Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-04T18:32:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Cleonice Xavier da Silva1.pdf: 1178270 bytes, checksum: e20cdde0b513fa925460447d11531709 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-02-22 / The present work analyze how the Pedagogy course has been graduated the lecturer in front of the education changes from the recently economic, politic and social transformation and how they have been contributed for the development of the social commitment from the lecturer face this context. We come from of the presupposed that the answer for the challengers that have been showed by the contemporary world demand for the lecturer graduation in the Pedagogy course as a social process of acquisition and building knowledge that became possible the development of the lecturer who knows the challengers have been get to a on this new time, for contribute in the senses to promote a human and democratic education. The documental legislation that regulate the Pedagogy course since it was introduced reveal the problems which have followed up the lecturer graduation process in the historical trajectory in the social and economic development from the country and put in evidence the scenario of precarious of the graduation in our historical moment. Face his situation, we can conclude that the pragmatic conception of the education and the quickness of the lecturer graduation courses have guided the education reforms and the lecturer politic graduation have become difficult the promotion of a huge human graduation and the development of the lecturer social commitment. / O presente trabalho analisa como o curso superior em Pedagogia tem formado o (a) educador (a) face ?s mudan?as educacionais advindas das recentes transforma??es econ?micas, pol?ticas e sociais e como tem contribu?do para o desenvolvimento do compromisso social do educador diante deste contexto. Partimos do pressuposto de que a resposta aos desafios que o mundo contempor?neo apresenta demanda por uma forma??o docente no curso de Pedagogia, como um processo social de aquisi??o e constru??o de conhecimentos que possibilite o desenvolvimento do educador consciente dos desafios colocados ? educa??o nestes novos tempos, para que possa contribuir no sentido de promover uma educa??o mais humana e democr?tica. O levantamento bibliogr?fico e a an?lise documental das legisla??es que regulamentam o curso de Pedagogia, desde a sua implanta??o, revelam os problemas que t?m acompanhado o processo de forma??o docente em sua trajet?ria hist?rica no contexto do desenvolvimento econ?mico e social do pa?s e, coloca, em evid?ncia, o cen?rio de precariza??o desta forma??o no atual momento hist?rico. Diante deste quadro, conclui-se que a concep??o pragmatista de educa??o e o aligeiramento dos cursos de forma??o docente que t?m orientado as reformas educacionais e as pol?ticas de forma??o docente dificultam a promo??o de uma ampla forma??o humana e o desenvolvimento do compromisso social do educador.

Le partenariat est reconnu et promu par de nombreux scientifiques comme un mode de régulation sociale qui est appelé à remplacer les modes traditionnels de régulation axés sur la centralisation du pouvoir. Les conditions de réussite du partenariat sont largement documentées. Pourtant, le débat reste ouvert concernant l’efficacité ou non de ce type d’arrangement social et les dérives auxquelles il peut donner lieu. Cette thèse de doctorat représente le produit de l’analyse d’une expérience partenariale sous l’angle des compromis sociaux. Le partenariat analysé a été le dispositif utilisé par la première communauté au Québec ayant adopté l’approche Vieillissement en santé (VES), qui fut conçue en 2008 et promue par l’Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ). La mise en œuvre de cette expérience a été réalisée par un établissement de santé d’une région semi-urbaine du Québec à travers un large partenariat territorial. La recherche s’est penchée sur la période comprise entre le lancement de la démarche en 2010 et la réforme du réseau de la santé et des services sociaux survenue en 2015. Les résultats de notre recherche montrent que, pour être possible et efficace, un partenariat doit être bâti sur une capacité collective à élaborer des compromis sociaux. Lorsqu’ils s’appuient sur la bonne volonté et la bonne foi de toutes les parties impliquées dans un projet commun et que tous les acteurs concernés sont engagés et participent de manière équitable à la démarche, les compromis sociaux issus du processus de négociation favorisent la réussite du partenariat. Cette thèse apporte une contribution aux travaux de réflexion autour du thème du vieillissement en santé et offre des pistes permettant de bonifier l’apport du partenariat proposé par cette approche comme mécanisme d’adaptation de la société au vieillissement général de la population. Les principaux compromis sociaux que notre recherche nous a permis d’identifier les suivants : (1) l’accord sur le partage de leadership entre les principaux acteurs, (2) l’entente sur la délimitation (ou la redélimitation) de l’expertise, du statut et du rôle de chaque acteur, (3) la réalisation du pragmatisme clairvoyant, (4) le principe convenu de décomplexification de l’accès à l’information, (5) l’instauration de l’habilitation mutuelle fonctionnelle, (6) le déploiement du décloisonnement sectoriel, et (7) l’accord sur la reconfiguration du territoire. Par ailleurs, la négociation de ces compromis sociaux fut rendue possible par différents facteurs d’ordre individuel, communicationnel, relationnel, organisationnel et procédural. Toutefois, les efforts des acteurs de terrain pour bâtir leurs relations sur des compromis sociaux ne peuvent compenser les lacunes dans la relation liant les instances de tutelle et leurs représentants locaux. Effectivement, tant pour leur déploiement et leur maintien que pour leur légitimation, les compromis sociaux obtenus localement ont besoin d’être soutenus par des compromis globaux institués entre les paliers gouvernementaux supérieurs et les instances locales. L’atteinte de ces compromis globaux se fait par le biais de structures intermédiaires de soutien et d’accompagnement permettant d’assurer un arrimage entre les approches de type top-down et celles de type bottom-up. / Abstract : Partnership is known and promoted by many researchers as a social regulation mode that can be called upon to become an alternative to traditional regulation modes based on the centralization of power. Conditions leading to a successful partnership are well known and documented. However, the debate remains open over the efficiency of this type of social arrangement and the failures to which it can give rise. The purpose of this doctoral thesis is to study a partnership experience carried out by the first community in Quebec to adopt the Vieillissement en santé (Healthy Aging) approach, which was developed in 2008 and promoted by the Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ). The implementation of this experiment was carried out by a health care center located in a semi-rural region in Quebec through a large territorial partnership. Our research focused on the period between the implementation of the Vieillissement en santé approach in 2010 and the reform of the health and social services network that took place in 2015. The results of our research show that in order to be conceivable and effective, a genuine partnership must be established on the collective capacity to reach social compromises. When they are based on the good will and good faith of actors that are motivated and really committed to a common project and able to participate equitably in the process, social compromises agreed upon by all parties by way of negotiation contribute to the fulfilment of the conditions that lead to a genuine and successful partnership. This doctoral thesis provides additional thought to the reflection on healthy aging and suggests some avenues to be explored to improve the contribution of the partnership that the Vieillissement en santé approach propose as an adaptation mechanism of the society to the issue of an ageing population. In the context of that experience, the following main social compromises were identified : (1) the agreement between the various actors regarding leadership; (2) the agreement about the delimitation or redelimitation of expertise, status and role of the different actors; (3) the achievement of farseeing pragmatism; (4) the application of the principle of decomplexification of access to information; (5) the implementation of functional mutual empowerment; (6) the implementation of sectorial decompartmentalization; and (7) the agreement pertaining to the reconfiguration of the territory. The negotiation of such social compromises was made possible by individual, relational, communicational organizational and procedural factors. However, efforts made by the actors from the community to establish their relationships on social compromises are not sufficient to compensate for the deficiencies in the relationship between the governing body and its local representatives. The preservation, legitimization and implementation of social compromises at the local level need to be supported by social compromises reached between the highest levels of government and local entities. These social compromises can be achieved through the establishment of intermediary structures of accompaniment and support that will insure the articulation between top-down and bottom-up approaches.