Der Inselstaat Fidschi im Südpazifik hat ein ausgeprägtes Landwirtschaftliches Wissenssystem mit einer Reihe privater und staatlicher Institutionen. Im Mittelpunkt der Untersuchung standen die staatlichen Agrarforschungs- und Beratungsabteilungen des Landwirtschaftsministeriums. Mit einem partizipativen Aktionsforschungsansatz wurde untersucht, welchen Beitrag partizipative Methoden zur Verbesserung des Informationsflusses zwischen Bauern und dem Ministerium leisten können, um damit eine systematische Integration der Probleme der Bauern im Wissenssystem zu erreichen. Weiterhin wurde erhoben, welchen Beitrag Plattformen für eine effizientere Arbeit im Ministerium leisten können. Partizipative Methoden (PRA) erwiesen sich als sehr geeignet den Dialog mit den Bauern zu fördern und deren Probleme zu analysieren. Neben den Problemen konnten auch die Potenziale der Betriebe und bäuerliche Lösungsvorschläge gut erfasst werden. Als Ergebnis wurde eine Modell zur systematischen Problemerfassung und Bestimmung von Forschungs- und Beratungsprioritäten erarbeitet. Der Trainingskurs in partizipativen Methoden zeigte folgende Stärken der lokalen Mitarbeiter auf: Organisieren von Untersuchungen, Anwendung partizipativer Methoden im Feld, praktische Implementierung, Visualisierung und Präsentation von Untersuchungsergebnissen. Schwachpunkte wurden hingegen in folgenden Bereichen festgestellt: konzeptionelles Denken, Interpretation und Auswertung der Daten sowie der schriftlichen Abfassung von Ergebnissen. Diese Defizite im konzeptionellen Bereich schränken das mit den Methoden erreichbare Problemlösungspotenzial ein. Weiterbildung der Mitarbeiter und eine Verbesserung der lokalen Agrarausbildung werden benötigt, um das Niveau der wissenschaftlichen Ausbildung anzuheben. Die Untersuchung von vier Projekten zeigte, dass diese als Plattformen gut zur Innovationsentwicklung und eingeschränkt zu deren Verbreitung geeignet waren. Eine ausgewogene Beteiligung aller Akteure zeichnete die erfolgreichste Plattform aus. Als Stärken des Plattformmodells konnten festgehalten werden: bessere Koordination, verbesserte Verbindungen und Schnittstellen, bessere Zusammenarbeit aller Akteure, bessere Aussichten gesetzte Ziele zu erreichen, Vermeidung von Doppelforschung und eine effiziente Ausnutzung der vorhandenen Ressourcen. Schwächen des Modells wurden in folgenden Punkten gesehen: Konsenserzielung, institutionelle Akzeptanz und Mangel an entsprechend ausgebildeten Fachkräften im Ministerium. Drei Jahre nach Beginn der Trainingsmaßnahmen konnte eine teilweise Institutionalisierung von partizipativen Methoden im Ministerium festgestellt werden. Zur weiteren Konsolidierung partizipativer Methoden und Plattformen wird eine Linkage-Abteilung empfohlen. / The small Island country Fiji has an articulated agricultural knowledge system with private and public institutions. The agricultural research and extension departments of the Ministry of Agriculture are the focus of this study. A participatory action research methodology was used to investigate the potential of participatory methods and to improve information flows between farmers and the Ministry in order to achieve a systematic Integration of farmers' problems into the knowledge system. Furthermore, the potential of platforms in improvement of the efficiency of work in the Ministry was studied. Participatory methods proved suitable in improving the dialog with farmers and the analysis of their problems. Besides this, farmers potentials and their ideas for solutions could be assessed. As a result, a model for the systematic compilation of farmers' problems and respective research and extension priorities could be elaborated. The training course on participatory methods revealed the following strength of Ministry staff: organising surveys, field use of tools, presentation and visualisation of findings. Conceptual thinking, analytical skills, interpretation, and report writing skills were identified as weaknesses. These deficits restrict the problem solving potential of participatory methods in the Ministry. Further education of Ministry staff and revised curricula at the local agricultural colleges will be required, to raise the overall level of scientific education. Four projects that were studied as cases for platforms, revealed that platforms were suitable means for promoting innovation development and somewhat less successful for the diffusion of findings. The most successful platform was characterised by a balanced contribution and participation of all actors involved. Strengths of the platform model were identified as such: better co-ordination, improved linkages, better interplay of actors, better means to reach goals, reduced duplication of efforts, and better use of resources. Weaknesses were seen in the need to achieve consensus and co-ordination, the weakening of hierarchical authority due to increased flexibility, and the fact that experienced-trained staff were not available in abundance in the Ministry. Three years after the first introduction of participatory methods in the Ministry, a partial institutionalisation could be observed. For the further consolidation of participatory methods and platforms, a linkage unit for further promotion is recommended.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-02T21:42:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 GlauberSantos.pdf: 1453267 bytes, checksum: 59d96c344bdb075a9fd1720450959a22 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-07-25 / This work aims to analyze the overall institutionalization of university extension, with a focus on private higher education institutions in the city of Guarujá (SP). The research is justified by the importance that the extension made in the context of education in Brazil, considering that the tripod of teaching consists of Research, Education and Extension. The guiding question is: How does the institutionalization of university extension projects has been given in the IES Guarujá SP. Specific objectives were defined: a) Identify political ideas as well as the practical extension declared by IES b) Analyse the vision of the manager in the administration of extension with respect to its institutionalization. The methodological approach to be developed will be the qualitative research, exploratory, using the methodology of multiple case studies. The documentary research and semi-structured interviews are part of the data collection that will subsidize the final analysis. Assumptions as field research that will have a cross-analysis of data: 1) The implementation of extension projects is carried