Spelling suggestions: "subject:"river diversification"" "subject:"liver diversification""
1 |
Hydraulic model investigation of sediment control measures at low weir river diversion worksDu Plessis, Lodewicus Johannes 03 1900 (has links)
Thesis (MSc)--Stellenbosch University, 2015. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Rivers are one of the earth's major readily available sources of fresh water. Abstractions from
rivers are however not without problems. Firstly, river
ow is variable and to deliver a constant
yield is difficult. Secondly, rivers transport sediment which will be included in the diverted
ow.
Sediment control at diversion works have been studied for many years and this study attempts
to gain further knowledge on certain sediment control features of diversion works.
Sediment control at diversion works and abstraction works is crucial to prolong the life of the
mechanical components like pumps and turbines. A Commonly used diversion works design
is one with a low weir and a graveltrap. The weir dams water for abstraction, which is of
importance in South Africa with its variable rainfall and river
ow.
The study focused on the following design features of diversion works: (1) the intake angle, which
is the angle at which the structure is pushed into the river, (2) the intake opening height above
a datum, (3) the river
ow range where sediment is sufficiently scoured from the graveltrap
and (4) the efficiency and river
ow range of sediment
ushing through a sluice gate at the
graveltrap.
A Physical model study was conducted in the laboratory of the University of Stellenbosch, which
consisted of designing the diversion works that were to be tested. The designs were based on
guidelines from previous studies, case studies and hydraulic principles. The above mentioned
features (1-4) were studied at three structures with prototype weir sizes of 2.5 m, 3.5 m and 4.5
m. The river was modelled as a straight rectangular channel with a loose bed surface, which
was simulated with crushed peach pips. Sediment was also fed into the system with a conveyor
belt feed system.
Pumps were used to abstract water and sediment through the intake opening, during the diverted
sediment tests. Flow was diverted at a specific
ow rate for each structure. The diverted sediment was caught and weighed. Each structure was designed to divert sediment through one
of three intake opening heights, to determine whether a higher intake opening sufficiently reduces
the amount of diverted sediment. The self-scour efficiency at the graveltrap was determined with
a sediment level survey in the graveltrap. From the survey a clearance
ow was determined,
which is the minimum river
ow that clears the intake opening of sediment along its complete
length. It was also determined what intake angle induces secondary
ow which results in the
lowest clearance
ow. The sediment
ushing through the sluice gate was evaluated by recording
the time it takes a full graveltrap to be
ushed clean at various river
ow rates. The maximum
river
ow at which the graveltrap still
ushes efficiently was determined for each structure.
It was found that between the 300, 450 and 600 intake angle that were tested, the 60 0 angle
yields the lowest diverted sediment ratio (DSR) over the range of structures as well as river
ows tested. The tests yielded a river
ow at each structure where the DSR is at minimum.
During the self-scour tests of the graveltrap, it was determined that a 450 intake angle promotes
better self-scour at the graveltrap. To promote both features, a 450 intake angle is suggested,
as it reduces diverted sediment and has a lower risk of issues due to too large
ow constriction.
The intake opening height was evaluated with analysis of diverted load and concentration. The
conclusions on the intake opening vary between structure sizes. In the case of the smallest
structure, with a 2.5 m weir height, the improvement observed for intake openings higher than
the first (lowest) were variable. In the case of the 3.5 m weir structure, the results showed
three consecutive intake openings could be feasible. In the case of the 4.5 m weir structure, less
improvement was observed between the highest two intakes. Flood frequency should determine
whether an intake opening with top-of-inlet of 1.6 m or 3.3 m above the minimum operating
level should be designed.
It was observed during the sediment
ushing tests that submergence of either the graveltrap
wall and/or the downstream water level affects the
ushing efficiency. y3/y2, which is the
downstream
ow depth over the contracted
ow depth under the sluice gate of the graveltrap,
was evaluated as an indicator of efficient
ushing. The study found that a good guideline would
be to
ush during river
ows where y3/y2 < 1, while also ensuring the
ow over the graveltrap
wall entrains the sediment in the graveltrap.
A figure which plots the downstream
ow depth over sluice gate opening size was developed
to serve as an operational guideline to efficient sediment
ushing. The figure shows zones of
efficient and non-efficient
ushing. Further, the observed sediment
ushing and self-scour ranges
at each structure are also represented graphically.
