Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-02T19:50:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2046.pdf: 6359765 bytes, checksum: c0820f65f928c23254f36b2b61137db2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-06-30 / What has changed regarding personnel management in Brazil since the nomination of the concept of moral harassment ? The search of an answer to this question induced the development of this doctorate thesis, which the subject is moral harassment and its purpose being the qualification of this concept in the country and its objective the investigation of its impact in managerial practices in Brazilian organizations. The work supported on the hypothesis that this nomination, transforming individual complaint in organizational phenomenon has provoked changes in the perception of Brazilian society. Consequently, the study focused on the analysis of the sources of its qualification, in the logic of transformation from individual complaint into organizational phenomenon, in the dynamic practices qualified as moral harassment, in the presuppositions of manipulation, in instruments of contemporary corporate justice and in fundaments for evaluating workers. The results were obtained from the analysis of empirical material, collected from written and electronic communications sources, for the periods between 1983 and 2006. The analysis has proved that the most relevant impact of creating this legal notion, in the Brazilian organizational scope, was the escalation of public denunciation from the year 2000 onwards, seeking indemnification for the damage caused by these managerial practices. / O que mudou na gestão de pessoas no Brasil a partir da nomeação do conceito assédio moral? A busca de resposta a essa indagação instigou o desenvolvimento desta tese cujo tema é o assédio moral, sendo seu objeto a qualificação do conceito no país e seu objetivo a investigação de seus impactos nas práticas de gestão nas organizações brasileiras. O trabalho apoiou-se na hipótese de que essa nomeação, ao transformar a queixa individual em fenômeno organizacional, produziu mudanças na percepção da sociedade brasileira. Para tanto, o foco do estudo residiu na análise das raízes da sua qualificação, na lógica da transformação de uma queixa individual em fenômeno organizacional, na dinâmica das práticas qualificadas como assédio moral, nos pressupostos da manipulação, nos instrumentos contemporâneos de justiça organizacional e nos fundamentos para a classificação do trabalhador. Os resultados foram obtidos a partir da análise do material empírico, coletado junto à mídia de grande circulação, impressa e eletrônica, relativo ao período de 1983 a 2006. A análise comprovou que o impacto mais relevante da criação dessa figura jurídica no Brasil, no âmbito gerencial, foi a intensificação da denúncia pública, a partir de 2000, em busca da reparação do dano decorrente das referidas práticas gerenciais.

La justice pénale a historiquement, et à juste titre, été l’affaire de l’État. Octroyer à l’autorité publique le monopole de l’administration de la justice permet entre autres d’harmoniser les rapports sociaux tout en assurant une réponse structurée et dépersonnalisée au phénomène criminel. La confiance du public dans sa capacité d’accomplir judicieusement cette tâche est cruciale au maintien de ce monopole. Certaines réalités découlant du contexte médiatique moderne mettent toutefois en lumière une certaine crise de confiance du public dans l’appareil judiciaire et contribuent à déposséder l’État de son monopole sur l’administration de la justice pénale. Nous estimons que la télédiffusion des procédures judiciaires pénales de première instance est un des moyens par lesquels l’autorité publique peut rapatrier ce monopole. Ce mémoire s’intéressa à certains aspects de ces questions. / The State has historically overseen criminal justice, and with good reason. Delegating to state authorities full and exclusive administration of criminal justice ensures social harmony and allows for a structured and depersonalised response to crime. Public confidence in its ability to effectively do so is however crucial. The current media environment has contributed to a crisis of confidence in the system, depriving the State of its monopoly. We believe televising court proceedings and making them widely available to the public is one of the ways by which the State can strengthen confidence and reaffirm its legitimate control on the administration of criminal justice.