Thesis advisor: Robert J. Starratt / Recent federal and state mandates have tasked school systems to move beyond principal evaluation as a bureaucratic function and to re-imagine it as a critical component to improve principal performance and compel school renewal. This qualitative study investigated the district leaders' and principals' perceptions of the performance evaluation process and criteria by which the effectiveness of principals was judged in a small, urban, New England school district. In an effort to assist the New England School District to create a more authentic principal evaluation process, district document analysis, literature review, interview transcripts and survey data were used to make recommendations to district leaders regarding four major themes including fairness, feedback, process and critical aspects. The themes were discussed in the context of schools as complex systems, where trust and distributive leadership drive school renewal. Emerging from the study of principal and superintendent perceptions of the process and criteria for evaluation, recommendations include: make principal evaluation an ongoing process; schedule time in each building; clearly identify criteria and supportive evidence; standardize rubrics and evaluation instrument; use evaluation instrument and feedback mechanisms that recognizes complexity of the principalship; provide meaningful feedback; and base summative evaluation on goals for personal-professional improvement and growth. / Thesis (EdD) — Boston College, 2012. / Submitted to: Boston College. Lynch School of Education. / Discipline: Educational Administration and Higher Education.

Thesis advisor: Marilyn Cochran-Smith / This practitioner research longitudinal study examines the effects of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law and the Race To The Top (RTTT) initiative on a high performing middle school in Massachusetts between 2003 and 2013. Utilizing a theoretical framework that combines Cochran-Smith and Lytles (2009) "inquiry as stance" and Ball's concept of (1990b) "policy cycles," the study analyzes the programmatic and structural changes enacted in response to NCLB, RTTT and their effects on special education and low income students, their teachers, parents, and the principal. The study's findings show that federal mandates and related state regulations placed unrealistic, unfair and unreasonable demands on students, teachers and the school. Staff often felt as if we were riding on a rollercoaster. Massachusetts' rating of "High" and "Very High" performance on the state test contrasted with the NCLB school report cards that labeled the school as in need of "improvement," "corrective action," and eventually "restructuring" because of the failure of special education or low income students to meet constantly rising targets. NCLB's and RTTT's requirements caused the school to prioritize courses providing remediation in tested subjects--English language arts and mathematics--reducing the availability of related arts classes and thereby narrowing the curriculum. The school's obsessive focus on the annual state tests produced an atmosphere of anxiety for all stakeholders. Unwanted changes in the school culture eventually generated a schoolwide movement to resist the obsession with testing, reduce anxiety and expand interdisciplinary learning. The study concludes with recommendations for further research of the effects of federal mandates on "good" schools across the US. It recommends that policymakers recognize that "one size fits all" school reform is detrimental to public schools and calls for the recognition of local knowledge in the making of policy. A further recommendation encourages school leaders to study their own practice, becoming practitioner researchers for the benefit of their schools. / Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2014. / Submitted to: Boston College. Lynch School of Education. / Discipline: Teacher Education, Special Education, Curriculum and Instruction.

I EU råder det idag en tänkt etableringsfrihet för företag inom gemenskapen. EUD har genom ett antal avgörande domar gett en bild av hur tolkningen av den stadgade etableringsfriheten ska ske. På grund av etableringsfriheten och EUDs praxis genom åren har möjligheter kommit upp för medlemsstater att konkurrera med varandra för att erhålla den bästa lagstiftningen för bolag att starta upp sin verksamhet i. Vissa förespråkare anser att möjligheten till regelkonkurrens riskerar att försämra medlemsstaternas bolagsregler ur ett arbetstagarperspektiv då medlemsstaterna i framtiden kommer att utforma lagar som är förmånliga för bolagen men med ett sämre skydd för arbetstagare, ett såkallat race to the bottom. Andra menar att regelkonkurrens tvärt om stärker den inre europeiska marknaden då medlemsstaterna aktivt strävar efter att utforma de bästa lagarna ur allas perspektiv och att en sådan konkurrens behövs inom gemenskapen för att aktivt lyfta och utveckla kvalitén på medlemsstaternas bolagsregler, ett såkallat race to the top. Inom EU diskuteras idag förslag till ett gemensamt privat europeiskt aktiebolag (SPE-bolag) som ska gälla inom hela EU och där bolagsreglerna är desamma i alla medlemsstater. Gemensam harmonisering bland medlemsstaterna kan tänkas motverka en negativ utveckling av regelkonkurrensen (race to the bottom med försämrat arbetstagarskydd som följd) men kan även medföra att den goda utvecklingen som kan ske genom fri regelkonkurrens mellan nationella bolagsregler stannar upp bland medlemsstaterna. Vad gäller SPE-bolaget så motverkar inte det möjligheten för negativ regelkonkurrens mellan medlemsstaterna ur ett arbetstagarskyddsperspektiv utan snarare öppnar upp för mer negativ regelkonkurrens. En möjlighet till god regelkonkurrens bland medlemsstaterna utan att konsekvenserna av att ett race to the bottom skulle uppstå är att den europeiske lagstiftaren utfärdar en gemensam arbetstagarskyddslagstiftning vilket alla medlemsstater måste följa. En sådan lagstiftning skulle reglera alla väsentliga arbetsrättsområden som skulle kunna förbises om en negativ regelkonkurrens skulle utvecklas mellan medlemsstaterna. Därefter skulle det råda en fri regelkonkurrens. En sådan lösning skulle ta de bra delarna ur regelkonkurrens samtidigt som de negativa delarna förhindrades.