The fact that there was designed for a specific river scenario and also the lack of varied model
sediment size, limits the applicability of the findings and conclusions. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Riviere is van die aarde se hoof, maklik beskikbare bronne van vars water. Onttrekking uit
riviere is wel nie sonder probleme nie. Eerstens is rivier vloei wisselvallig en om 'n konstante
lewering te handhaaf is moeilik. Tweedens, vervoer riviere sediment wat ingesluit sal wees in die
uitgekeerde vloei. Sediment beheer by uitkeerwerke word al vir baie jare bestudeer en hierdie
studie poog om verdere kennis te verkry oor sekere sediment beheer funksies van uitkeerwerke.
Sediment beheer by uitkeerwerke en onttrekkingswerke is noodsaaklik om die lewensduur van
meganiese komponente soos pompe en turbines te verleng. 'n Algemeen toegepaste uitkeerwerke
ontwerp is een met n lae keerwal en gruisvangkanaal. Die keerwal dam water op, wat nodig kan
wees om die lewering te handhaaf, veral met Suid-Afrika se wisselvallige reënval en rivier vloei.
Die studie het gefokus op die volgende ontwerp funksies van uitkeerwerke: (1) die inlaathoek,
wat die hoek is waarteen die struktuur in die rivier ingedruk is, (2) die inlaatopening hoogte
bo 'n datum, (3) die rivier vloei reeks waar sediment voldoende uitgeskuur word uit die gruisvangkanaal
uit en (4) die effektiwiteit en rivier vloei reeks van 'n sediment spoel aksie deur 'n
sluishek in die gruisvangkanaal.
'n Fisiese model studie was onderneem in die laboratorium van die Universiteit van Stellenbosch,
wat bestaan het uit die ontwerp van die uitkeerwerke wat getoets sou word. Die ontwerp is
gebasseer op riglyne van vorige studies, gevallestudies en hirouliese beginsels. Die bogenoemde
funksies (1-4) was bestudeer by drie strukture met prototipe keerwal hoogtes van 2.5 m, 3.5 m
en 4.5 m. Die rivier was gemodelleer as 'n reguit, reghoekige kanaal met 'n los bed oppervlakte,
wat gesimuleer is met fyngemaakte perske pitte. Sediment was ook in die sisteem ingevoer met
'n vervoerband voer sisteem.
Pompe was gebruik om water en sediment te onttrek deur die inlaatopening tydens die uitgekeerde
sediment toetse. Vloei was uitgekeer teen 'n spesifieke vloeitempo vir elke struktuur. Die
uitgekeerde sediment was gevang en geweeg. Elke struktuur was ontwerp om sediment uit te keer deur een van drie inlaatopening hoogtes, om te bepaal of 'n hoër inlaatopening hoogte die
hoeveelheid uitgekeerde sediment voldoende verminder. Die self-uitskuur effektiwiteit van die
gruisvangkanaal was bepaal deur 'n sediment vlak opmeting in die gruisvangkanaal. Vanaf die
opmeting was 'n skoonmaak vloei bepaal, wat die minimum rivier vloei is wat die inlaatopening
skoon maak van sediment oor die totale lengte. Dit was ook bepaal watter inlaathoek veroorsaak
sekondêre vloei wat die laagste skoonmaak vloei oplewer. Die sediment spoel aksie deur die
sluishek was geëvalueer deur die tyd wat dit neem om 'n vol gruisvangkanaal skoon te spoel, teen
verskeie rivier vloeitempos te bepaal. 'n Maksimum rivier vloei waarteen die guisvangkanaal
steeds effektiewelik skoon spoel was bepaal vir elke struktuur.
Dit was bevind dat tussen die 300, 450 en 600 inlaathoeke wat getoets is, lewer die 600 hoek
die laagste uitgekeerde sediment verhouding (USV) oor die reeks van strukture, asook rivier
vloeitempos wat getoets is. Die toetse het 'n rivier vloei opgelewer by elke struktuur, waar USV
'n minimum was. Gedurende die self-uitskuur toetse was dit bepaal dat 'n 450 inlaathoek beter
uitskuur in die gruisvangkanaal bevorder. Om beide funksies te bevorder word 'n 450 inlaathoek
voorgestel, omdat dit ook uitgekeerde sediment verminder en 'n laer risiko van probleme as
gevolg van te groot vloei vernouing het.
