prepared by Chu Yan-kit. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1999. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 125-145). / Abstract also in Chinese. / Acknowledgments --- p.iii-iv / List of Tables and Figures --- p.vii-ix / List of Abbreviations --- p.x / Abstract --- p.xi-xiv / Chapter Chapter One: --- Introduction --- p.1-39 / Chapter 1.1 --- Scope and Purpose --- p.1-2 / Chapter 1.2 --- Literature Review --- p.3-18 / Chapter 1.2.1 --- Public Budgeting Researches in Hong Kong --- p.3-4 / Chapter 1.2.2 --- On-Hand Budgeting Theories --- p.5-12 / Chapter 1.2.3 --- Neo-Institutional Approach --- p.13-18 / Chapter 1.3 --- Conceptualization --- p.19-27 / Chapter 1.3.1 --- Premises of the Explanatory Model --- p.19 / Chapter 1.3.2 --- Rationale of the Model --- p.20-27 / Chapter 1.4 --- Operationalization --- p.28-36 / Chapter 1.4.1 --- Working Definitions --- p.28-29 / Chapter 1.4.2 --- Operationalization of the Research --- p.29-32 / Chapter 1.4.3 --- Indicators and Hypotheses --- p.32-34 / Chapter 1.4.4 --- Methodology --- p.35-36 / Chapter 1.5 --- Organization of the Research --- p.37 / Notes --- p.38-39 / Chapter Chapter Two： --- The Background --- p.40-69 / Chapter 2.1 --- Characteristics of the Colonial Public Finance System & Marco-Economic Context for the Public Finance System --- p.40-47 / Chapter 2.1.1 --- Revenue Aspect of the Public Finance System --- p.40-41 / Chapter 2.1.2 --- Expenditure Aspect of the Public Finance System 42- --- p.47 / Chapter 2.2 --- Macro Economic Context for the Two Institutional Levels from the 1970s to the 1990s --- p.48-53 / Chapter 2.2.1 --- Financially Non-Stringent & Stringent Periods for the First Level Institutions --- p.48-50 / Chapter 2.2.2 --- Non-Hostile & Hostile Periods for the Second Level Institutions --- p.51-53 / Chapter 2.3 --- Composition and Characteristics of the Actors in the Two Institutional Levels --- p.54-59 / Chapter 2.3.1 --- Actors in the First Level Institutions and the Second Level Institutions --- p.54 / Chapter 2.3.2 --- Superior Position of the Policy A ctors / the Star Chamber over the Administrative Departments in Public Finance --- p.54-59 / Chapter 2.4 --- Institutional Setting in the First Level Institutions and the Second Level Institutions --- p.59-62 / Chapter 2.4.1 --- Institutional-Setting of the First Level Institutions --- p.59-61 / Chapter 2.4.2 --- Institutional-Setting of the Second Level Institutions --- p.62 / Notes --- p.63-69 / Chapter Chapter Three: --- Analysis of First Level Institutions --- p.70-84 / Chapter 3.1 --- Crown Land Leasing Manipulation --- p.71-75 / Chapter 3.1.1 --- Official Depiction by the Policy Actors --- p.71-72 / Chapter 3.1.2 --- Temporal Land Sale Patterns --- p.73-75 / Chapter 3.2 --- Manipulation on the Operation of Colonial Taxation System --- p.76-83 / Chapter 3.2.1 --- Adherence of How Tax Regime --- p.76-78 / Chapter 3.2.2 --- Manipulation of the Content of Tax Reform by the Policy Actors --- p.79 / Chapter 3.2.3 --- "The Importance of Indirect Tax, Fees & Charges and Fund Recovery in Government Revenue Extraction" --- p.80-83 / Notes --- p.84 / Chapter Chapter Four: --- Analysis of Second Level Institutions --- p.85-114 / Chapter 4.1 --- "Budget Patterns of the Delivery Agency, the Regulatory Agency & the Delivery / Trading Agency" --- p.87-96 / Chapter 4.1.1 --- Budget Patterns of the Delivery Agency 一 LD --- p.87-89 / Chapter 4.1.2 --- Budget Patterns of the Regulatory Agencies ´ؤ TDD and PD --- p.90-92 / Chapter 4.1.3 --- Budget Patterns of the Delivery / Trading Agency - HA &HD --- p.93-96 / Chapter 4.2 --- "Budget Patterns of the Taxing Agencies - FR, IRD, R&V, TR and AD" --- p.97-102 / Chapter 4.3 --- "Budget Patterns f or the Transfer/Regulatory Agency, the Servicing Agency and the Trading Agency" --- p.103-112 / Chapter 4.3.1 --- "Budget Patterns of the Regulatory / Transfer Agencies - PELB & WB, TB and HB" --- p.103-105 / Chapter 4.3.2 --- Budget Patterns of the Servicing Agency - HRD --- p.106-107 / Chapter 4.3.3 --- Budget Patterns of the Trading Agency - LDC --- p.108-112 / Notes --- p.113-114 / Chapter Chapter Five: --- Conclusion & Discussion --- p.115-120 / Appendices --- p.121-124 / Chapter I. --- Profile of Interviewees --- p.121 / Chapter II. --- Interview Questions for the Land & Housing Administrative Departments --- p.122 / Chapter III. --- Interview Questions for Finance Committee of the LegCo --- p.123 / Chapter IV. --- Interview Questions for the Housing Branch --- p.124 / References --- p.125-145 / Chapter A. --- "Economy, Society and Politics of Hong Kong" --- p.125-128 / Chapter B. --- Government Document and Interview Material --- p.129-132 / Chapter C. --- Local Budgetary Researches and Local Public Finance Material --- p.133-137 / Chapter D. --- Budgetary Theories and Neo-Institutionalism --- p.138-145

