京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(医学) / 甲第22311号 / 医博第4552号 / 新制||医||1040(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院医学研究科医学専攻 / (主査)教授 福原 俊一, 教授 坂井 義治, 教授 妹尾 浩 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Medical Science / Kyoto University / DFAM

Adjusting for baseline pre-intervention characteristics between treatment groups, through the use of propensity score matching methods, is an important step that enables researchers to do causal inference with confidence. This is critical, largely, due to the fact that practical treatment allocation scenarios are non-randomized in nature, with various inherent biases that are inevitable, and therefore requiring such experimental manipulations. These propensity score matching methods are the available tools to be used as control mechanisms, for such intrinsic system biases in causal studies, without the benefits of randomization (Lane, To, Kyna , & Robin, 2012). Certain assumptions need to be verifiable or met, before one may embark on a propensity score matching causal effects journey, using the Rubin causal model (Holland, 1986), of which the main ones are conditional independence (unconfoundedness) and common support (positivity). In particular, with this dissertation we are concerned with elaborating the applications of these matching methods, for a ‘strong-ignorability’ case (Rosenbaum & Rubin, 1983), i.e. when both the overlap and unconfoundedness properties are valid. We will take a journey from explaining different experimental designs and how the treatment effect is estimated, closing with a practical example based on two cohorts of enrolled introductory statistics students prior and post-clickers intervention, at a public South African university, and the relevant causal conclusions thereof. Keywords: treatment, conditional independence, propensity score, counterfactual, confounder, common support / Dissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2020. / Statistics / MSc / Unrestricted

The aim of this exploratory study was to determine whether there was any significance to the proposition that the ability of individuals to assess entrepreneurial risks differed between entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs, with a particular focus on the risk identification and risk prioritisation abilities.A survey strategy was followed which made use of a case study exercise to ascertain what risks the sample groups of entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs identified. Demographics and other risk variables, such as risk propensity and risk perception, were also excluded to provide context and eliminate certain alternative explanations.No significant differences were found between entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs with respect the risks that they identified in the case study exercise. Entrepreneurs perceived the case study as more favourable and had a higher risk propensity. Entrepreneurs also found the case study exercise more difficult than non-entrepreneurs. / Dissertation (MBA)--University of Pretoria, 2012. / Gordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS) / unrestricted

Policies delegating control of educational policy to the local level are widespread, yet there has been little examination of the effects of such distributed decision making in the area of advanced education programming. We used propensity score matching to examine the effectiveness of locally developed policies for identifying intellectually gifted children identifying themselves as Black or from low-socioeconomic backgrounds across one large U.S. state (Florida) that has a state-level gifted education mandate. Ongoing underrepresentation of traditionally marginalized groups in gifted education was evident, even among districts with policies specifically designed to ameliorate disproportional representation. However, the presence of such a policy reduced the degree of underrepresentation.

Objective: The study assesses the impact of dual enrollment participation on remediation and completion for traditional first time, full-time freshmen at a community college in Northeast Tennessee. Method: This study began with the full population of 1,232 students who enrolled between 2008 and 2012 at a community college in northeast Tennessee the fall semester after finishing high school. The population was required to have American College Testing (ACT) scores, completely fill out the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), enroll full-time as a degree-seeking student, and complete the first fall semester. Propensity score matching was utilized to eliminate self-selection bias and enable parametric comparisons using optimal matching of dual enrollment participants and non-participants while controlling for a range of covariates. Results: The analyses showed that community college students who participated in dual enrollment were (a) 9% or nearly 3.4 times less likely to take remediation, (b) 26% or nearly 2.5 times more likely to graduate in 2 years, and (c) 28% or nearly 1.5 times more likely to graduate in 3 years. Contributions: This study contributes to the literature showing that dual enrollment reduces remediation rates and assists in timely completions for community college students. Policy recommendations are to increase equitable participation, normalize dual enrollment for students academically able to do college coursework, align state terminology with the nation, and improve data for future research.

京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(社会健康医学) / 甲第19636号 / 社医博第69号 / 新制||社医||9(附属図書館) / 32672 / 京都大学大学院医学研究科社会健康医学系専攻 / (主査)教授 佐藤 俊哉, 教授 今中 雄一, 教授 小西 郁生 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Public Health / Kyoto University / DFAM

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.