Die inlaatopening hoogte was geëvalueer met analise van die uitgekeerde sediment lading en
konsentrasie. Die gevolgtrekkings oor die inlaatopening hoogte varieer tussen struktuur groottes.
In die geval van die kleinste struktuur, met 'n 2.5 m keerwal hoogte, was die verbetering wat
waargeneem was by inlaatopeninge hoër as die eerste (laagste) inlaat, wisselvallig. In die geval
van 'n 3.5 m keerwal struktuur het die resultate getoon dat drie opeenvolgende inlaatopeninge
kan uitvoerbaar wees. In die geval van 'n 4.5 m keerwal struktuur was minder verbetering
waargeneem tussen die hoogste twee inlate. Vloed frekwensie moet bepaal of 'n inlaatopening
hoogte met 'n bokant-van-inlaat vlak van 1.6 m of 3.3 m bo minimun bedryfvlak moet ontwerp
word.
Dit was waargeneem dat gedurende die sediment spoel toetse dat versuiping van die gruisvangkanaal
muur en/of die stroomaf watervlak die spoel effektiwiteit beïnvloed. y3/y2, wat die
stroomaf vloeidiepte oor die vernoude vloeidiepte onder die sluishek van die gruisvangkanaal is, was geëvalueer as 'n indikator van effektiewe spoel aksie. Die studie het bevind dat 'n goeie
riglyn sal wees om te spoel tydens rivier vloeie waar y3/y2 < 1 is, terwyl dit ook verseker moet
word dat vloei oor die gruisvang kanaal sediment meevoer in die gruisvangkanaal.
'n Figuur wat die stroomaf vloeidiepte teenoor die sluisopening grootte plot was ontwikkel om
te dien as 'n bedryfsriglyn tot effektiewe spoel aksie. Die figuur toon zones van effektiewe en
nie-effektiewe spoel aksie aan. Verder is die waargeneemde sediment spoel aksie en self-uitskuur
reekse van elke struktuur ook grafies voorgestel. Die feit dat daar ontwerp is vir 'n spesifieke rivier scenario asook die gebrek aan variëerende
model sediment grootte, beperk die toepasbaarheid van die bevindings en gevolgtrekkings.
|
2 |
Desvio de rios para a construção de barragens. / River diversion for dam construction.Rocha, Gabriel dos Santos Cruz 25 April 2006 (has links)
As obras de desvio de rios para a construção de barragens, embora tenham caráter provisório, são de estrema importância, pois definem como o empreendimento será executado, garantindo segurança à sua construção, dentro de riscos calculados, devendo no entanto ser o mais econômica possível. As estruturas de desvio devem se encaixar no arranjo das estruturas permanentes, podendo ser utilizadas como tal. Este trabalho tem o intuito de apresentar as principais estruturas utilizadas em esquemas de desvio de rios e caracterizar sua utilização e aplicabilidade. Sempre que possível foram apresentados esquemas utilizados na prática ou previstos em projeto, para melhor exemplificar e caracterizar as diversas estruturas e as possíveis soluções para desvio de rios. / Diversion works for dam construction are temporary. Nevertheless, they are extremely important, since they define how the construction is going to be made, and assuring its safety, within calculated risks. But, they have to be as economical as possible. The diversion structures must fit the global arrangement of the project, being in some cases be used as permanent structures. This document has the objective of present the main diversion structures used in diversion works schemes, as well as characterize their utilization and applicability. Whenever possible, it was presented examples of schemes either already used or just previewed on design, to better characterize and exemplify the many structures and possible solutions for river diversion.
