Spelling suggestions: "subject:"colicy agendas 5project"" "subject:"colicy agendas 3kproject""
1 |
Disproportionate attention on the Supreme CourtWhyman, Michelle C. 26 July 2011 (has links)
Despite its emergence as a key player in igniting policy change, very little work has been done to understand the Supreme Court’s agenda in terms of policy content. Scholars have tended to describe the Court mostly in terms of the direction (liberal/conservative) of justices’ decisions and the significance of particular cases. As a result, I ask if the Supreme Court allocates a disproportionate share of its docket to particular policy areas and if over attention to issue areas can be explained in terms of ideological shifts on the Court. This paper utilizes a new dataset, which includes a sample
of 4591 certiorari denied cases and all 7014 cases granted certiorari from 1948 to 1990. Each case is coded for policy content according to the Policy Agendas Project coding scheme. By comparing the policy content of certiorari granted and certiorari denied cases
over time, I show that judicial attention to policy areas waxes and wanes and court eras can be differentiated according to which issues occupied a disproportionate share of the Court’s attention. Additionally, I demonstrate that disproportionate attention to a subset of issue areas varies with changes in the ideological makeup of the Court. / text
|
2 |
A questão agrária na agenda governamental de FHC e Lula : uma análise à luz dos estudos de formação de agendaCarvalho, Flávia Sanches de 10 March 2017 (has links)
Submitted by Aelson Maciera (aelsoncm@terra.com.br) on 2017-06-08T18:19:51Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DissFSC.pdf: 1110469 bytes, checksum: f0d46b0ea8125d9d7b00c3e857a7cfd6 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Ronildo Prado (ronisp@ufscar.br) on 2017-06-13T18:31:56Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
DissFSC.pdf: 1110469 bytes, checksum: f0d46b0ea8125d9d7b00c3e857a7cfd6 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Ronildo Prado (ronisp@ufscar.br) on 2017-06-13T18:32:04Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
DissFSC.pdf: 1110469 bytes, checksum: f0d46b0ea8125d9d7b00c3e857a7cfd6 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-13T18:36:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DissFSC.pdf: 1110469 bytes, checksum: f0d46b0ea8125d9d7b00c3e857a7cfd6 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-03-10 / Não recebi financiamento / This research has as general objective to analyze the trajectory and the
movement of the agrarian question in the governmental agenda, from 1995 to
2006, based on the application of instruments that show the change in the
priorities of this policy, specifically observing the Presidential Discourses,
Decrees, Provisional Measures and Messages forwarded by the President of the
Republic to the National Congress, based on a multidisciplinary view of public
policies, notably the formation studies in the agenda-setting. The analysis used
here, therefore, focuses on the process of changes in public policies focused on
the governments FHC I and II and Lula I. So, that the objectives are achieved,
this dissertation is based on the model of punctuated equilibrium (Punctuated
Equilibrium Framework) Baumgartner and Jones (1993) which seeks, through
temporal mapping of care indicators, analyze the rise and the changes of an issue
on the government agenda over time. From the above model, will seek to clarify,
explain and discuss the movement of land reform policies over twelve years of
administrations. Thus, is expected to contribute to the studies in the field of public
policies on the agenda of training in Brazil. / Esta pesquisa tem como objetivo geral analisar a trajetória e a movimentação
da questão agrária na agenda governamental, no período compreendido entre
1995 e 2006, apoiando-se na aplicação de instrumentos que demostrem a
mudança nas prioridades dessa política, observando especificamente, os
Discursos Presidenciais, os Decretos, as Medidas Provisórias e as Mensagens
encaminhadas pelo Presidente da República ao Congresso Nacional, a partir de
um olhar multidisciplinar das políticas públicas, notadamente dos estudos de
formação na agenda governamental (agenda-setting). A análise aqui
empregada se debruça, portanto, sobre o processo de mudanças em políticas
públicas com foco nos governos FHC I e II e Lula I. Para que os objetivos sejam
alcançados, essa dissertação tem como base o modelo de Equilíbrio Pontuado
(Punctuated Equilibrium Framework) de Baumgartner e Jones (1993) que busca,
por meio do mapeamento temporal de indicadores de atenção, analisar a
ascensão e as mudanças de uma questão na agenda governamental ao longo
do tempo. A partir do modelo exposto buscaremos explicitar, explicar e
problematizar a movimentação das políticas de reforma agrária ao longo de
doze anos de administrações. Como resultado espera-se contribuir para os
estudos no campo de políticas públicas em especial sobre a formação de
agenda no Brasil.
|
Page generated in 0.0647 seconds