Submitted by Alexandre Soares (alexandredesoares@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-07-19T13:36:17Z No. of bitstreams: 1 xymenes_trindade_fernandes.pdf: 2411935 bytes, checksum: 8b4995774a6e87506c27f7b2f3d13cc2 (MD5) / Rejected by Rodrigo Martins Cruz (rodrigo.cruz@ufvjm.edu.br), reason: Rever: Refer?ncia ABNT Tipo Nota de disserta??o/Tese Resumos Palavra Chave Ag?ncia Financiadora http://acervo.ufvjm.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/559 on 2016-07-21T16:41:45Z (GMT) / Submitted by Alexandre Soares (alexandredesoares@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-08-25T11:55:53Z No. of bitstreams: 1 xymenes_trindade_fernandes.pdf: 2411935 bytes, checksum: 8b4995774a6e87506c27f7b2f3d13cc2 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Rodrigo Martins Cruz (rodrigo.cruz@ufvjm.edu.br) on 2016-08-25T14:24:21Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 xymenes_trindade_fernandes.pdf: 2411935 bytes, checksum: 8b4995774a6e87506c27f7b2f3d13cc2 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-25T14:24:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 xymenes_trindade_fernandes.pdf: 2411935 bytes, checksum: 8b4995774a6e87506c27f7b2f3d13cc2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 / O Programa de Interven??o Pedag?gica II (PIP II) ? tem?tica dessa pesquisa que materializou-se na Escola Estadual Professor Leopoldo Miranda (EEPLM), em Diamantina ? MG, vinculada ? Linha de Pesquisa Pol?ticas P?blicas e Educacionais, teve, como objetivo geral analisar a efetividade do Programa de Interven??o Pedag?gica II na Escola Estadual Professor Leopoldo Miranda, no per?odo de 2011 a 2013. Os objetivos espec?ficos oportunizaram: conhecer o Programa de Interven??o Pedag?gica II na Escola Estadual Professor Leopoldo Miranda no per?odo de 2011 a 2013; analisar a efetividade do PIP II com base no Guia de Organiza??o e Reorganiza??o do PIP 2013; e analisar os elementos que dificultaram a efetividade do PIP II na EEPLM. Quanto ? natureza e abordagem metodol?gica, essa pesquisa ? qualitativa, possuindo caracter?sticas metodol?gicas descritivas e anal?ticas. Apresenta-se por um estudo de caso, tendo, como t?cnica, a pesquisa documental, utilizando a an?lise de conte?do para interpreta??o dos dados. A delimita??o da pesquisa deu-se no 9? ano do Ensino Fundamental por ser nessa fase de ensino a ocorr?ncia de avalia??o pelo Programa de Avalia??o da Rede P?blica da Educa??o B?sica (PROEB) que subsidia a organiza??o e reorganiza??o do PIP II nas escolas. Os resultados obtidos mostram o desenvolvimento de a??es pela escola, visando atender as necessidades para que o ensino-aprendizagem acontecesse com ?xito, por?m evidenciaram-se quest?es dificultadoras do processo de ensino-aprendizagem relacionadas ? falta de comprometimento dos alunos com os estudos e a pouca participa??o da fam?lia, ? indisciplina, ? viol?ncia e ao comprometimento do professor, ? orienta??es pedag?gicas equivocadas por parte de inspetor escolar, ? dificuldade na utiliza??o do Curr?culo B?sico Comum, ao fracasso na efetiva??o da interdisciplinaridade, ao privil?gio no atendimento ?s disciplinas de Matem?tica e L?ngua Portuguesa em detrimento das demais, ?s dificuldades na participa??o dos alunos na avali??o do PROEB, ao grande quantitativo de alunos em progress?o parcial, ?s a??es do PIP II voltadas para o treinamento de habilidades e compet?ncias, ao n?mero reduzido de analistas para o atendimento ?s escolas, ?s dificuldade de acesso aos munic?pios pelos analistas, ?s caracter?sticas e dimens?es territoriais, ?s condi??es socioecon?micas dos alunos, ? falta de recursos para o desenvolvimento do trabalho, ? aus?ncia de diagn?stico da realidade para implementa??o de pol?ticas p?blicas, a desvaloriza??o dos profissionais da educa??o, ?s condi??es prec?rias de trabalho nas escolas, ? viol?ncia dos alunos contra professores, diretores e colegas de classe, ? valoriza??o de avalia??o quantitativa em detrimento da qualitativa, ? aus?ncia de forma??o interdisciplinar para os professores e equipe pedag?gica, e, ainda, sobrecarga de trabalho, tanto para os professores, quanto para os analistas do PIP II. A hip?tese levantada nessa pesquisa confirmou-se, ou seja, o Programa de Interven??o Pedag?gica II n?o se mostrou efetivo, uma vez que n?o houve melhoria para os alunos do 9? ano em rela??o ao ensino de qualidade, / Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Gest?o de Institui??es Educacionais, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, 2015. / The Educational Intervention Program II (PIP II), is theme of this research that materialized at the State School Professor Leopoldo Miranda (EEPLM) in Diamantina - MG, linked to the Research Line of Public Policy and Education, aimed to: analyze the effectiveness of Pedagogical Intervention Program II at the State School Professor Leopoldo Miranda in the period from 2011 to 2013. The specific objectives gives opportunity to know the Pedagogical Intervention Program II at the State School Professor Leopoldo Miranda in the period from 2011 to 2013; analyze the effectiveness of PIP II based on the Organization and Reorganization guide of the PIP 2013; and analyze the elements that hampered the effectiveness of PIP II in EEPLM. About the nature and methodological approach this research is qualitative, having descriptive and analytical methodological characteristics. It is presented by a case study, with the documentary research technique using the content analysis to analysis and interpretation of data. The delimitations of the research took place in the 9th grade of elementary school to be in this educational stage the occurrence of evaluation by the evaluation program of the Public Network in the Basic Education (PROEB) that supports the organization and reorganization of the PIP II in schools. The results show the development of actions by the school, to meet the needs for the teaching and learning happen successfully, but it became clear cause difficulties issues of the teaching-learning process related to the lack of commitment of students with the studies and the little family participation, the indiscipline , violence and the teacher commitment, misleading pedagogical guidelines by the school inspector, the difficulty in using the Common Basic Curriculum to fail in the execution of the interdisciplinarity, the privilege in attendance ace of math and Portuguese to the detriment of others, the difficulties in students' participation in the Evaluation of the PROEB, the large quantitative of students in partial progress, the actions of PIP II focused to the training of skills and competences, the small number of analysts to attend the schools, the difficult of access to municipalities by analysts, the characteristics and territorial dimensions, the socio economic conditions of the students, lack of resources to the development work, the absence of diagnostic of the reality for implementation of public policies, devaluation of education professionals, the poor working conditions in schools, violence by the students against teachers, principals and classmates, the appreciation of quantitative evaluation over the qualitative, the lack of interdisciplinary training for teachers and teaching staff and also work overload for both teachers and analysts of PIP II. The raised hypothesis in this study was confirmed. So The Pedagogical Intervention program II was not effective, since there was no improvement to the students of the 9th grade in relation to quality education