<p>I EU råder det idag en tänkt etableringsfrihet för företag inom gemenskapen. EUD har genom ett antal avgörande domar gett en bild av hur tolkningen av den stadgade etableringsfriheten ska ske. På grund av etableringsfriheten och EUDs praxis genom åren har möjligheter kommit upp för medlemsstater att konkurrera med varandra för att erhålla den bästa lagstiftningen för bolag att starta upp sin verksamhet i.</p><p>Vissa förespråkare anser att möjligheten till regelkonkurrens riskerar att försämra medlemsstaternas bolagsregler ur ett arbetstagarperspektiv då medlemsstaterna i framtiden kommer att utforma lagar som är förmånliga för bolagen men med ett sämre skydd för arbetstagare, ett såkallat <em>race to the bottom</em>. Andra menar att regelkonkurrens tvärt om stärker den inre europeiska marknaden då medlemsstaterna aktivt strävar efter att utforma de bästa lagarna ur allas perspektiv och att en sådan konkurrens behövs inom gemenskapen för att aktivt lyfta och utveckla kvalitén på medlemsstaternas bolagsregler, ett såkallat <em>race to the top.</em></p><p>Inom EU diskuteras idag förslag till ett gemensamt privat europeiskt aktiebolag (SPE-bolag) som ska gälla inom hela EU och där bolagsreglerna är desamma i alla medlemsstater. Gemensam harmonisering bland medlemsstaterna kan tänkas motverka en negativ utveckling av regelkonkurrensen (<em>race to the bottom</em> med försämrat arbetstagarskydd som följd) men kan även medföra att den goda utvecklingen som kan ske genom fri regelkonkurrens mellan nationella bolagsregler stannar upp bland medlemsstaterna. Vad gäller SPE-bolaget så motverkar inte det möjligheten för negativ regelkonkurrens mellan medlemsstaterna ur ett arbetstagarskyddsperspektiv utan snarare öppnar upp för mer negativ regelkonkurrens.</p><p>En möjlighet till god regelkonkurrens bland medlemsstaterna utan att konsekvenserna av att ett <em>race to the bottom</em> skulle uppstå är att den europeiske lagstiftaren utfärdar en gemensam arbetstagarskyddslagstiftning vilket alla medlemsstater måste följa. En sådan lagstiftning skulle reglera alla väsentliga arbetsrättsområden som skulle kunna förbises om en negativ regelkonkurrens skulle utvecklas mellan medlemsstaterna. Därefter skulle det råda en fri regelkonkurrens. En sådan lösning skulle ta de bra delarna ur regelkonkurrens samtidigt som de negativa delarna förhindrades.</p>

This mixed-methods replication study was conducted to develop further understanding of the professional perceptions of educational leaders as to the fairness and impact of Race to the Top reforms concerning teacher evaluation and compensation on student achievement and growth. Graduate students in education and educational leadership from a target university were selected to complete an electronic survey to collect quantitative and qualitative data for analysis. Quantitative results from the electronic survey revealed limited diversity in professional perceptions of the five identified components of RTTT based upon professional classification or percentage free and reduced lunch population at the school sites where assigned. Among the identified RTTT components, the component that provided for the use of school- or team-level VAM scores as part of the evaluation and compensation system was consistently viewed as the least fair and least impactful by respondents. Analysis of the qualitative data revealed a number of themes that effected respondents' professional perceptions of the RTTT initiative. The use of a value-added model in RTTT reforms, the variables considered by the model, and communication and implementation problems associated with the reforms were the central areas of concern among survey respondents. This study provided follow-up data to Windish's 2012 study and showed a negative general trajectory of the professional perceptions of educational leaders related to this high-profile, national educational reform effort.

