In January 2015, three terrorists killed 17 people in Paris. In a time in which fears of immigrants and Muslims are spread in Europe and right wing movements are gaining support, this event built a foundation for actors of centre right and right wing parties to use the attacks in their favor. The aim of this study was to investigate how French and German media reported on the attacks, which measures were suggested in response to the attacks by political actors and how media facilitated possible securitization moves. By conducting this case study for which French and German newspaper articles were collected through the database Lexis Nexis and analyzed through content and discourse analysis, a contribution to security studies was made. The analytical framework used, Securitization Theory with an integration of Framing Theory, proved valuable as it indicated that media, by framing the issues connected to the Paris Attacks in favor of securitizing actors, facilitated securitization moves. Securitizing actors were mainly centre right politicians in Germany and the French right wing party National Front. Furthermore, German newspaper articles on the attacks outnumbered French newspaper articles, indicating the high level of media attention to the key event. However, the role of Islam was mentioned in more French newspaper articles than it was the case in German newspapers. Overall, terrorism and Islam were portrayed as a threat to the referent objects of the West, its citizens and values, fostering an essentialist and dichotomist understanding of the West and Islam.

Since 2009 thousands of Eritreans, as well as other, sub-Saharan migrants have become victims of human trafficking in the Sinai Peninsula. These occurrences are linked to the newly coined notion of “Sinai Trafficking” which has been labeled as a new form of human trafficking. According to reports, released or escaped victims have disclosed information regarding collusion between traffickers and Egyptian security forces. Further, there have been reports that trafficking victims from the Sinai are put in detention centers, prisons and police stations in Egypt and are often charged or prosecuted for crimes committed in their capacity as victims of trafficking. Although Egypt is bound to respect and uphold its international law obligations national criminal law concerning human trafficking, the continuation of the situation in Sinai has demonstrated an unwillingness or inability to prevent, suppress and punish the crime. Consequently, the purpose of this thesis is to examine and interpret international law as well as Egypt’s national criminal legislation and policies, pertaining to human trafficking, to determine if there are any inadequacies or gaps in the international legal framework with regards to human trafficking or if it’s rather Egypt’s implementation of the law that is faulty. Moreover, a human rights perspective, relevant theories, literature related to the conceptual framework of human trafficking, the status and treatment of non-nationals and securitization of migration will be applied. With regards to the international law on human trafficking, it has been assessed that there are some inadequacies in relation to protection and support granted to trafficking victims. Egypt, has adopted relevant international instruments concerning human trafficking. Further, Egypt has enacted national legislation that corresponds to the Anti-Trafficking Protocol, which might indicate that it is not Egypt’s national legislation that is inadequate and rather that the international law concerning human trafficking. Increasingly restrictive immigration laws, policies and States conduct towards migrants indicate that migration has been securitized. The Egyptian authorities conduct and approach towards migrants could indicate that Egypt has securitized the migration issue. Further, the difficulty to distinguish smuggled migrants from trafficking victims could result in the possibility of trafficking victims being criminalized. The world of today remains globalized and thus the political order that follows and its accompanying conceptual and subsequent legal framework of human trafficking as an organized crime contributes to the trafficking situation in Sinai as well as to human trafficking in general.

This thesis explores the discourses available to teachers in navigating and making sense of their role in the securitization of high schools. My analysis is based on semi-structured interviews conducted with nine teachers working in urban schools in Toronto. Drawing on frameworks from post-colonial, critical race, and urban education studies, I argue that school securitization is not just complicated by racism, but structured and enabled by it. While there is an urgent need to resist the implementation of particular security and surveillance measures that intensify the targeted disqualification of racialized youth, it is equally if not more important to uncover and resist the ways that racial thinking organizes a much wider range of classroom encounters and pedagogical practices. I urge teachers to interrogate their investments in the categories and subject positions that race thinking makes available, including those that are desirable and pleasurable.

Univ., Diss.--Duisburg-Essen, 2004. / Literaturverz. S. [367] - 392.

Zugl.: Hamburg, Univ., Diss., 2008.

Zugl.: Bonn, Univ., Diss., 2007

Univ., Diss.--Linz, 2004.

Bachelor-Arbeit Univ. St. Gallen, 2007.

Master-Arbeit Univ. St. Gallen, 2008.

Master-Arbeit Univ. St. Gallen, 2007.