No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether altering an informed consent document (ICD), in ways that either promote or inhibit accessibility, would affect potential participants’ willingness to participate in a child development laboratory-based study. Specifically, I was interested in assessing the willingness to participate of historically underrepresented groups, especially Appalachian caregiver-child dyads. I altered three parameters of a previously approved and employed ICD to explore whether these parameters impacted Appalachian caregivers’ comprehension of the study, willingness to participate, and trust in the researchers. The manipulated parameters included reading level, utilization of illustrative pictures, and inclusion of text-to-speech audio conversions. I utilized a 2x2x2 fully between-subjects factorial design to assess the main and interaction effects of manipulating the ICD reading level, the presence or absence of pictures on the ICD, and the incorporation or non-incorporation of text-to-speech on participants’ comprehension, willingness to participate, and trust in the researcher. One-hundred and twenty-two participants responded to the online survey. After filtering the responses for participants that met inclusion criteria, the sample included 18 primarily White Appalachian caregivers. I conducted a series of independent samples t-tests to evaluate the main effects of the three parameters of accessibility on participant comprehension, willingness to participate, and trust in researchers. The present study revealed one significant effect of reading level on trust in researchers. All other effects were nonsignificant. An investigation of this kind provides new information concerning informed consent design. Future research should further investigate the influence of accessibility in informed consent, namely with larger sample sizes.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of affect on privacy concerns and privacy behaviors. A considerable amount of research in the information systems field argues that privacy concerns, usually conceptualized as an evaluation of privacy risks, influence privacy behaviors. However, recent theoretical work shows that affect, a pre-cognitive evaluation, has a significant effect on preferences and choices in risky situations. Affect is contrasted with cognitive issues in privacy decision making and the role of affective versus cognitive-consequentialist factors is reviewed in privacy context. A causal model was developed to address how affect influences privacy concerns and privacy behaviors. The model of privacy risk proposed in this model argues that affect (or “feelings”) influences privacy behaviors directly as well as thru privacy concerns. To test the model, subjects were recruited using Mechanical Turk and paid for their participation. Affect, the key construct in this research, was measured using a word association technique as well as methods developed in the implicit attitudes research. Well-known scales were used to measure privacy concerns and behavioral intentions. Data was collected from subjects using a pretested privacy scenario. Data analysis suggests that, in line with published IS research, privacy concerns affect privacy behaviors. Affect has no impact on privacy concerns nor on privacy behaviors at the traditional 5% level of significance, though it is significant at the 10% level of significance. Improving the instruments used to measure affect, use of a large sample size to detect small effect sizes and more control over the instrument administration instead of an online survey are suggested for future research.