To make sense of why states are dramatically shifting their agendas to focus on their diasporic population abroad, this project builds a theoretical model which makes sense of decisive shifts in political behavior between states and their external populations. A two-fold argument is presented to explain these shifts. First, analyses of diaspora should treat diaspora not as a bounded entity but as a process or social practice. This allows for a multi-level analysis which neither negates the role individuals play in the formation of diasporic identity nor denies the agency of states which actively engage in their own unique approach to identify, label or shape what constitutes their diaspora. Second, state-diasporic engagement practices can be better understood as an institutional practice, which in turn allow us to explain state behavioral change in terms of their diasporic populations and what factors elucidate diaspora to respond. It also allows us to ask two-fold questions - a) who the sending state targets, why they are targeted and when states increase their engagement with their diasporic populations abroad; and b) what policy tools states develop to encourage dependable contributions of the diaspora to its political agenda. These theoretical arguments are then applied to address the modern Indian state's approach and its shifting agenda to its diaspora. The intent is to provide a historical foundation from which to make sense of why the Indian diaspora evolved from a political liability under Jawaharlal Nehru to an instrument of strength in the early 1990s. This thesis concludes with an exploration of the current Prime Minister Narendra Modi's discourse and state practices and suggests that India's accelerated engagement of the Indian diaspora to be representative of a muscular Hindu nationalist agenda. In short, Modi's engagement of the Indian diaspora should be understood as part of a nation-building project which seeks to communicate to both domestic and international audiences alike that India and Indians are first and foremost Hindu. / Graduate

No description available.

No description available.

[pt] Este trabalho discute a aplicação e limites da defesa dos direitos do indivíduo, enquadrada na proteção diplomática e sustentada no exercício de interpretar e fazer cumprir a Convenção de Viena sobre Relações Consulares de 1963. A discussão focará situações onde migrantes são condenados a penas severas, até mesmo a pena de morte, como no caso de milhares de mexicanos nos Estados Unidos da América. Com este objetivo, serão discutidos os casos emblemáticos LaGrand, de 2001, e Avena, de 2003, apresentados à Corte Internacional de Justiça pela Alemanha e México, respectivamente. / [en] This paper discusses the application and limits of the defense of the rights of the individual, framed in diplomatic protection and sustained in the exercise of interpreting and enforcing the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. The discussion will focus on situations where migrants are sentenced to severe penalties, even the death penalty, as in the case of thousands of Mexicans in the United States of America. To this end, the emblematic cases LaGrand, from 2001, and Avena, from 2003, brought before the International Court of Justice by Germany and Mexico, respectively, will be discussed.