|
3 |
Desvio de rios para a construção de barragens. / River diversion for dam construction.Gabriel dos Santos Cruz Rocha 25 April 2006 (has links)
As obras de desvio de rios para a construção de barragens, embora tenham caráter provisório, são de estrema importância, pois definem como o empreendimento será executado, garantindo segurança à sua construção, dentro de riscos calculados, devendo no entanto ser o mais econômica possível. As estruturas de desvio devem se encaixar no arranjo das estruturas permanentes, podendo ser utilizadas como tal. Este trabalho tem o intuito de apresentar as principais estruturas utilizadas em esquemas de desvio de rios e caracterizar sua utilização e aplicabilidade. Sempre que possível foram apresentados esquemas utilizados na prática ou previstos em projeto, para melhor exemplificar e caracterizar as diversas estruturas e as possíveis soluções para desvio de rios. / Diversion works for dam construction are temporary. Nevertheless, they are extremely important, since they define how the construction is going to be made, and assuring its safety, within calculated risks. But, they have to be as economical as possible. The diversion structures must fit the global arrangement of the project, being in some cases be used as permanent structures. This document has the objective of present the main diversion structures used in diversion works schemes, as well as characterize their utilization and applicability. Whenever possible, it was presented examples of schemes either already used or just previewed on design, to better characterize and exemplify the many structures and possible solutions for river diversion.
|
4 |
Transposição e fragmentação do Rio Piumhi (Bacia do Rio São Francisco, MG): variáveis limnológicas e microcrustáceos zooplanctônicos da Lagoa dos TropeirosSonoda, Sérgio Luiz 29 June 2011 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-02T19:29:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
3891.pdf: 2152109 bytes, checksum: 922635c7df589362a274568a783b386d (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2011-06-29 / The aim of this study was to analyse the physical and chemical characteristics of Tropeiros Lake (Capitólio, MG), located in Piumhi river sub‐basin, a river diverted from the Rio Grande basin to the são Francisco River basin, and to analize the taxonomic composition, abundance, diversity and the size structure of the planktonic microcrustaceans. Physical and chemical variables in the eater were measured in situ by the multiparameter Horiba U10 probe and qualitative and quantitative zooplankton sampling was carried out in both, pelagic and littoral regions of this lake using the plankton net of 69 μm mesh size, on March, 2007. Twenty seven taxa were identified, being 18 Cladocera, 3 Copepoda Calanoida and 6 Copepoda Cyclopoida. Microcrustaceans species composition in Lagoa dos Tropeiros was much more similar to the microcrustaceans composition of the water bodies from Rio Grande basin than to those from São francisco basin. The species Sarsilatona serricauda Sars, 1901 and Microcyclops alius Kiefer, 1935 constitute new records for the state of Minas Gerais biota. The assemblages from of microcrustaceans from the littoral region had higher richness of species, higher alfa diversity, and wider size spectra than the assemblages from the pelagic region. The analysis of the normalized size spectra and linear regression analysis indicated that Lagoa dos Tropeiros has a community away from the stationary state. The accumulated curves of numerical abundance and biomass (ABC curves) were different for the lake regions characterizing the pelagic region as a non‐disturbed compartment and the littoral region as a disturbed system. The gamma parameter derived from rank‐abundance diagram slopes characterized the microcrustacean assemblage of Lagoa dos Tropeiros as typical of a low trophic state environment. / Este estudo teve como objetivo analisar as características físicas e químicas da Lagoa dos Tropeiros (Capitólio, MG), localizada na sub‐bacia do rio Piumhi, rio transposto da bacia do Rio Grande para a Bacia do Rio São Francisco e analisar a composição taxonômica, abundância diversidade e estrutura em tamanho dos microcrustáceos planctônicos As variáveis físicas e químicas foram medidas in situ por sonda multiparâmetros e foram realizadas coletas de água para análises físicas e químicas da água e coletas qualitativas e quantitativas do zooplâncton. As amostragens foram feitas nas regiões litorânea e pelágica da lagoa utilizando uma rede de plâncton de 69 μm de abertura de malha, em março de 2007. Foram identificados 27 táxons de microcrustáceos, sendo 18 de Cladocera, 3 de Copepoda Calanoida e 6 de Copepoda Cyclopoida. A composição de espécies dos microcrustáceos da Lagoa dos Tropeiros é muito mais similar à composição de microcrustáceos da bacia do Rio Grande do que à da bacia do rio São Francisco. As espécies Sarsilatona serricauda Sars,1901 e Microcyclops alius são novas ocorrências para o estado de Minas Gerais. As assembleias de microcrustáceos da região litorâna tiveram maior riqueza de espécies, maior diversidade alfa e espectro de tamanho mais amplo que as assembleias da região pelágica. A análise do espectro em tamanho normalizado dos microcrustáceos e análise da regressão linear indicaram que a Lagoa dos Tropeiros apresenta uma comunidade distante do estado estacionário. As curvas ABC e a estatítica‐W mostram resultados diferentes entre a região limnética, que foi caracterizada como um sistema não perturbado e a região litorânea, que apresentou características de um sistema perturbado. O parâmetro gama derivado das inclinações das curvas de rank‐abundância evidencia uma assembleia característica de ambiente de baixo grau de trofia.
