This research investigates flood-risk communication challenges in Canada, emphasizing the need for tailored strategies to address diverse household preferences and values. In Chapter 2, we examine Canadian household experiences with flood-risk information, aiming to identify new communication needs and bridge the gap between households and flood-risk managers. The interviews reveal previously overlooked flood risk information needs. The importance of tailored communication strategies was highlighted by household participants as they emphasized the need for information that caters to their unique circumstances and requirements. Moreover, fairness emerged as a crucial aspect of flood-risk communication, prompting a call for equitable practices to address vulnerabilities affecting specific households. In Chapter 3, we investigate household values and preferences on flood-risk information through a survey of at-risk households in Canada, uncovering diverse preferences, values and needs for tailored risk information. Additionally, significant differences in flood-risk knowledge, accessibility, and transparency are observed among risk-status groups, with higher awareness among those who perceive themselves at risk. Overall, this research emphasizes the importance of understanding diverse values and preferences within households regarding flood-risk information. Strengthening flood-risk communication strategies and addressing information gaps can lead to more informed risk perceptions and improve awareness among at-risk households in Canada / Thesis / Master of Arts (MA) / This research focuses on how people in Canada receive information about flood risks and how we can improve it. In Chapter 2, we talked to Canadian households to learn about their experiences with flood-risk information. We found that the current way of giving this information might not meet everyone's needs. People want information that fits their specific situations, and they stressed the importance of fairness in how the information is shared. In Chapter 3, we conducted a survey among households at risk of flooding in Canada to find out what kind of information they prefer. We discovered that people like to get clear and direct messages with detailed risk information that is customized for them. We also noticed that some people who think they are at higher risk of flooding are more informed about the risks. This means it's essential to consider how people see their own risk levels when communicating with them effectively. Overall, this research shows that flood-risk information needs to be tailored to people's different preferences and values. By doing this, we can help individuals and communities better understand and prepare for flood risks. We recommend working together with different groups involved in flood-risk management to improve how we communicate these risks. By doing so, we can create a more informed and inclusive flood-risk communication system that helps communities stay safe during flood events in the future.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

This dissertation focuses on occupational risk communication created by grantees of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration\'s Susan Harwood Training Grant (SHTG) Program. Although the SHTG program is aimed at workers in most high-hazard industries, I focus on occupational risk communication developed for residential construction workers, who remain the most at-risk for on-the-job injuries and fatalities. In 2011 (the most recent year for which statistics are available), 721 construction workers died in work-related accidents (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2012). In this study, I relied primarily on two research methods: context-sensitive text analysis of deliverables created by twelve SHTG program grantees from 2006-2009 and interviews with representatives of four of these twelve grantees. The findings from this research illustrate the complexity of creating occupational risk communication in grant-related institutional settings. Although the process might seem straightforward, it is composed of twelve milestones, each of which can result in difficulties for the final deliverables. Grantees are asked to create safety training deliverables that includes principles of active workplace learning; however, qualitative analysis of these deliverables indicates that such principles are rarely enacted. Instead, the deliverables are marked by an emphasis on technical language, as well as by death-focused justification strategies that scare trainees into following the guidelines being presented. Each of these characteristics can alienate audiences of varied linguistic and cultural backgrounds, such as those found in the construction industry. / Ph. D.

Within risk communication, much is understood about pre-event warning related to evacuation and sheltering; however risk communication during the return-entry phase when ending evacuations has been largely under-studied in the disaster literature. Understanding of the return-entry risk communication process is important because returning early or prior to issuance of the all-clear message can make returnees susceptible to post-disaster risks, and also hamper post-disaster activities such as debris removal, traffic management, utility restoration and damage assessments. Guided by the Warning Components Framework and the Theory of Motivated Information Management, this dissertation focuses on risk communication as it pertains to organizational behavior during the return-entry process by examining how local emergency management organizations develop, disseminate and monitor return-entry messages. The data is collected through semi-structured telephone interviews with local emergency management organizations that managed return-entry following Hurricane Sandy. The findings of the study indicate that local emergency management organizations required information on post-disaster threats, damages, and utility and infrastructure condition in order to develop return-entry strategy for their community. Organizations improvised to their existing risk communication measures by adopting creative ways for information dissemination to the evacuees. They also utilized active and passive approach to monitor public response to the return-entry messages.

