L’ostéopathie, depuis la loi du 4 mars 2002, n’est plus considérée comme un exercice illégal de la médecine. Néanmoins, le législateur a créé avec les décrets de 2007 un titre partagé entre des médecins et des non-médecins, sans créer une profession de santé. Sa nature controversée et son régime ambigu rendent l’ostéopathie en position inédite dans le paysage sanitaire français. Les textes définissent un titre, et non une profession ; les recommandations de l’organisation mondiale de la santé encouragent vers une reconnaissance d’une médecine complémentaire et l’Europe incite via ses directives à reconnaître une profession réglementée. En France, la règle est souvent née de la pratique et la réalité du terrain doit être confrontée à la règle. Sans oublier que le patient doit rester avant tout le moteur, l’axe principal ainsi que le repère qui doit animer les juristes, les professionnels et les législateurs. / Osteopathy is no longer considered as an illegal practice of medicine after the Act of the 4th of March 2002. However, following the 2007 decrees, the legislature created a shared title be-tween physicians and non-physician, without creating a health profession. Its controversial nature and its ambiguous regime have put the osteopathy in unique position in the French health landscape. The texts define a title, not a profession. The recommendations of the World Health Organization encourage the recognition of complementary medicine and Europe via its guidelines incites to recognize a pro-regulated profession. In France, the rule is often born of practice and the reality must be faced by the rule. Without forgetting the fact that the patient must remain primarily the engine, the main axis and the benchmark that should animate law-yers, professionals and legislators.

Cette thèse s'inscrit dans le cadre d'une convention CIFRE entre la Chambre Nationale des huissiers de justice et l'université Paris Dauphine. Afin de doter la profession d'huissier de justice d’arguments quantitatifs et qualitatifs pour mener à bien les différentes actions et anticiper les évolutions relatives à la profession, nous proposons dans ce projet de thèse d'analyser la démographie des offices d'huissier, leur localisation, leur structures, la sensibilité de l'activité de ces professionnels à la conjoncture. Ce projet s'engage également à évaluer l'équilibre économique des offices, au regard de règles de tarification complexes et enfin d'analyser la régulation du marché des services juridiques. / This thesis joins within the framework of a CIFRE agreement between the National Chamber of the bailiffs and the Paris Dauphine university. To endow the profession of bailiff of quantitative and qualitative arguments to bring to a successful conclusion the various actions and anticipate the evolutions relative to the profession, we suggest in this project of thesis analyzing the demography of bailiff's services, their localization, structure them, the sensibility of the activity of these professionals in the situation. This project also makes a commitment to estimate the balance in the economy of services, with regard to complex rules of pricing and finally to analyze the legal regulation of the services market.

The present master paper investigates the challenges which are met while trying to implement the provisions of the directives on professional qualifications into national law. Despite the fact that the directives regulating the recognition of professional qualifications have already been implemented into the national law of the Republic of Lithuania after the new European Parliament and Council directive 2005/36/EC codifying all the existed directives on the recognition of professional qualifications, has been adopted, the competent authorities face new challenges trying to implement the provisions of new directives. Due to this fact, several stages of the implementation of the directives of European Union are distinguished.: the obligations Lithuania had to fulfil before the accession to EU and after the new Directive 2005/36/EC was adopted. The main objective of this paper is to analyse problematical issues regarding the transposition of directives on recognition of regulated professional qualifications into national law. The attempt was made to disclose the main features of the systems regarding recognition of regulated professional qualifications. A great deal of attention is alloted to the analysis of the process of recognition, the presumptions and the development of General system of recognition and Sectoral directives. The main legal documents on professional qualifications as well as provisions of the new law are widely discussed. Currently more and more emphasis... [to full text]