out only for bureaucratic and political comply with legal requirements and 2) the institutionalization of extension projects is done only with slow lawful purposes and / or politicians to meet a portion of the population in the vicinity of the institution, but without legitimate social purposes regarding the essence of the values of university extension. The results of the field research, the assumptions have been confirmed in the IES study as well as the absence of the inseparability. / O presente trabalho possui como objetivo geral a análise da institucionalização da extensão universitária, tendo como foco as instituições de ensino superior (IES) particulares do município de Guarujá (SP). A pesquisa se justifica pela importância que a extensão tomou no contexto da educação no Brasil, tendo em vista a indissociabilidade entre Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensão. A pergunta norteadora é: De que forma a institucionalização dos projetos de extensão universitária vem sendo administrada nas IES do município de Guarujá (SP)? Como objetivos específicos foram delimitados: a) Identificar as concepções políticas, assim como as práticas extensionistas declaradas pelas IES e b) Analisar a visão do gestor na administração da extensão no que tange a sua institucionalização. A abordagem metodológica foi de cunho qualitativo, exploratório, por meio de estudos de casos múltiplos. Os instrumentos de coleta de dados foram documentos e entrevistas semiestruturadas. Os principais resultados encontrados foram: 1) A execução dos projetos de extensão é realizada de forma burocrática somente para cumprir requisitos legais e políticos; e 2) A institucionalização dos projetos de extensão é feita de forma lenta somente com objetivos legais e/ou políticos para atender uma parcela da população no entorno da instituição, porém sem fins sociais legítimos no que tange à essência dos valores de extensão universitária. Constatou-se, portanto, a ausência da indissociabilidade entre ensino, pesquisa e extensão

Submitted by Geandra Rodrigues (geandrar@gmail.com) on 2018-10-24T13:21:58Z No. of bitstreams: 1 andreydasilvabrugger.pdf: 2828426 bytes, checksum: 40c60333fec12f724bfded7bb90bf6df (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2018-11-23T12:21:10Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 andreydasilvabrugger.pdf: 2828426 bytes, checksum: 40c60333fec12f724bfded7bb90bf6df (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-11-23T12:21:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 andreydasilvabrugger.pdf: 2828426 bytes, checksum: 40c60333fec12f724bfded7bb90bf6df (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-08-22 / CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / O presente trabalho é fruto de pesquisa de dissertação de mestrado que teve como pano de fundo o fortalecimento da participação e do controle social na gestão do sistema único de saúde. O desenvolvimento da pesquisa está calcado no estudo de caso do Projeto Polo Institucional de Fortalecimento da Gestão Participativa do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), o PoloSUS. O PoloSUS é fruto de uma pareceria entre a Secretaria de Gestão Estratégica e Participativa do Ministério da Saúde (SGEP-MS) e a Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), através da Escola de Governo e Cidadania (EGC), com base na Política Nacional de Gestão Estratégica e Participativa do SUS (ParticipaSUS), tendo como principal objetivo a promoção do fortalecimento das políticas de gestão participativa no âmbito do SUS através da geração de conhecimentos e capacitação dos gestores públicos e lideranças sociais, congregando elementos de extensão, pesquisa e inovação tecnológica social. A parceria abrangeu 280 municípios subdivididos em 17 municípios-polo. A dissertação possui o objetivo de avaliar a eficácia de parcerias entre o Ministério da Saúde e entidades como as Universidades e ONG´s para a execução de políticas públicas, perquerindo quais os incentivos e obstáculos na realização dessas parcerias. A hipótese inicial é que o Governo busca essas parcerias para ter maior capilaridade no território e/ou por não ter toda a expertise requerida em seus quadros para a execução da política. Busca-se, ainda, avaliar se a entidade parceira, no presente estudo de caso, a UFJF, também possuía condições de executar os objetivos delineados no termo de convênio. Dessa maneira, almeja-se saber o que foi o PoloSUS, como funcionou – com suas conquistas e fracassos – e os eventuais efeitos gerados pelo projeto, através de entrevistas e utilização do estudo de caso fundado nas fases/ciclos de análise de políticas públicas. / The present workis the result of a dissertation research that had as background the strengthening of participation and social control in the management of the SUS. The research development is based on the case study of the Pole Institutional Project to Strengthen Participative Management of the Unified Health System (SUS), PoloSUS. PoloSUS is the result of a partnership between the Department of Strategic and Participatory Management of the Ministry of Health (SGEP-MS) and the Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), through the School of Government and Citizenship (EGC), based on the National Policy on Strategic and Participatory Management of SUS (ParticipaSUS), with the main objective of promoting the strengthening of participatorymanagement policies within SUS, through the generation of knowledge and training of public managers and social leaders, gathering elements of extension, research and social technological innovation. The partnership covered 280 municipalities subdivided into 17 polo municipalities. The purpose of this dissertation is to evaluate the effectiveness of partnerships between the Ministry of Health and entities such as universities and NGOs for the implementation of public policies, and to identify the incentivesand obstacles in the implementation of these partnerships. The initial hypothesis is that the Government seeks these partnerships to have greater capillarity in the territory and / or to not have all the expertise required in its staff to carry out the policy. It is also sought to evaluate if the partner entity, in the present case study, the UFJF, also had the conditions to execute the objectives delineated in the term of agreement. In this way, it is desired to know what was the PoloSUS, how it worked -with its achievements and failures -and the possible effects generated by the project, through interviews and use of the case study based on the phases / cycles of public policy analysis.