CHDS State/Local / Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited / There are many potential targets for terrorists in the United States, one of which is the food supply system. An attack on the food supply system would create great need for information to many audiences, primarily the general public, about the risk resulting from such an attack. The Multi-State Partnership for Security in Agriculture, a collaborative effort of 10 states, has identified the need for development of a strategy for communicating to the public the risk resulting from an agroterrorism incident. Before the Partnership begins development of a strategy, however, it must take into consideration the factors that are important when communicating about agroterrorism risk: recognition that communication of risk about food carries with it specific challenges; the public's level of trust in government will affect how it perceives and accepts risk messages; and Americans' post-September 11, 2001 fear associated with terrorism alters perception and acceptance of risk. Recognition of the existence of these factors is not enough, however. The Partnership must recognize, as well, that these factors may present barriers to effective communication. To overcome these barriers, the Partnership should apply tried-and-true risk communication principles, tailored to specifically address the factors that make agroterrorism risk communication unique. / Civilian, Public Affairs Manager, Iowa Homeland Security and Emergency Management Division

Hensikt: Hensikten med studien er å fordype kunnskapen om hvordan gravide kvinner opplever en tidlig ultralydundersøkelse med risikovurdering for kromosomavvik, og hvordan de resonnerer omkring resultatet. Nytteverdien blir å løfte frem denne kunnskapen, og ta den med i den videre debatten omkring dette tema. Metode: Det ble gjort en kvalitativ intervjuundersøkelse med ti gravide kvinner som skulle få utført en risikovurdering for kromosomavvik. Kvinnene ble intervjuet både før og etter undersøkelsen. Grounded theory ble benyttet som analysemetode. Resultater: I studien ble det ble generert en kjernekategori; Jeg vil ha valget, men ikke ta det, og fem hovedkategorier: Eksistensielle valg, Trygghetsfølelse, Engstelse, Skyldfølelse og Veiledning / Ivaretakelse. Kjernekategorien beskriver kvinnenes konflikt mellom å ville ha muligheten til denne undersøkelsen, og samtidig ha vanskeligheter med å ta de påfølgende valgene. Noen av faktorene som gjorde valgene så vanskelige var engstelse, tap av kontroll / mestring, tilknytning til fosteret, skyldfølelse og sosialt press. Siden kvinnene ønsket selvstendige valg uten påvirkning fra andre, følte de også en større ansvarlighet for de valg som ble tatt. Forståelsen av den kalkulerte risikoen varierte mellom kvinnene, og de benyttet ulike metoder for å lette vurderingen og valget. Gravide kvinner har et stort informasjonsbehov når det gjelder prenatal diagnostikk, og de ønsker en lett tilgjengelighet til spesialisthelsetjenesten. For å få tid til refleksjon over egne verdier og holdninger, er det viktig at informasjonen blir gitt på et så tidlig tidspunkt i svangerskapet som mulig. Konklusjon: Studien viser kompleksiteten av følelser som gravide kvinner kan oppleve i forbindelse med en tidlig ultralydundersøkelse og risikovurdering for kromosomavvik. Disse stressrelaterte følelsene kan sammen med beslutninger på komplisert risikoinformasjon, og på et sterkt ansvarlig og moralsk område vanskeliggjøre beslutningsprosessen. En bedre informasjonsformidling og kontakt med helsevesenet er nødvendig for at kvinnene skal ta informerte valg, som er i tråd med deres verdier og holdninger. / Purpose: This qualitative study aimed to increase understanding of how pregnant women experience early ultrasound examination that includes risk assessment for chromosomal anomalies. Moreover, this study examined how such women rationalize test results. Method: I conducted pre- and post-examination interviews of ten pregnant women undergoing risk assessment for chromosomal anomolies, and used grounded theory to analyze the results. Results: The study generated a core category (I want a choice, but I don’t want to decide) and five main categories (existential choices, feeling of safety, anxiety, guilt, and counselling and care). Factors contributing to choice