abstract: Policymakers at the national level have recently initiated K-12 education reforms focused on teacher quality and teacher evaluation. Far-reaching legislation was subsequently enacted in the state of Arizona requiring schools to adopt standards-based teacher evaluation systems and link them to student outcomes. The end product is to result in annual summative measures of teacher effectiveness. Because of this, Arizona school administrators have become concerned about rapidly becoming experts in high-stakes teacher evaluation. Principals rarely have time to come together to talk about teacher evaluation, and consider the reliability of their evaluations and how to use teacher evaluation to help teachers improve their practice. This action research study focused on a group of nine administrators in a small urban district grappling with a more complex and high-stakes teacher evaluation system. An existing community of practice was engaged to help administrators become more effective, fair, and consistent evaluators. Activities were designed to engage the group in dynamic, contextualized learning. Participants interacted in small groups to interpret the meaning of newly adopted evaluation instruments and professional teaching standards, share practical knowledge, and compare teacher evaluation experiences in classrooms. Data were gathered with mixed methods. Prior to, and immediately after engaging in this 20-week innovation, principals and district administrators were given two surveys and interviewed about teacher evaluation. Additionally, a detailed record of this project was kept in the form of meeting records and a research journal. Quantitative and qualitative data were triangulated to validate findings. Results identified concerns and understandings of administrators as they attempted to come to a shared consensus regarding teacher evaluation, increase inter-rater reliability, and use teacher evaluation to improve professional practice. As a result of working and learning together administrators lowered their concerns about inter-rater reliability. Other concerns, however, remained and grew. Administrators found the process of gaining a common understanding of teacher evaluation to be complex and far more time-consuming than anticipated. Intense concerns about alignment of the evaluation system with other reforms led these administrators to consider modifications in their evaluation system. Implications from this study can be used to help other administrators grappling with common concerns. / Dissertation/Thesis / Ed.D. Educational Leadership and Policy Studies 2012

The issue of teacher accountability has been a part of the educational conversation for three decades, but only recently has this conversation been translated into policy as states begin directly tying teacher evaluation scores in part to student achievement on standardized tests. This qualitative study focuses on a group of teachers who are participating in this new form of evaluation (containing both qualitative and quantitative elements including test scores and lesson observations) and examines how they perceived the process. In particular, the study looks at how their personal reactions to a high-stakes evaluation impacted their instructional decision making in their literacy classrooms. Findings demonstrate that teachers had varying levels of change in instructional practice and that these changes were impacted by a variety of factors including personal beliefs and contextual issues. Additionally, findings demonstrated that participants found the qualitative portion of the model to be highly subjective which was considered especially problematic because of the high stakes nature of the evaluation.

High-stakes teacher evaluations (HSTEs) in public education influence millions of students and teachers across the U.S. Currently, there is a dearth of published quantitative research that shows the relation of HSTEs to teacher job satisfaction. The purpose of this quasiexperimental quantitative study was to determine if implementation of HSTEs in state of Hawaiʻi as part of the U.S. Department of Education's Race to the Top program initiative was related to teacher job satisfaction in public schools over time. A repeated measures analyses was conducted using archived teacher job satisfaction data from over 200 public schools in Hawaiʻi from 2009 to 2014, including data collected from 2 years before until 2 years after implementation of HSTEs. The theoretical framework used for the study was grounded in Herzberg's 2-factor theory of motivation. It was hypothesized that the implementation of HSTEs may have affected extrinsic hygiene factors such as wages, supervisory practices, and organizational policy relative to intrinsic motivational factors such as work achievement, recognition, and personal growth of teachers working in schools implementing the federal initiative. The most significant study finding was that both overall satisfaction and satisfaction with student achievement increased during the 2011-2012 implementation year and then fell below pre-implementation levels in the 2 years subsequent to implementation of HSTEs. This finding is discussed in the context of an increase in pay for public school teachers in Hawai'i during the post-implementation period. The results of this research may promote positive social change by highlighting the need for a focus on potential unintended consequences (i.e., possible negative effects on teacher job satisfaction) of federal education policies associated with HSTE systems.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between the changes in Tennessee Comprehensive Assessment Program (TCAP) scores and the changes in Per Pupil Expenditures (PPE) after the enactment of First to the Top Act of 2010 and the receipt of $501,000,000 in federal Race to the Top (RTTT) grant monies. Half of that money was retained by Tennessee Department of Education (TDOE) for education reform initiatives. The other half was awarded to each Local Education Agency (LEA) according to the Title I formula after TDOE approval of individual Scopes of Work. Reform initiatives included transition to Common Core State Standards, changes to standardized testing, teacher evaluation system reflecting teacher effect partly based on student achievement, changes to tenure, and establishment of an Achievement School District for low-performing schools. Fast-paced reforms and increasing accountability for student achievement and gap closure brought a climate of pressure and tension. Secondary data were readily available on the Tennessee Report Card from TDOE’s website (www.tn.gov/education). Data from each LEA were collected, organized, and analyzed in the areas of PPE; TCAP scores in math, reading/language arts, and science for 2010, 2011, and 2012; and student population. No significant relationships were found between the changes in PPE and the changes in TCAP scores. Significant differences were found between the math scores for Year 1 and Year 2. No significant differences were found between the reading/language arts scores for Year 1. A significant difference was found between the reading/language arts scores from 2010 to 2012. Significant differences were found for the science scores for both time periods; however, Year 1 science scores fell while 2010 to 2012 science scores rose. Mixed results were found when investigating the relationship between PPE and number of students. This study indicates the importance of careful discussions of how school funds are spent, perhaps even more than how much money is spent. Implications for further study might include qualitative investigations of the perceptions of stakeholders at all levels about the climate during the fast-paced reforms. Further study of data for Years 3 and 4 of the grant is also recommended.

No description available.