Global ETD Search

1	Djupekologi och grundekologi : Finns det någon skillnad? Petersson, Åsa January 2006 (has links) <p>Uppsatsen tar upp Arne Naess djupekologi. Den undersöker djupekologins struktur och vilka krav som ställs på en teori för att den skall vara en djupekologi. Uppsatsen tar även upp skillnader mellan djupekologi och grundekologi på en praktisk nivå. Uppsatsen behandlar Warwick Fox kritik rörande djupet i djupekologin och Arne Naess svar på den kritiken. Författaren till uppsatsen finner att Fox kritik inte är helt träffande och att Naess svar på kritiken är för svag.</p> / <p>This paper discusses Arne Naess’ theory of deep ecology. It investigates the structure of deep ecology and what conditions a theory has to fulfil to be a deep ecology. The paper demonstrates differences between deep ecology and shallow ecology on a practical level. The paper presents a criticism put forward by Warwick Fox which focuses on the deepness of deep ecology, and an answer from Arne Naess on this criticism. The author of this paper finds Fox’ criticism not quite convincing, and that Naess’ answer is too weak.</p> Naess Fox Deep ecology shallow ecology self-realisation ecology Djupekologi grundekologi självförverkligande ekologi Naess Fox. Philosophy subjects Filosofiämnen
2	Djupekologi och grundekologi : Finns det någon skillnad? Petersson, Åsa January 2006 (has links) Uppsatsen tar upp Arne Naess djupekologi. Den undersöker djupekologins struktur och vilka krav som ställs på en teori för att den skall vara en djupekologi. Uppsatsen tar även upp skillnader mellan djupekologi och grundekologi på en praktisk nivå. Uppsatsen behandlar Warwick Fox kritik rörande djupet i djupekologin och Arne Naess svar på den kritiken. Författaren till uppsatsen finner att Fox kritik inte är helt träffande och att Naess svar på kritiken är för svag. / This paper discusses Arne Naess’ theory of deep ecology. It investigates the structure of deep ecology and what conditions a theory has to fulfil to be a deep ecology. The paper demonstrates differences between deep ecology and shallow ecology on a practical level. The paper presents a criticism put forward by Warwick Fox which focuses on the deepness of deep ecology, and an answer from Arne Naess on this criticism. The author of this paper finds Fox’ criticism not quite convincing, and that Naess’ answer is too weak. Naess Fox Deep ecology shallow ecology self-realisation ecology Djupekologi grundekologi självförverkligande ekologi Naess Fox. Philosophy subjects Filosofiämnen
3	Deep ecology: should we embrace this philosophy? Louw, Gert Petrus Benjamin 03 1900 (has links) The planet is in a dismal environmental state. This state may be remedied by way of an integrated approach based on a holistic vision. This research examines which ecological ideology best suits current conditions for humans to re-examine their metaphysical understanding of nature; how we can better motivate people to embrace a more intrinsic ecological ideology; and finally, how we can motivate people to be active participants in their chosen ideology. I will attempt to show that Deep Ecology is the most suitable ecosophy (ecological philosophy) to embrace; in doing so I will look at how Oriental and occidental religion and philosophy altered (and continues to alter) the way we perceive nature. I will show how destructive, but also caring and constructive, humanity can be when interacting with the environment. The Deep Ecological and Shallow Ecological principles will be look at, as well as criticism and counter-criticism of these ecosophies. KEY TERMS: Deep Ecology, Shallow Ecology, anthropocentrism, ecocentrism, extrinsic values, intrinsic values, motivational drive, ecosophy © University / Philosophy, Practical and Systematic Theology / M.A. (Philosophy) Deep ecology Shallow ecology Anthropocentrism Ecocentrism Extrinsic values Intrinsic values Motivational drive Ecosophy 179.1 Deep ecology -- Philosophy Deep ecology -- Religious aspects Environmental ethics Human ecology -- Philosophy Human ecology -- Religious aspects
4	Beskouings oor volhoubare ontwikkeling en die krisis in die natuur Treurnicht, Stephanus Philippus 30 June 2004 (has links) Text in Afrikaans / During the last few decades the need existed for a new framework to give direction to development and ecological thought in respect of the sustaining of nature in order to place development and ecological thought within the limits of nature. However, development thought and the debate relating to nature are to some extent still treated in theory and practice as two separate entities. One of the current challenges for sustainable development is to reconcile the development and ecological branches of this debate. The thesis firstly explains the origin and characteristics of sustainable development. Secondly, the crisis in nature is discussed, followed by a discussion of the most important ecological views relating to sustainable development. Then issues in development thought that relates to sustainable development is discussed, as well as the changing emphasis in development thought that stimulated the growth of sustainable development. The mainstream development view, as the other main branch of sustainable development thinking, is then discussed. In conclusion, some issues relating to the operationalisation of sustainable development is discussed. / Development Studies / D. Litt. et Phil. (Ontwikkelingstudies) Sustainable development Development thought Ecological integrity Gender imbalances Indigenous knowledge systems Participatory rural appraisal Participatory learning and action Global warming Erosion Pollution Economic growth Specie imbalances Specie loss Deep ecology Shallow ecology Eco-feminism Social ecology Co-evolution Technocentrism Alternative development Gaia 333.7 Sustainable development Nature conservation Conservation of natural resources Ecological integrity Participatory rural appraisal
5	Beskouings oor volhoubare ontwikkeling en die krisis in die natuur Treurnicht, Stephanus Philippus 30 June 2004 (has links) Text in Afrikaans / During the last few decades the need existed for a new framework to give direction to development and ecological thought in respect of the sustaining of nature in order to place development and ecological thought within the limits of nature. However, development thought and the debate relating to nature are to some extent still treated in theory and practice as two separate entities. One of the current challenges for sustainable development is to reconcile the development and ecological branches of this debate. The thesis firstly explains the origin and characteristics of sustainable development. Secondly, the crisis in nature is discussed, followed by a discussion of the most important ecological views relating to sustainable development. Then issues in development thought that relates to sustainable development is discussed, as well as the changing emphasis in development thought that stimulated the growth of sustainable development. The mainstream development view, as the other main branch of sustainable development thinking, is then discussed. In conclusion, some issues relating to the operationalisation of sustainable development is discussed. / Development Studies / D. Litt. et Phil. (Ontwikkelingstudies) Sustainable development Development thought Ecological integrity Gender imbalances Indigenous knowledge systems Participatory rural appraisal Participatory learning and action Global warming Erosion Pollution Economic growth Specie imbalances Specie loss Deep ecology Shallow ecology Eco-feminism Social ecology Co-evolution Technocentrism Alternative development Gaia 333.7 Sustainable development Nature conservation Conservation of natural resources Ecological integrity Participatory rural appraisal

1

Page generated in 0.0425 seconds