The Mental Health Memories project is an online archive created in order to display and preserve the personal histories of those with mental health experiences. The project aims to fill a void in available material culture related to the history of mental health and its preservation. Participants’ contributions include: oral histories, personal items, documents, and audio. Bringing together multimedia sources, the MHMemories website allows for the preservation of these items and stories through the digitization of contributions. This method allows for participants’ items to stay in their possession while also becoming part of the archive. In order to recruit participants, the Mental Health Memories project teamed up with the Psychiatric Stories Archive, based at California State University San Bernardino, and the San Bernardino County Behavioral Health Clubhouse. Three collection days facilitated the gathering of materials. The final product is the MHMemories.org/.com website which showcases the contributions of participants. The Mental Health Memories project helps to illustrate the diversity of mental health experiences.

The Castillo de San Marcos is the oldest stone fortification on the North American mainland, a unique site that integrates Florida’s Spanish colonial past with American Indian narratives. A complete history of this fortification from its origins to its management under the National Park Service has not yet been written. During the Spanish colonial era, the Indian mission system complemented the defensive work of the fort until imperial skirmishes led to the demise of the Florida Indian. During the nineteenth century, Indian prisoners put a new American Empire on display while the fort transformed into a tourist destination. The Castillo became an American site, and eventually a National Monument, where visitors lionized Spanish explorers and often overlooked other players in fort history. This thesis looks at the threads of Spanish and Indian history at the fort and how they have or have not been interpreted into the twenty-first century.

This thesis examines how sovereign lending, i.e. the practice of lending capital to sovereigns, has changed since the early nineteenth century. It tackles this question by investigating how lenders have thought about sovereigns for the past two centuries, focusing on the tools they have used to know and represent them. I argue that there was a critical shift in the early twentieth century in terms of the kinds of knowledge lenders deployed to know sovereigns. This shift differentiates the old sovereign lending from the new. In the old sovereign lending, merchant banking families such as the Rothschilds knew sovereigns through intensely personal relations based on gentility, whereas in the new sovereign lending, joint stock banks, credit rating agencies and international institutions largely came to know sovereigns through statistics. Though difficult to imagine nowadays, the description of sovereigns through quantifiable facts (the original definition of 'statistics') was revolutionary for early twentieth century lenders. Despite constituting the origins of sovereign credit ratings, this key shift has been overlooked in all major studies about sovereign debt. The new sovereign lending rose to prominence from the interwar period to the 1970s and now defines our world. The identification of this crucial shift is based on the development and application of the concept of forms of knowledge. Forms of knowledge refer to enduring ways of knowing and representing the constituent units of the international system used by international practitioners (e.g. diplomats, military strategists, financiers, and international lawyers). Examples of forms of knowledge include, but are not limited to, modern cartography, international treaties, statistics, gentility, and heraldry. The use of this concept is that it leads to a better understanding of how international practitioners and their practices undergo radical changes. In so doing, it provides a firmer empirical grasp on the question of how fundamental discontinuities arise in international relations.