difficulty included anxiety, loss of control or coping, emotional connection to the fetus, feelings of guilt, and social pressures. The core category describes the conflict between choice and decision. Since the women sought independent choices without external influence, they also felt greater responsibility. The women’s understanding of actual risk varied, and they used different logic and methods to evaluate risk and reach a decision. Conclusion: Pregnant women need for prenatal diagnostic information and want easy access to specialty services. This study shows the complex feelings pregnant women experience regarding early ultrasound examination that includes risk assessment for chromosomal defects. Stress, non-transparent information about actual and perceived risks, and personal moral judgments further complicate the decision-making process. Therefore, improved distribution of information and frequent contact with health professionals will help women to make informed choices in accordance with their values and beliefs. / <p>ISBN 978-91-5-85721-47-4</p>

This doctoral thesis analyses the concept of risk and how it functions as an organizing principle of discourse, paying close attention to actual linguistic practice.           Article 1 analyses the concepts of risk, safety and security and their relations based on corpus data (the Corpus of Contemporary American English). Lexical, grammatical and semantic contexts of the nouns risk, safety and security, and the adjectives risky, safe and secure are analysed and compared. Similarities and differences are observed, suggesting partial synonymy between safety (safe) and security (secure) and semantic opposition to risk (risky). The findings both support and contrast theoretical assumptions about these concepts in the literature.           Article 2 analyses the concepts of risk and danger and their relation based on corpus data (in this case the British National Corpus). Frame semantics is used to explore the assumptions of the sociologist Niklas Luhmann (and others) that the risk concept presupposes decision-making, while the concept of danger does not. Findings partly support and partly contradict this assumption.           Article 3 analyses how newspapers represent risk and causality. Two theories are used: media framing and the philosopher John Mackie’s account of causality. A central finding of the study is that risks are “framed” with respect to causality in several ways (e.g. one and the same type of risk can be presented as resulting from various causes). Furthermore, newspaper reporting on risk and causality vary in complexity. In some articles, risks are presented without causal explanations, while in other articles, risks are presented as results from complex causal conditions. Considering newspaper reporting on an aggregated overall level, complex schemas of causal explanations emerge.           Article 4 analyses how phenomena referred to by the term nano (e.g. nanotechnology, nanoparticles and nanorobots) are represented as risks in Swedish newspaper reporting. Theoretically, the relational theory of risk and frame semantics are used. Five main groups of nano-risks are identified based on the risk object of the article: (I) nanotechnology; (II) nanotechnology and its artefacts (e.g. nanoparticles and nanomaterials); (III) nanoparticles, without referring to nanotechnology; (IV) non-nanotechnological nanoparticles (e.g. arising from traffic); and (V) nanotechnology and nanorobots. Various patterns are explored within each group, concerning, for example, what is considered to be at stake in relation to these risk objects, and under what conditions. It is concluded that Swedish patterns of newspaper reporting on nano-risks follow international trends, influenced by scientific assessment, as well as science fiction.           