Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2016-10-14T17:51:40Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2015 - Sandra Aparecida Kitakawa Lima.pdf: 2432759 bytes, checksum: 507c18959779e5fc9eea3cc4761ef0f3 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-10-14T17:51:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2015 - Sandra Aparecida Kitakawa Lima.pdf: 2432759 bytes, checksum: 507c18959779e5fc9eea3cc4761ef0f3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-12-21 / CNPq / Based on the survey conducted in a rural settlement field research of agrarian reform and ?quilombo? community in the municipality of Camamu - Bahia, we initially follow the emergence of claims and justification of the residents themselves in situations of disputes and uncertainties facing the government, or rather, the needs and difficulties, which they configured in collective issues being publicly exposed and problematize in public scenes. From two different contexts, we try to understand how the actors obtained (or not) the attention and public responses and the different moralities driven to justify their actions and attitudes towards each other, to build speeches about their feelings of justice or even to guide their performances. Although they were visible and recognized to some extent by the state and its institutions that did not mean that their unique problems were addressed and resolved by public "prioritiy" actions directed to agrarian reform beneficiary public and quilombo communities. On the contrary, they faced with enormous difficulties of enforcement of legal provisions and public policies to their particularities, in addition to multiple costs derived of the claims that, in principle, are rights defined by the Constitution. Thus, the conformation of collective life in daily life, which rests on different concrete practices conducted by a multiplicity of logic and feelings, which allows a "common citizen" to be set up as a "subject of law". / Com base na pesquisa de campo realizada em um assentamento rural de reforma agr?ria e uma comunidade quilombola, no munic?pio de Camamu ? Bahia, acompanhamos inicialmente a emerg?ncia das reivindica??es e justificativas dos pr?prios moradores frente a situa??es de disputas e incertezas na rela??o com o poder p?blico, ou melhor, das necessidades e dificuldades, que se configuravam em quest?es coletivas sendo expostas e problematizadas nas cenas p?blicas. A partir de dois contextos distintos, buscamos compreender de que forma os atores captavam (ou n?o) a aten??o e respostas p?blicas aos problemas vivenciados, bem como as diferentes moralidades acionadas a fim de justificar suas a??es e atitudes face ao outro, de construir discursos sobre seus sentimentos de justi?a ou mesmo de guiar suas performances. Embora fossem vis?veis e reconhecidos, em certa medida, pelo Estado e suas institui??es, isso n?o significava que seus problemas singulares fossem tratados e solucionados por a??es p?blicas ?priorit?rias? direcionadas aos p?blicos de reforma agr?ria e comunidades quilombolas. Ao contr?rio, defrontavam-se com enormes dificuldades de efetiva??o dos dispositivos legais e das pol?ticas p?blicas direcionadas ?s suas particularidades, al?m dos m?ltiplos custos decorrentes das reivindica??es que, a princ?pio, s?o direitos definidos pela Constitui??o Federal. Assim, a conforma??o da vida coletiva no cotidiano, a qual se repousa em diferentes pr?ticas concretas conduzidas por uma multiplicidade de l?gicas e sentimentos, que permite um ?cidad?o comum? se configurar como um ?sujeito de direito?