This thesis illustrates the accomplishments and challenges of enhancing accessibility across the national parks, at the same time that great need to diversify the parks and their interpretation of American disability history remains. Chapters describe the administrative history of the NPS Accessibility Program (1979-present), exploring the decisions from both within and outside the federal agency, to break physical and programmatic barriers to make parks more inclusive for people with sensory, physical, and cognitive disabilities; and provide a case study of the Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic Site (HOFR) in New York. The case study describes the creation of HOFR as a house museum and national historic site, with a particular focus on the history of the site’s accessibility features; considers existing barriers; and makes recommendations for programmatic changes to improve the experience for disabled and nondisabled visitors. By collaborating with and learning from nearby organizations by and for people with disabilities, HOFR can serve as a model for other historic house museums in how to effectively interpret “disability stories.” Contemplating how the National Park Service has interpreted the histories and heritage of other historically marginalized communities through theme studies, on-site interpretation, and public history scholarship yields lessons for how best to interpret disability history and depict nuanced representations of the varied disability communities living in the U.S. The inclusion of “disability stories” and representation of people with disabilities in the past will help foster deeper connections with and welcome diverse visitors to the parks.

Von historischen und kulturellen Konzeptionen strukturiert, durch politische Grenzen zerstückelt und geprägt von Kooperation und Konflikten sind Grenzräume ein komplexer Untersuchungsgegenstand. Der vorliegende Band versammelt geschichtswissenschaftliche, soziologische, ethnologische und informationswissenschaftliche Zugänge in zwölf Einzelbeiträgen und einer Schreibdiskussion. Neben theoretisch-methodischen Überlegungen stehen epochen- und auch disziplinübergreifend europäische Grenzräume im Fokus. Die Beiträge des Bandes analysieren diese Raum- und Grenzkonzeptionen empirisch fundiert mit Blick auf die soziale Konstruktion des Raums, die rechtlichen Verknüpfungen, die Alltagspraxis der Grenze, die Ausprägungen von Geschichtsbewusstsein und Geschichtskultur und die Inklusions- und Exklusionsdynamiken in verschiedenen Epochen. / Borderlands are a complex subject to study. They are structured by various historical and cultural conceptions, fragmented by political borders, and shaped by cooperation and conflict. This volume brings together different approaches from history, sociology, ethnology, and information science. It includes twelve individual contributions and a writing discussion. In addition to theoretical-methodological considerations, the volume focuses specifically on European borderlands across epochs and disciplines. The empirical contributions in this volume analyse conceptions of space and borders with special regard to the social construction of space, legal linkages, praxeology of the border, formation of historical consciousness and historical culture as well as the dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in different epochs.

Museums Connect stands at the intersection of public history and public diplomacy. The program, which has both public history and public diplomacy agendas, is sponsored by the United States Department of State and administered by the American Alliance of Museums. This dissertation examines the competing impulses of transnational public history and public diplomacy made manifest in Museums Connect and its ramifications for public history theory and practice. The project demonstrates both the seeming similarities between public history’s ideas of shared authority, dialogic museum practice, and community engagement and public diplomacy’s “people-to-people” diplomacy, as well as the limits of these similarities. This dissertation also considers the ramifications of these dynamics on museum and public history practice and theory. It is shown that the assumptions of public diplomacy found in Museums Connect inform the program’s structure and operation, while also precluding a truly shared authority between the American museums and their international partners. The appointment of the American museums as “lead” museums and the Department of State’s choice to focus on young people as the target audience for the program foregrounds didactic relationships between the museums and their “communities” for the projects. Through three case studies of Museums Connect projects between the United States and Afghanistan, Morocco, and South Africa, this dissertation challenges the seminal theoretical literature of public history, articulated in Michael Frisch’s A Shared Authority, that interpretive and meaning-making authority in public history is inherently shared. Each case study reveals different factors that either promote or preclude more balanced power dynamics between the museums and their communities within the broader power dynamics established by the grant. Staff reflection-in-action, project activity and partner museum choice, and the non-American public history and museological contexts are all revealed to uniquely influence the dynamics between the museums and their communities. Throughout, the agency of the non-American participants, highlighted through the responses and reactions to the unequal dynamics of the projects, complicates notions of the singular democratic public sphere that underpin the paradigm of the museum as forum.

