• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 2
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

GoDonnie : defini??o e avalia??o de uma linguagem de programa??o para comandar rob? por programadores iniciantes com defici?ncia visual

Oliveira, Juliana Damasio 04 August 2017 (has links)
Submitted by PPG Ci?ncia da Computa??o (ppgcc@pucrs.br) on 2017-11-06T20:31:38Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Juliana_Damasio_Oliveira.pdf: 17038064 bytes, checksum: 78253804cde58707af38ca06c2db8603 (MD5) / Rejected by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br), reason: Devolvido devido ? falta de capa institucional no arquivo PDF e nas p?ginas seguintes a folha de rosto (1? p?gina que est? no PDF enviado), ao inv?s da ficha catalogr?fica, diz "substitua pela ficha catalogr?fica?, e na seguinte, "substitua esta p?gina pelo termo de apresenta??o". on 2017-11-17T11:27:09Z (GMT) / Submitted by PPG Ci?ncia da Computa??o (ppgcc@pucrs.br) on 2017-11-17T15:26:49Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Juliana_Damasio_Oliveira_dis.pdf: 18621482 bytes, checksum: 89b806e6216f765a77090d5b5c452490 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-11-22T19:20:46Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Juliana_Damasio_Oliveira_dis.pdf: 18621482 bytes, checksum: 89b806e6216f765a77090d5b5c452490 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-11-22T19:26:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Juliana_Damasio_Oliveira_dis.pdf: 18621482 bytes, checksum: 89b806e6216f765a77090d5b5c452490 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-08-04 / DELL / The general objective of this work was to define and evaluate a programming language to stimulate orientation and mobility (O&M) skills by people with visual impairment (VI). It is believed that by using a programming language to guide a robot in a virtual setting, the person with VI can better understand O&M skills. In this sense, it was definedthe programming language, which was called GoDonnie, and was based on the Logo language. A GoDonnie is run in a programming environment called Donnie, which provides soundbacks about running the robot. In addition, it has a 2D graphic simulator with a virtual robot, in which one can visualize the execution of the language commands, that is, the virtual robot sedeslocando in the scenario. This simulator allows the use by people with low vision, as well as serve as a resource to better visualize how the person who is blind is interacting with the robot in the environment. A GoDonnie has been evaluated to verify its usability. Evaluations were carried out which included visually impaired people and teachers of programming, without visual impairment. The results pointed out that GoDonnie has good usability, as well as helps the evelopment of O&M. / O objetivo geral desse trabalho foi definir e avaliar uma linguagem de programa??o para estimular as habilidades de orienta??o e mobilidade (O&M) por pessoas com defici?ncia visual. Acredita-se que ao utilizar uma linguagem de programa??o para guiar um rob? em um cen?rio virtual, a pessoa com defici?ncia visual (DV) possa melhor compreender habilidades de O&M. Neste sentido, foi definida a linguagem de programa??o, que foi denominada GoDonnie, e foi baseada na linguagem Logo. A GoDonnie ? executada em um ambiente de programa??o chamado Donnie, que fornece feedbacks sonoros sobre a execu??o do rob?. Al?m disso, possui um simulador gr?fico 2D com um rob? virtual, no qual se pode visualizar a execu??o dos comandos da linguagem, ou seja, o rob? virtual se deslocando no cen?rio. Esse simulador permite o uso por pessoas com baixa vis?o, al?m de servir como recurso para melhor visualizar como a pessoa que ? cega est? interagindo com o rob? no ambiente. A GoDonnie foi avaliada para verificar a sua usabilidade. Foram realizadas avalia??es que inclu?ram pessoas com defici?ncia visual e professores de programa??o, sem defici?ncia visual. Os resultados apontaram que a GoDonnie possui uma boa usabilidade, assim como auxilia o desenvolvimento de O&M.
2

Usabilidade e acessibilidade no Reposit?rio de Informa??o Acess?vel da UFRN: avalia??o ergon?mica de interfaces Web

