Separation of powers, the rise of liberalism in eighteenth century and flourished in Europe, it curbs excessive concentration of state power through checks and balances, especially focus on the confrontation between each other. Nowadays it has evolved modern constitution contains two parts: the core components of human rights and the framework of separation of powers. Because the traditional theory of separation of powers derived from the distrust which people have the state power and exercise it. These people oppose the right of any advantage, they often confine to the core areas of power, coupled with the abstract of separation of powers principle itself. They are out of date and can not put forward the best and most functional theories. Also, asking national affairs should be played by the best conditions in all aspects of the sector within the organization, functions and the mode of decisions, and achieve the purpose of suppression of state power. In this paper, we analyzed the explanation and its reason of the petition No. 585 by using the traditional constitutional interpretation method to the new functional interpretation and figurative interpretation to interpret the traditional and fixed separation of powers to dynamic separation of powers. The main core of this paper is to probe into the evolution of our constitutional system. Using our current semi-presidentialism contrasts to the German Weimar Constitution which is one of our constitutional origins and is the prototype of semi-presidentialism. Comparing these two constitutions and try to find out the point and bring up recommendations. The essential of the Constitution in line with people¡¦s basic values and emotions; the content of the Constitution is the social status quo which is never qualified. The theories of separation of powers are methods, it aims to pursuit the union of national consciousness. Truth Investigation Committee exposed the lack of crisis management mechanism of Taiwan's constitutional system, once the constitutional authority doesn¡¦t strictly obey the rules, the Constitution has no solution to handle it! What can the Constitution do to face the lack of self-defense function? When the Constitution still follow the practice to define the authority but the result proceeds in opposite ways with public opinion. The constitution is the political law to safeguard human dignity, and it is futurology which can be pursued its objective of logic and it is interpretable. The rulers of Taiwan all want to control the Constitution but not adhere to it. According to this, we broke the stereotypes and reformulated defense mechanism. Even if we left it unused for a hundred years; perhaps we can provide another level of thinking , and give another solution to unconstitutional review for the future.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1970. / eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.

No description available.

No description available.

acase@tulane.edu / Let $G$ be a finite simple graph and let $I = I(G)$ be its edge ideal. Main goal in this thesis is to relate algebraic invariants of powers of edge ideals and combinatorial data of graphs. In particular, we focus on the Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity of an edge ideal and its powers. The first part of this thesis focuses on regularity of edge ideals. In that regard, we give new bounds on the regularity of $I$ when $G$ contains a Hamiltonian path and when $G$ is a Hamiltonian graph. Moreover, we explicitly compute the regularity of unicyclic graphs and characterize the unicyclic graphs with regularity $\nu(G)+1$ and $\nu(G)+2$ where $\nu(G)$ denotes the induced matching number of $G.$ The second problem is on the regularity of powers of edge ideals. Let $R=k[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ be a polynomial ring and let $I \subset R$ be a homogeneous ideal. It is a celebrated result of Cutkosky, Herzog,Trung \cite{CHT}, Kodiyalam \cite{Kodi}, Trung and Wang \cite{TW} that regularity of $I^s$ is asymptotically a linear function for $s \gg 0,$ i.e., $as+b$ for integers $a,b$ and $s_0$ when $s \geq s_0.$ It is known that $a$ is equal to 2 when $I=I(G)$ is the edge ideal of a graph. We then turn on our focus on identifying $b$ and $s_0$ via combinatorial data of the graph $G.$ We explicitly compute the regularity of $I^s$ for all $s\geq 1$ when $G$ is a forest, a cycle and a unicyclic graph. We also present a lower bound on the regularity of powers of edge ideals in terms of the induced matching number of a graph. / 1 / Selvi Beyarslan

Thesis (doctoral)--Friedrich-Alexander-Universität zu Erlangen.

Thesis (J.C.D.)--Catholic University of America, 1929. / Biographical note. Bibliography: p. 140-144.

Thesis (M.A.)--Guo li Taiwan shi fan da xue li shi yan jiu suo. / Mimeo. copy. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis--Judge Advocate General's School, Charlottesville, Va., 1963. / Title from PDF t.p. (LLMC Digital, viewed on May 13, 2010). "April 1963". Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 76-81).

Le statut des dirigeants sociaux en droit de l’OHADA présente une physionomie homogène. Il est rigide dans l’exercice de la direction sociale mais souple dans l’organisation de la direction sociale. La rigidité garantit à la société une direction responsable. En cela, les dirigeants sont dotés de pouvoirs légaux dans le cadre des actes courants pour qu’ils disposent d’une liberté d’action dans la réalisation des buts de la société. Ces pouvoirs connaissent un accroissement sans précédent à cause du déclin des contre-pouvoirs classiquement destinés à les modérer dans le cadre des actes graves. Les dirigeants peuvent donc accomplir valablement des actes graves au mépris des prescriptions qui les encadrent. Face à cet accroissement inquiétant de la souveraineté des dirigeants, les sanctions ont ravi la légitimité aux contre-pouvoirs classiques pour postuler en véritable contre-pouvoir. Les sanctions s’appliquent aux dirigeants chaque fois qu’ils portent atteinte à un intérêt protégé. Leur application s’impose qu’il s’agisse d’actes courants ou graves, qu’il s’agisse de dirigeant associé unique ou non, que la société soit in bonis ou en difficulté, ou encore que le dirigeant soit de droit ou de fait. Mais, la rigidité de la direction ne garantit pas toujours son efficacité. De plus, trop de rigidité tue la rigidité. L’introduction d’une dose de souplesse dans la direction des sociétés peut contribuer à la rendre plus dynamique. Le cadre approprié de cette souplesse est l’organisation de la direction. Ce cadre offre des ressources pour rendre la direction plus performante et très bien structurée. La performance peut être atteinte à travers le renforcement de la direction en la dotant de ressources humaines suffisantes, compétentes et stables. Elle se reflète par le succès de la politique managériale voire les résultats sociaux positifs. Sans doute, une meilleure structuration de la direction contribuerait au même résultat. Certes, la liberté d’organiser la direction est réduite lorsqu’elle porte sur ses structures. Mais cette liberté peut s’exprimer dans le respect de l’ordre public sociétaire. Ainsi, mis à part la nécessité de redéfinir le rapport des structures de l’exécutif des sociétés, il importe de consolider le contrôle des actes des dirigeants en facilitant l’implication d’organes externes à la direction pour aboutir à une gouvernance sociale dynamique. / The manager statute in OHADA law presents a homogeneous face. On the one hand, the statute is rigid in the practice of organization’s manager. This rigidity bases on two fundamental elements : the legal powers of the managers and the judicial sanctions which are applied against the faults of the managers. The powers are increasing because of the saving of their inflexible powers in the ordinary operations and the decline of the classic’s force of opposition witch are making out of protecting the organizations against the serious operations. In front of increasing omnipotence of the managers, the judicial sanctions appear as veritable force of opposition to dissuade and punish the faults of the managers. The sanctions are applying to any faults which are committed in ordinary or grave operations. On the other hand, the statute is flexible in the management’s organization. Generally, this flexibility is real when it is necessary to reinforce or stabilize the management. But, the liberty of the management’s organization is limited when it concerns the structures. The liberty is limited by the necessity to respect the organization’s law. A part of the necessity to review the collaboration between the executive structures, it is important to reinforce the control on the managers operations by facilitating the implication of the extern structures in the organization’s direction to get dynamic governance.