This dissertation examines how popular experiences of nature and history in the British Columbia Interior were structured by automobility – the system of objects, spaces, images, and practices that surrounded private automobiles and public roads. The Fordist state poured massive resources into the provincial road network during the period 1920 to 1970, and in the process created new possibilities for leisure and for profit. Motoring was a new, very modern way of experiencing BC, and also an important economic engine. Making the province’s highways and the landscapes that were visible alongside them look appealing to the motoring public became a matter of concern for many different parties. Boosters, businesses, and tourism promoters who stood to benefit from increased automobile travel often cultivated roadside attractions and lobbied the state to do the same. Starting in the early 1940s, the provincial government established numerous parks along the Interior highway network: the two examined here are Manning and Hamber parks. Beginning in the late 1950s it did the same with historical sites: Barkerville, Fort Steele, and several others are examined here. These and other parks and historic sites were established, developed, and managed as roadside amenities, and were used to deliver lessons about nature and history to the motoring public ‘by the road.’ Drawing on a wide range of examples from across the BC Interior, including both successes and failures, this thesis examines how the motoring public’s common landscape experiences were shaped by state-built infrastructure and by various groups’ efforts to manage, manipulate, and modify the landscapes that were visible by the road. / Thesis (Ph.D, History) -- Queen's University, 2012-12-12 23:49:31.501

This thesis addresses two key problems: that historical practice in the academy is largely disengaged from politics as a domain of public purpose and that policymaking remains fixed on a very narrow (and quantitative) definition of evidence, although the “policy-relevant” disciplines have not proved able to solve long-standing policy issues. It inspects both phenomena with the aim of describing the space in which the two problems can be brought into a workable accommodation. The argument is made that public policy should be regarded as an important concern of academic history, and policymakers themselves as people with legitimate interests that historians should take seriously. Public history provides a helpful framework and set of concerns to work with in this respect. Given that the social and natural sciences have not been able to solve the pressing policy problems with which governments are faced, a certain obligation may be claimed for historians to reconsider their stance. The re-connection of history and policy – the nineteenth-century discipline clearly discerned a public-political purpose for history – requires attention to be given to articulating and demonstrating the distinctive cognitive tools of the historian and their distinctive value to the policymaking process. The thesis addresses two primary fields, whose interests and professional practices appear divergent such that both the principles and the terms of collaboration are difficult to imagine: academic history and government policymaking. The primary material on which the research draws is accordingly the products of these constituencies: works of historiography and policy documents of various kinds. Also of relevance are commentaries and analyses that address these domains, whether from other disciplines with an interest in political decision-making, from the media or from other organisations with a professional stake, such as think tanks. The originality of the research lies in conceiving of the question of the uses of history for public policy as one of integration of “supply” and “demand” perspectives. It seeks clarity on the distinctive value of historical skills and approaches, but not as an end in itself. Rather, the case is assembled for the affinities between history and policy as processes and hence that the two can be brought into a productive alignment. So, instead of history providing pre-packaged accounts for policy, it can be embedded as a way of thinking and reasoning in policy.

The period from 1294 until 1307 saw England engaged in wars with the French, the Welsh and the Scotch. In only three years, 1299, 1302, and 1305 was there no campaign. The object of this dissertation is to examine the ways in which the country was mobilised for this exceptional military effort, and to investigate the means by which the wars were financed. Various aspects of both the military and administrative history of this period have been dealt with by Tout, Morris and others, but much of the surviving evidence has not been fully used, and no historian has attempted to treat the subject as a whole.