Article 5 analyses the construction and negotiation of risk in the Swedish controversy over the use of antibacterial silver in health care and consumer products (e.g. sports clothes and equipment). The controversy involves several actors: print and television news media, Government and parliament, governmental agencies, municipalities, non-government organisations, and companies. In the controversy, antibacterial silver is claimed to be a risk object that negatively affects health, the environment, and sewage treatment industry (objects at risk). In contrast, such claims are denied. Antibacterial silver is even associated with the benefit of mitigating risk objects (e.g. bacteria and micro-organisms) that threaten health and the environment (objects at risk). In other words, both sides of the controversy invoke health and the environment as objects at risk. Three strategies organising risk communication are identified: (i) representation of silver as a risk to health and the environment; (ii) denial of such representations; and (iii) benefit association, where silver is construed to mitigate risks to health and the environment. / Avhandlingen analyserar begreppet risk och hur detta begrepp strukturerar diskurs. Ett centralt intresse för analysen är faktisk språkanvändning.           I den första artikeln analyseras de engelska begreppen risk, safety and security och deras relation. Analysen bygger på korpusdata (the Corpus of Contemporary American English). Lexikala och grammatiska kontexter för substantiven risk, safety och security och adjektiven risky, safe och secure analyseras och jämförs. Både likheter och skillnader identifieras vilka i stort bekräftar att safety (safe) och security (secure) är synonymer och i sin tur motsatser (antonymer) till risk (risky). Studien stödjer flera tidigare antaganden om dessa begrepp inom forskningslitteraturen, men motsäger andra.           I den andra artikeln analyseras de engelska begreppen risk och danger och deras relation baserat på korpusdata (the British National Corpus). Ramsemantik (eng. frame semantics) används för att undersöka antagandet att begreppet risk förutsätter beslutsfattande, medan begreppet danger inte gör det. Studien stödjer delvis detta antagande, men visar också på problem med antagandet.           I den tredje artikeln analyseras hur nyhetspress framställer risk och orsak-verkansamband (kausalitet). Två teorier används. För det första används teorin om medias ”inramning” av händelser (eng. media framing). För det andra används filosofiska perspektiv på kausala beskrivningar. En huvudsaklig slutsats är att risker framställs på många olika sätt med avseende på kausalitet. Exempelvis kan en och samma risk framställas som ett resultat av flera olika orsaker. Vidare framställer nyhetspress riskers kausalitet med olika grader av komplexitet. I vissa tidningsartiklar presenteras risker utan några kausala förklaringar. I andra tidningsartiklar presenteras risker som resultat av komplexa orsak-verkansamband. Om man betraktar nyhetsrapporteringen om risker på en övergripande nivå, så framträder en komplex bild av riskers orsakssamband.           I den fjärde artikeln analyseras framställningar av fenomen som benämns med morfemet nano, exempelvis nanoteknologi, nanomaterial och nanorobotar. Frågan som besvaras är på vilket sätt sådana fenomen framställs som risker i svensk nyhetspress. Teoretiskt utgår studien från den relationella teorin om risk och ramsemantik. Baserat på vilka fenomen som framställs som riskobjekt (eller hot) i tidningsartiklar, identifieras fem grupper av nanorisker: (I) nanoteknologi, (II) nanoteknologi och dess produkter (t.ex. nanopartiklar och nanomaterial), (III) nanopartiklar (utan referens till nanoteknologi), (IV) nanopartiklar som inte är resultat av nanoteknologi (utan istället uppstår t.ex. i trafiken) och (V) nanoteknologi och nanorobotar. För varje grupp undersöks vidare mönster i framställningen av dessa risker, exempelvis, vad som beskrivs som hotat av dessa riskobjekt och under vilka förutsättningar. Studiens empiriska observationer stödjer tidigare forskning om hur nanorisker rapporteras i nyhetspress internationalt. Rapporteringen av nanorisker är influerad av vetenskapliga riskbedömningar, men också av science fiction.           I den femte artikeln analyseras en kontrovers kring användningen av antibakteriellt silver inom sjukvården och i konsumentartiklar som exempelvis träningskläder och sportutrustning. Fokus för artikeln är hur risker uppfattas i den svenska debatten som inbegriper nyhetsmedia (press och TV), regering och riksdag, myndigheter, kommuner, intresseorganisationer och företag. Vissa aktörer menar att silver är ett riskobjekt som påverkar olika värden på ett negativt sätt, till exempel, folkhälsan, miljön, och avloppsreningsindustrin. Andra aktörer förnekar dessa påståenden. De menar till och med att silver har fördelar som att motverka risker som hotar folkhälsan och miljön. Med andra ord åberopar båda sidorna av kontroversen hälsa och miljö som värden viktiga att skydda. Slutligen identifieras tre strategier för riskkommunikation som tillämpas i kontroversen: (i) framställningen av silver som en miljö- och hälsorisk, (ii) förnekande av dessa påståenden, och (iii) nyttoassociationer där silver framställs som något som motverkar miljö- och hälsorisker. / <p>QC 20160127</p>

