Spelling suggestions: "subject:"reforma das institui??es dde seguran?a"" "subject:"reforma das institui??es dde aseguran?a""
1 |
Seguran?a p?blica e democracia : uma hist?ria de desencontrosWinogron, Alberto Liebling Kopittke 19 January 2016 (has links)
Submitted by PPG Ci?ncias Criminais (ppgccrim@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-03T13:42:11Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTA??O ALBERTO KOPITTKE - Seguran?a P?blica e Democracia - 2016.pdf: 1430022 bytes, checksum: 363592e6ee3a1d3a05f8c706b120ca4b (MD5) / Rejected by Sheila Dias (sheila.dias@pucrs.br), reason: Devolvido devido ? falta dos anexos D, E e F, conforme consta no sum?rio do arquivo PDF. on 2018-05-14T18:08:57Z (GMT) / Submitted by PPG Ci?ncias Criminais (ppgccrim@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-15T12:50:37Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTA??O ALBERTO KOPITTKE - Seguran?a P?blica e Democracia - 2016.pdf: 1806809 bytes, checksum: d8ad36ae6d6ba172f5aa3804b46cafd6 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Sheila Dias (sheila.dias@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-22T11:24:07Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTA??O ALBERTO KOPITTKE - Seguran?a P?blica e Democracia - 2016.pdf: 1806809 bytes, checksum: d8ad36ae6d6ba172f5aa3804b46cafd6 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-22T11:36:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DISSERTA??O ALBERTO KOPITTKE - Seguran?a P?blica e Democracia - 2016.pdf: 1806809 bytes, checksum: d8ad36ae6d6ba172f5aa3804b46cafd6 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-01-19 / This dissertation discusses the consequences of the authoritarian tradition on the use of force, reinforced by the authoritarian regime that took place in Brazil between 1964 and 1988, on the current Public Security design in Brazil. The paper uses as a reference the transformation of the conception of Public Security held in the countries of consolidated democracy and the way the transition to democracy occurred in Brazil, taking into account the theoretical framework of the Transitional Justice. To analyze such consequences the paper gives an overview of actions taken at the federal level over the first three decades after democracy, from the role of the Armed Forces, the National Secretariat of Public Security and the National Human Rights Secretariat. To complement this assessment the paper also presents a survey of the level of transparency of state agencies of Public Safety, and discusses how transparency can be a transitional mechanism with potential to bring about changes on authoritarian traditions. The paper concludes that these traditions held great power and influence in decision-making processes in the Brazilian Public Security area along the first three post-democratization decades, keeping current militarized and bureaucratic vision with closed institutions without transparency, therefore preventing the area of public security to make the transition to a democratic conception. / O presente trabalho busca discutir as consequ?ncias da tradi??o autorit?ria sobre o uso da for?a, refor?adas pelo regime autorit?rio vivido no Brasil entre 1964 e 1988, na concep??o de Seguran?a P?blica vigente no Brasil. O trabalho utiliza como refer?ncia a transforma??o da concep??o de Seguran?a P?blica ocorrida nos pa?ses de democracia consolidada e a forma como ocorreu a transi??o para o regime democr?tico no Brasil, a partir dos referenciais te?ricos da Justi?a de Transi??o. Para analisar essas consequ?ncias o trabalho apresenta um balan?o das a??es realizadas em n?vel federal ao longo das tr?s primeiras d?cadas p?s- redemocratiza??o, a partir do papel das For?as Armadas, da Secretaria Nacional de Seguran?a P?blica e da Secretaria Nacional de Direitos Humanos. Para complementar essa avalia??o o trabalho ainda apresenta uma pesquisa sobre o n?vel de transpar?ncia dos ?rg?os estaduais de Seguran?a P?blica e como a transpar?ncia pode ser um mecanismo transicional com potencial para provocar mudan?as sobre tradi??es autorit?rias. O trabalho conclui que essas tradi??es mantiveram grande for?a e influ?ncia nos processos de tomada de decis?o na Seguran?a P?blica brasileira ao longo das tr?s primeiras d?cadas p?s- redemocratiza??o, mantendo vigente uma vis?o militarizada e burocr?tica, com institui??es fechadas e sem transpar?ncia, o que impedem a transi??o da ?rea para uma concep??o democr?tica.
|
Page generated in 0.2265 seconds