• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Conserva??o da biodiversidade nas ci?ncias sociais brasileiras: um campo em constru??o / Biodiversity conservation in the brazilian social sciences: a field under construction

SANDRONI, Laila Thomaz 17 September 2012 (has links)
Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2017-04-05T20:22:15Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2012 - Laila Thomaz Sandroni.pdf: 1078751 bytes, checksum: 13644c723f6b656012ad433b93ca1f81 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-05T20:22:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2012 - Laila Thomaz Sandroni.pdf: 1078751 bytes, checksum: 13644c723f6b656012ad433b93ca1f81 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-09-17 / CNPq / This study attempts to identify the main issues under discussion in the Brazilian social sciences on the subject of biodiversity conservation. The research started from a systematic review of the literature accessed by a careful survey of the articles published in the leading journals of social sciences in Brazil between 1992 and 2010. It was observed that the late inclusion of social sciences in this context is pervaded by their relationship with the natural sciences, since it is an inherently multidisciplinary theme built from various epistemological. The goal is to make an investigation that serve the social sciences as a means of reflection and self-knowledge, in an attempt to explain the discursive specificity of this type of knowledge in the setting of the arguments about the biodiversity conservation. Making a cross-sectional analysis of the main arguments advanced by the authors in the survey, it was revealed that there is heterogeneity in the formulation of problems and research procedures used, which is linked to a variety of disciplinary training, the research centers where they work and context of the field. This heterogeneity has demanded a greater reflection on the relationship between social sciences and natural sciences and on the practical consequences of forms of representation used. / A presente pesquisa objetiva identificar as principais quest?es em debate nas ci?ncias sociais brasileiras sobre o tema da conserva??o da biodiversidade. Partiu-se de uma revis?o sistematizada da bibliografia proveniente de um levantamento criterioso dos artigos publicados nos principais peri?dicos de ci?ncias sociais brasileiros entre 1992 e 2010. Observou-se que a inser??o tardia das ci?ncias sociais neste contexto ? perpassada pela rela??o destas com as ci?ncias naturais, posto que se trata de uma tem?tica intrinsecamente multidisciplinar constru?da a partir de variados fundamentos epistemol?gicos. A meta ? fazer uma investiga??o que sirva ?s ci?ncias sociais como forma de reflex?o e autoconhecimento, numa tentativa de explicita??o da especificidade discursiva deste tipo de conhecimento no cen?rio dos argumentos sobre a conserva??o da biodiversidade. Fazendo uma an?lise transversal dos principais argumentos propostos pelos autores no levantamento, foi poss?vel perceber que h? uma heterogeneidade na formula??o de problem?ticas e nos procedimentos de pesquisa utilizados, que est? ligada ? variedade de forma??o disciplinar dos autores, aos centros de pesquisa onde trabalham e ao contexto do campo na contemporaneidade. Essa heterogeneidade exigiu uma reflex?o maior sobre as rela??es entre as ci?ncias sociais e as ci?ncias naturais e sobre as consequ?ncias pr?ticas das formas de representa??o utilizadas.

Page generated in 0.1015 seconds