|
5 |
Grandes obras no Nordeste: o Projeto de Transposição das Águas do Rio São FranciscoSilva, Flávio José Rocha da 13 August 2015 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-25T20:21:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Flavio Jose Rocha da Silva.pdf: 11685449 bytes, checksum: 499e0dc41d0630c401f4fb88b7b109ba (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-08-13 / This research has its focus on the São Francisco River Diversion Project. This megaproject can be classified as the biggest development project in Brazil and follows other megaprojects that promised to develop the Northeast of Brazil. The methodology used in the work was the analysis of the justifications for other megaprojects in the Northeast in the last century and how those projects were appropriated by a few economic and political groups from that region in order to take advantage of public money. We believe that the discourse of "drought victims" used by those groups was successful in demanding money from the federal government to build water reservoirs and irrigation projects along with the creation of many governmental institutions, such as the SUDENE, to develop the Northeast. This discourse collaborated to benefit the Northeastern political elite and some economic groups from other parts of Brazil which profited with the construction of those projects. Our conclusion is that the model of development that has been in place in the last decades does not respect the social and environmental characteristics of the Northeast by creating a distance between the government megaprojects and the local population, in contrast with the actions developed by some non-governmental organizations since the eighties that prioritize the local environment with its limits and potentialities. The São Francisco River Diversion Project, publicized by the government as a Project that will provide water for more than 12 million people, reproduces the historical way to deal with the problems in the Northeast by affirming a model of development that degrades the environment and does not respect the reality of those who live in the Northeast. This project impacts the São Francisco River, which already suffers from many human actions of exploitation of its resources. It also impacts many indigenous and afro-descendants communities, fisher peoples and peasants who survive from the abundance of the river. In sum, we conclude that the São Francisco River Diversion Project will be added to a long list of megaprojects that brought benefits to a few while the majority will continue disadvantaged land and water concentrations, the real cause of the social inequality in the Northeast of Brazil / Este trabalho de pesquisa tem o seu foco no Projeto de Transposição das Águas do Rio São Francisco PTARSF para os estados do Nordeste Setentrional. O objeto pesquisado pode ser classificado como a maior obra hídrica já realizada no Brasil e está inserida no campo das grandes obras que prometem levar o desenvolvimento para o Nordeste brasileiro. Nossa apreciação metodológica pautou-se primeiramente pela análise das justificativas para os outros grandes projetos naquela mesma região no último século e de como estes foram apropriados por grupos econômicos e/ou políticos locais e de outras partes do país. Para isso, corroborou o discurso de vítimas da seca amplificado pela elite nordestina com o intuito de reivindicar verbas para a açudagem, os perímetros de irrigação, além da criação de vários órgãos que supostamente trariam o desenvolvimento para o Nordeste e principalmente para o Semiárido, a exemplo da SUDENE. Diante de tantas tentativas ao longo de mais de cem anos, o que teria dado errado? A nossa conclusão é que o modelo de desenvolvimento vendido como o propulsor de melhorias para aquela área do país não respeita as características do meio ambiente local, criando uma dissonância entre os megaprojetos e os habitantes daquele lugar, diferentemente dos vários projetos de convivência com o Semiárido, que surgiram a partir dos anos 1980. O PTARSF, vendido pela propaganda governamental como uma obra que levará água para 12 milhões de pessoas e o desenvolvimento para os estados que receberão as águas do São Francisco, está reproduzindo a lógica secular das grandes obras com gastos públicos para lucros privados, além de reproduzir e ampliar um padrão de desenvolvimento em desacordo com a realidade dos que habitam a área de sua realização. Ele afeta sobremaneira o Rio São Francisco, um manancial que já enfrenta problemas por causa de várias ações antrópicas. O PTARSF também atinge várias comunidades de povos indígenas, remanescentes quilombolas, vazanteiros, pescadores artesanais, etc. Em suma, concluímos que esta é mais uma grande obra para entrar na lista daquelas cuja existência trará benefícios para uns poucos em detrimento da grande maioria da população nordestina sem lidar com as estruturas de concentração agrária e hídrica, verdadeiras causas das desigualdades socioeconômicas do Nordeste
|
6 |
