in the cardiac group although the plaque scores were similar in the two groups.</p>

Rationale: Methodological quality of systematic reviews (SRs) remains an area of concern with no consensus on the optimal appraisal instrument to assess quality of published research. Hypothesis: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) is a feasible and useful methodology to assess quality of evidence in pediatric pharmacotherapy. Aim: To demonstrate the applicability of the GRADE to selected topics. Methods: To perform two SRs to illustrate the practical use of the GRADE, highlight methodological challenges encountered and compare the GRADE to the alternative appraisal tool. Results: the GRADE was implemented to conduct two SRs. Judgments on imprecision were challenging. Comparison of the GRADE to alternative tool demonstrated that GRADE may generate different conclusions on overall quality assessment. Conclusion: The GRADE is a valuable innovative tool for assessing quality of evidence, applicable to the field of pediatric pharmacotherapy, with a potential to impact inferences drawn after applying alternative instruments.

Introduction: The ideal timing to initiate orthodontic treatment is an important, yet controversial issue. The purpose of this study was to investigate the provision of orthodontic care for 7 types of skeletal dysplasia by paediatric dentists and orthodontists in Canada. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to randomly selected orthodontists (N=140) and paediatric dentists (N=132) throughout Canada. Surveys returned within 8 weeks were included for c2 statistical analysis. Results: The response rate was 59% for orthodontists and 54% for pediatric dentists. Orthodontists and pediatric dentists differed significantly in the timing of their first orthodontic consultation (p < 0.01). More pediatric dentists used to the dental age to determine the appropriate time to initiate treatment (p < 0.01), whereas more orthodontists relied on the pubertal indicators (p < 0.01). More orthodontists would intervene in the early mixed dentition for moderate mandibular prognathia (p < 0.01); mid-mixed dentition for severe mandibular retrognathia (p < 0.01), late mixed dentition for moderate mandibular retrognathia (p < 0.01) and permanent dentition for skeletal openbite and severe mandibular prognathia (p < 0.01). Most pediatric dentists would intervene in the early and mid-mixed dentition for the specified cases of skeletal malocclusions (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The results of this investigation indicate both consistencies and variation between orthodontic and paediatric practitioners with regard to preference in treatment timing, and the factors that influence these decisions.

Introduction: The ideal timing to initiate orthodontic treatment is an important, yet controversial issue. The purpose of this study was to investigate the provision of orthodontic care for 7 types of skeletal dysplasia by paediatric dentists and orthodontists in Canada. Methods: A questionnaire was distributed to randomly selected orthodontists (N=140) and paediatric dentists (N=132) throughout Canada. Surveys returned within 8 weeks were included for c2 statistical analysis. Results: The response rate was 59% for orthodontists and 54% for pediatric dentists. Orthodontists and pediatric dentists differed significantly in the timing of their first orthodontic consultation (p < 0.01). More pediatric dentists used to the dental age to determine the appropriate time to initiate treatment (p < 0.01), whereas more orthodontists relied on the pubertal indicators (p < 0.01). More orthodontists would intervene in the early mixed dentition for moderate mandibular prognathia (p < 0.01); mid-mixed dentition for severe mandibular retrognathia (p < 0.01), late mixed dentition for moderate mandibular retrognathia (p < 0.01) and permanent dentition for skeletal openbite and severe mandibular prognathia (p < 0.01). Most pediatric dentists would intervene in the early and mid-mixed dentition for the specified cases of skeletal malocclusions (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The results of this investigation indicate both consistencies and variation between orthodontic and paediatric practitioners with regard to preference in treatment timing, and the factors that influence these decisions.

Thesis (MAppSc in Physiotherapy) -- University of South Australia, 1993

Thesis (M.P.H.)--University of Adelaide, Dept. of Community Medicine, 1988. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 161-192).

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1967. / Typescript (photocopy). Includes bibliographical references (leaves 36-38). Also issued in print.

Thesis--University of Pittsburgh. / eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record.

Thesis (doctoral)--Münster, 1934. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 19).

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, 2005. / Includes bibliographical references.