Furtado, Margareth Maciel Figueiredo Dias 02 September 2016 (has links)
Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-01-13T14:44:28Z No. of bitstreams: 1 MargarethMacielFigueiredoDiasFurtado_DISSERT.pdf: 5414386 bytes, checksum: 155e8d6b1ba259ae9fc2a3743383bdb2 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-01-26T16:10:34Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 MargarethMacielFigueiredoDiasFurtado_DISSERT.pdf: 5414386 bytes, checksum: 155e8d6b1ba259ae9fc2a3743383bdb2 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-01-26T16:10:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MargarethMacielFigueiredoDiasFurtado_DISSERT.pdf: 5414386 bytes, checksum: 155e8d6b1ba259ae9fc2a3743383bdb2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-09-02 / Esta pesquisa visa avaliar os requisitos ergon?micos de usabilidade e acessibilidade presentes na interface do Reposit?rio de Informa??o Acess?vel, considerando a opini?o dos usu?rios com baixa vis?o e cegueira. A operacionaliza??o deste objetivo geral deu-se por meio dos seguintes objetivos espec?ficos: a) verificar a funcionalidade de bot?es e links apresentados na interface do Reposit?rio de Informa??o Acess?vel da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; b) identificar os entraves e inconsist?ncias de usabilidade e acessibilidade na interface; c) conhecer os pontos pass?veis de melhorias da interface do Reposit?rio de Informa??o Acess?vel que contribuam com subs?dios para elabora??o de proposta de interven??o a ser realizada na Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. A pesquisa se caracterizou como explorat?ria, descritiva e aplicada, empregando a estrat?gia metodol?gica de estudo de caso, com base em uma abordagem quanti-qualitativa. A coleta de dados foi feita com o desenvolvimento de teste de usabilidade, observa??o participante e question?rio semiaberto. Para a an?lise quantitativa dos dados foi empregado o m?todo estat?stico; e para a an?lise qualitativa foi adotada a an?lise de conte?do. Para a converg?ncia dos resultados foi empregada a triangula??o dos dados para m?ltiplos instrumentos. A amostra investigada foi composta por oito usu?rios cadastrados no Reposit?rio de Informa??o Acess?vel, representando 25% dessa popula??o. Quanto ? caracteriza??o dos participantes, a an?lise evidenciou o seguinte perfil: mulheres (50%), entre 31 e 40 anos, tr?s com baixa vis?o e uma com cegueira, sendo tr?s na gradua??o e uma na p?s-gradua??o; homens (50%), entre 34 e 53 anos, todos com cegueira, sendo dois na gradua??o e dois na p?s-gradua??o. Os resultados revelaram pontos necess?rios de mudan?as na interface do reposit?rio. Identifica??o de pontos de entraves para as fun??es: legendas descritivas e tamanho inadequado de bot?es e ?cones, como bot?es de contraste, mapa do site e bot?es iniciar e encerrar sess?o; n?o funcionalidade do mapa do site e atalhos, bem como inexist?ncia de uma fun??o retorno. Verificou-se ainda que, independentemente dos entraves, os participantes aplicaram outras medidas para concluir os testes. Quanto ao registro de recomenda??es, destacam-se a necessidade de legenda descritiva, aumento de ?cones, ativa??o de links inativos, implanta??o de novos recursos e avalia??o t?cnica peri?dica. A pesquisa tamb?m comprovou que os participantes conceberam a identifica??o de inconsist?ncias e sugest?es de melhorias como fator de aprimoramento para a interface, confirmando que o estado do site no momento do teste foi considerado como aceit?vel. Considera-se que devido ?s constantes mudan?as das tecnologias e poss?veis demandas dos usu?rios reais e potenciais do reposit?rio, ser?o necess?rias novas avalia??es, no futuro, para confirmar a qualidade do servi?o. / This research aims to evaluate the ergonomic requirements of usability and accessibility present in the Accessible Information Repository interface, based on the opinion of users with low vision and blindness. The implementation of this overall goal was given by the following specific objectives: a) check functionality of buttons and links in the Accessible Information Repository interface of Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, b) identify obstacles and inconsistencies in the interface usability and accessibility, c) know the points liable to improvements in the Accessible Information Repository interface that contribute with subsidies to the elaboration of intervention proposal to be held at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte. The research is characterized as exploratory, descriptive and applied, using the methodological strategy of case study, based on a quantitative and qualitative approach. Data collection was made with the development of usability testing, participant observation and semi-open questionnaire. For quantitative analysis of the data was used the statistical method; and for the qualitative analysis was used content analysis. For the convergence of the results it used the triangulation of data for multiple instruments. The sample studied was composed of eight registered users in the Accessible Information Repository, representing 25 % of this population. As for the characterization of the participants, the analysis showed the following profile: women (50%), between 31 and 40 years, three with low vision and one with blindness, being three undergraduate and one a graduate student; men (50%), between 34 and 53 years, all with blindness, two undergraduate and two graduate students. The results showed points with necessity of changes in the interface repository. Identification of points of obstacles to the functions: descriptive captions and inadequate size of buttons and icons, such as contrast buttons, site map and start and end session buttons; lack of functionality in the map of the site and shortcuts, as well as lack of a return function. It was also found that regardless of obstacles, participants applied other measures to complete the tests. As for the registration recommendations, we highlight the need for descriptive caption, increase of icons size, activation of inactive links, implementation of new features and periodic technical evaluation. The survey also proved that the participants conceived the identification of inconsistencies and suggestions for improvements as enhancement factor for the interface, confirming that the condition of the site at the time of the test was considered acceptable. It is considered that due to constant changes in technologies and possible demands of the actual and potential users of the repository, it will be required new evaluations in the future to confirm the quality of service.

Page generated in 0.0895 seconds