<p>This study is about to see whether the two models representing the strategies of lean production is to use and apply in different companies. The models are structured in two different ways in which one of them is checking the softer elements of lean production in the form of leadership and strategies. This model is called Lesat and is based on interviewquestions. The second model, called "learning to see" is about identifying flows. This, together shall then give an idea of how mature companies are when it comes to a whole in the concept of lean production, and susceptibility to use these models to their respective companies.</p><p> </p><p>The study is conducted in two companies, SKF couplings systems and AQ parkoprint. SKF is a company that makes connections through a special method called the oil injection method. Parkoprint produces mainly parking meters of all kinds, this is done in close cooperation with customers and their preferences.</p><p> </p><p>The study has been carried out by means of interviews of individuals in leadership positions in each business. We also interviewed operations personnel and has developed facts through observation and computer systems to make the flow surveys.</p><p> </p><p>The results show that the models themselves are useful and functional. However, it became more difficult to use the Lesat showing soft data, rather than "learn to see" that focuses mostly on flows. This is for several reasons. One of the reasons was that the companies examined were not quite at the level existing strategies and leadership that Lesat calls, this makes it difficult to estimate where in the assessment firms ports when the people interviewed do not really are in line or understand how the model or concept works in some areas. In addition to this we experienced it difficult to make a fair assessment when the model in any way based on subjective assessments from companies and then marked in a way that also tends to be of subjective nature. From this perspective, we believe that Lesat model fit better in a study of the companies that has made more of work on lean production and has achieved a higher degree of maturity, and thus become a little easier to rate and provide a more realistic sense.</p><p> </p><p>It appears that the models worked with different conditions and also with different results. However, the two worked so well that it clearly has been able to see the potential strengths, weaknesses and possible improvements in the respective organization. This means that the combination of the two satisfactory to achieve a whole, and that any use, ie organization, can help to improve and lead organizations to more effectively work with and against the lean production.</p>

This study is about to see whether the two models representing the strategies of lean production is to use and apply in different companies. The models are structured in two different ways in which one of them is checking the softer elements of lean production in the form of leadership and strategies. This model is called Lesat and is based on interviewquestions. The second model, called "learning to see" is about identifying flows. This, together shall then give an idea of how mature companies are when it comes to a whole in the concept of lean production, and susceptibility to use these models to their respective companies.   The study is conducted in two companies, SKF couplings systems and AQ parkoprint. SKF is a company that makes connections through a special method called the oil injection method. Parkoprint produces mainly parking meters of all kinds, this is done in close cooperation with customers and their preferences.   The study has been carried out by means of interviews of individuals in leadership positions in each business. We also interviewed operations personnel and has developed facts through observation and computer systems to make the flow surveys.   The results show that the models themselves are useful and functional. However, it became more difficult to use the Lesat showing soft data, rather than "learn to see" that focuses mostly on flows. This is for several reasons. One of the reasons was that the companies examined were not quite at the level existing strategies and leadership that Lesat calls, this makes it difficult to estimate where in the assessment firms ports when the people interviewed do not really are in line or understand how the model or concept works in some areas. In addition to this we experienced it difficult to make a fair assessment when the model in any way based on subjective assessments from companies and then marked in a way that also tends to be of subjective nature. From this perspective, we believe that Lesat model fit better in a study of the companies that has made more of work on lean production and has achieved a higher degree of maturity, and thus become a little easier to rate and provide a more realistic sense.   It appears that the models worked with different conditions and also with different results. However, the two worked so well that it clearly has been able to see the potential strengths, weaknesses and possible improvements in the respective organization. This means that the combination of the two satisfactory to achieve a whole, and that any use, ie organization, can help to improve and lead organizations to more effectively work with and against the lean production.

La thèse se situe dans le champ de la didactique professionnelle et concerne la formation initiale des sages-femmes qui s’inscrit depuis 2009 dans le cadre européen appelé processus de Bologne. Une première étude quantitative, descriptive concernant l’utilisation du référentiel métier et compétences a permis de considérer l’orientation que chaque étudiant donne à sa formation en fonction de sa motivation initiale et de son projet professionnel. Le référentiel n’est pas privilégié dans l’organisation de la formation initiale en sciences maïeutiques. Une deuxième étude quantitative, descriptive est conduite auprès des équipes enseignantes et des étudiants sur le contenu des enseignements en formation initiale. Les résultats sont paradoxaux. Si les équipes enseignantes utilisent des moyens pédagogiques innovants, elles se servent de leurs expériences personnelles pour proposer des dispositifs de formation, ce qui ne correspond pas forcément aux prérequis des étudiants en formation initiale ; les étudiants font peu de lien entre les connaissances théoriques et leur activité en stage.Une enquête qualitative est alors conduite par entretiens auprès des étudiants. Elle met en évidence que les étudiants s’inscrivent dans un apprentissage par compétences et dans une démarche réflexive. Ils utilisent certains dispositifs mis en place par les équipes enseignantes. L’encadrement en stage qui n’a pas été réformé avec l’universitarisation de la formation (2011) participe à cette démarche réflexive. La thèse précise les chemins de l’apprentissage des étudiants en formation initiale en sciences maïeutiques. Les étudiants utilisent l’autoévaluation pour se situer en formation. / The research is in the purview of professional didactics and concerned the initial training in Maieutic Sciences, that is, since 2009, in the European framework called Bologna process. A first, quantitative, descriptive study about using of the Referencial of Job and Skills take care of the direction that each student gives his training according to its initial motivation and their professional project. This referencial is not privileged in the organization of initial formation in Maieutic Sciences. A second quantitative study, descriptive is undertaken with the teaching staff and students about the content of teaching in initial formation. The results are paradoxical. If the teaching teams use innovative teaching methods, they use their personal experiences to offer training devices, which does not necessarily correspond to the prerequisites of students in initial formation; the students make little link between theoretical knowledge and training in their internship.A qualitative survey is then conducted by interviews with students. It shows that students enroll in a learning skills, as well as a reflective process. They use certain features created by the teaching staff. The coaching during the internship has not been reformed by the 2011 program participate in this reflection process.The thesis has clarified the ways of student learning in maieutic sciences. The students use self-assessment to lie in formation.