Purpose of this thesis is to study the impact of wind turbines on their surroundings. It also aims to analyze how the communication looks between the authorities, the planner and local residents prior to the establishment of wind turbines in Lännäs/Odensbacken in Örebro, where three wind turbines set up in a group. The results of this survey show that the participants experience themselves not as especially disturbed of the turbines in the form of large noise, shadows, and sleep disturbance indoors and outdoors. Participants felt that no change had taken place on the natural environment (52%) since the turbines became operational. It was 49% of participants had got no information about the establishment of Örebro Municipality, Örebro County Administrative Board or Wind Power Company. Scientists/­experts had the highest confidence of 86%, politicians and the media/journalists had least confidence. In the case of knowledge that people have about wind power's impact in their environment, the responses were "quite positive" under the effect of cleaner air (81%), on Odensbacken (79%), on housing value (44%), on outdoor recreation (38%) and on the property value (38%). According to this study, the three plants were well located, the works do not entail any major interventions in the landscape, impact and disruption on the local environment was limited and the area can be assessed as a rugged landscape of new elements. Local people in the area need more knowledge about impact of wind turbines on humans, plants, birds, animals and landscapes. The communication described in our case less participant friendly because there is no transparency. Confidence in the wind as renewable energy, for government agencies or for wind developer can damage players and officials do not choose the right methods for good communication. A lack of communication can thus increase the resistance and can even stop the wind developments in the region in the future. / Uppsatsens syfte är att studera vindkraftverkens påverkan på sin omgivning. Syftet är även att analysera hur kommunikationen ser ut mellan myndigheter, projektören samt närboende före etableringen av vindkraftverken i Lännäs/Odensbacken, i Örebro kommun, där tre vindkraftverk etablerats i en grupp. Resultaten av denna undersökning visade att deltagarna upplevde sig inte som speciellt störda av verken i form av stora bullerstörningar, skuggor, eller sömnstörningar inomhus respektive utomhus. Deltagarna tyckte att ingen förändring hade skett på naturmiljön (52%) sedan vindkraftverken togs i drift. Det var 49%  av deltagarna fick ingen information om etableringen av Örebro kommun eller från vindkrafts­bolaget. Forskare/experter hade det högsta förtroendet att ge information 86%, politiker och media/journalister hade lägst förtroende 29%. När det gäller kunskap som befolkningen hade om vindkraftens påverkan på sin omgivning svaren var ”ganska positivt” vid påverkan på renare luft (81%), påverkan på Odensbacken (79%), på boendemiljön (44%), på friluftsliv (38%) och på fastighetsvärde (38%). Enligt denna undersökning var de tre verken väl placerade, verken medför inte några stora ingrepp i landskapet, påverkan och störningar på närmiljön hade begränsats och området kan bedömas som ett tåligt landskap för nya inslag. Lokalbefolkningen i området behöver mer kunskap om vindkraft­verkens påverkan på människor, på växter, fåglar, djur och på landskap. Kommunikationen beskrivs i vårt fall som mindre deltagarvänlig eftersom det saknas öppenhet. Förtroendet för vindkraftverk som förnyelsebar energi, för myndigheter eller för vindkraftsbolaget kan skadas om aktörerna och tjänstemän inte väljer rätt metoder för en god kommunikation. En bristfällig kommunikation kan därmed öka motstånd och kan även stoppa vindkrafts­utvecklingen i området i fram tiden.