Grandes obras no Nordeste: o Projeto de Transposição das Águas do Rio São FranciscoSilva, Flávio José Rocha da 13 August 2015 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T14:55:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Flavio Jose Rocha da Silva.pdf: 11685449 bytes, checksum: 499e0dc41d0630c401f4fb88b7b109ba (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-08-13 / This research has its focus on the São Francisco River Diversion Project. This megaproject can be classified as the biggest development project in Brazil and follows other megaprojects that promised to develop the Northeast of Brazil. The methodology used in the work was the analysis of the justifications for other megaprojects in the Northeast in the last century and how those projects were appropriated by a few economic and political groups from that region in order to take advantage of public money. We believe that the discourse of "drought victims" used by those groups was successful in demanding money from the federal government to build water reservoirs and irrigation projects along with the creation of many governmental institutions, such as the SUDENE, to develop the Northeast. This discourse collaborated to benefit the Northeastern political elite and some economic groups from other parts of Brazil which profited with the construction of those projects. Our conclusion is that the model of development that has been in place in the last decades does not respect the social and environmental characteristics of the Northeast by creating a distance between the government megaprojects and the local population, in contrast with the actions developed by some non-governmental organizations since the eighties that prioritize the local environment with its limits and potentialities. The São Francisco River Diversion Project, publicized by the government as a Project that will provide water for more than 12 million people, reproduces the historical way to deal with the problems in the Northeast by affirming a model of development that degrades the environment and does not respect the reality of those who live in the Northeast. This project impacts the São Francisco River, which already suffers from many human actions of exploitation of its resources. It also impacts many indigenous and afro-descendants communities, fisher peoples and peasants who survive from the abundance of the river. In sum, we conclude that the São Francisco River Diversion Project will be added to a long list of megaprojects that brought benefits to a few while the majority will continue disadvantaged land and water concentrations, the real cause of the social inequality in the Northeast of Brazil / Este trabalho de pesquisa tem o seu foco no Projeto de Transposição das Águas do Rio São Francisco PTARSF para os estados do Nordeste Setentrional. O objeto pesquisado pode ser classificado como a maior obra hídrica já realizada no Brasil e está inserida no campo das grandes obras que prometem levar o desenvolvimento para o Nordeste brasileiro. Nossa apreciação metodológica pautou-se primeiramente pela análise das justificativas para os outros grandes projetos naquela mesma região no último século e de como estes foram apropriados por grupos econômicos e/ou políticos locais e de outras partes do país. Para isso, corroborou o discurso de vítimas da seca amplificado pela elite nordestina com o intuito de reivindicar verbas para a açudagem, os perímetros de irrigação, além da criação de vários órgãos que supostamente trariam o desenvolvimento para o Nordeste e principalmente para o Semiárido, a exemplo da SUDENE. Diante de tantas tentativas ao longo de mais de cem anos, o que teria dado errado? A nossa conclusão é que o modelo de desenvolvimento vendido como o propulsor de melhorias para aquela área do país não respeita as características do meio ambiente local, criando uma dissonância entre os megaprojetos e os habitantes daquele lugar, diferentemente dos vários projetos de convivência com o Semiárido, que surgiram a partir dos anos 1980. O PTARSF, vendido pela propaganda governamental como uma obra que levará água para 12 milhões de pessoas e o desenvolvimento para os estados que receberão as águas do São Francisco, está reproduzindo a lógica secular das grandes obras com gastos públicos para lucros privados, além de reproduzir e ampliar um padrão de desenvolvimento em desacordo com a realidade dos que habitam a área de sua realização. Ele afeta sobremaneira o Rio São Francisco, um manancial que já enfrenta problemas por causa de várias ações antrópicas. O PTARSF também atinge várias comunidades de povos indígenas, remanescentes quilombolas, vazanteiros, pescadores artesanais, etc. Em suma, concluímos que esta é mais uma grande obra para entrar na lista daquelas cuja existência trará benefícios para uns poucos em detrimento da grande maioria da população nordestina sem lidar com as estruturas de concentração agrária e hídrica, verdadeiras causas das desigualdades socioeconômicas do Nordeste
|
Page generated in 0.0981 seconds