The beginning of this study is from sociology of occupations and depends on various viewpoints of functionalism, postmodernism, exchange theory and motivation theory to discuss the developing processes of professionalism and the licensure in the modern society; moreover, to reorganize all different kinds of views to the licensure. Secondly, researchers explain differences of the licensure and social work licensure of each country from America, Japan, Taiwan, and Hong Kong etc. In addition, according to the literature review result, it affects external environmental factors of carrying out Taiwan social work license system and describes developing veins of Taiwan social work licensure. The study is through the qualitative research methods of interviews guide and focused group. Collecting all information of twenty-two social service workers to attitude of the social work licensure in southern Taiwan, and from the data we can conclude that we can offer to social workers a stigma or the glory from the social license examination. Besides, we also can provide function or anti-function, and an order or disorder of the social work license. Furthermore, the examination and teaching which is the first step of the social work licensure or in the educational field. Moreover, the impact or a response and a transition or an existence of the social work license examination and practical field. Professionalization or deprofessionalization of the social work license, starting or re-starting of the professional association, and working circumstances or labor conditions of the social work licensure and professional organization. In terms of the conclusion, researchers provide suggestions differently to ministry of examination, practical field, educational field and specialized association.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-02T20:39:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 3926.pdf: 1330769 bytes, checksum: 9e56c6c003b95da36bf4396f0093f5f2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-04-27 / Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos / The present work seeks to analyze the relationship between the mediators in the judicial sector Judicial Mediation in the city of São Paulo called Comarca Azul and agents of the world of law: lawyers and judges. Just as lawyers, mediators develop different strategies to achieve better positions and distinctions within this field. Our goal was to understand the meanings of these local around the mediation field marked by the pursuit of ownership of the practice of this activity and the authority to speak and act with legitimacy. The methodology used was based on a qualitative approach with interviews, participant observation and document analysis, aiming to realize negotiations and dispute within the group of professionals in the legal world. / Com a presente pesquisa busca-se analisar as relações existentes entre os mediadores judiciais no âmbito do setor de Mediação Judicial na cidade do interior paulista denominada Comarca Azul e os agentes do mundo do direito: advogados e juízes. Da mesma forma que os advogados, os mediadores desenvolvem diversas estratégias para alcançar as melhores posições e distinções dentro deste campo. Nosso objetivo foi compreender os sentidos destas disputas locais em torno da mediação, campo marcado pela busca da apropriação da prática desta atividade e pela autoridade de falar e agir com legitimidade. A metodologia empregada foi baseada numa abordagem qualitativa com a realização de entrevistas, observação participante e análise documental, com intuito de perceber as negociações e a disputa dentro do grupo dos profissionais do mundo jurídico.

Cette thèse étudie les réseaux et des pratiques de banquiers soviétiques à la tête de banques commerciales appartenant à l'URSS établies sur les places financières en Occident à l'époque de la guerre froide à partir de 1971. Membres de l'élite de la Banque du commerce extérieur de l'URSS et de la Banque d'Etat, ils dirigeaient les filiales à Paris, Londres, Singapour, Zurich et Beyrouth parmi d'autres... Située à la croisée de la sociohistoire financière et de la sociologie des élites et des professions, cette investigation puise dans les archives des banques soviétiques et les récits de vie pour comprendre l'identité professionnelle et sociale particulière de ces banquiers. Malgré l'adoption de sociabilités caractéristiques des élites bancaires transnationales, ils entretiennent un rapport d'allégeance fort quoique ambiguë avec Moscou, centré sur leur rôle de défenseurs des intérêts financiers soviétiques dans la finance mondialisée. L'analyse de leur identité comme "liminale" au sens anthropologique permet de comprendre pourquoi une prosopographie de 140 carrières post-sovétiques les place parmi les managers technocratiques et non les propriétaires de nouvelles banques russes. Le concept de "financial statecraft" exercée au nom de la "sécurité économique" sert de grille de lecture pour expliquer ces trajectoires et propose une clef d'analyse pour comprendre la finance russe internationale contemporaine. / This thesis looks at the networks and careers of Soviet capitalist bankers to analyze how global finance interacted with Cold War- and Russian financial history. Part of the elite of the Bank of Foreign Trade of the USSR and of the Soviet State bank, these bankers managed Soviet-owned commercial banks in the West in Paris, London, Singapore, Zurich and Beirut among other financial hubs. Competing with top western financial institutions, they practiced capitalist finance decades before perestroika reforms. At the crossroads of financial socio-history and the sociology of elites and occupations, this investigation draws on the archives of Soviet banks and life stories to understand the particular professional and social identity of these bankers. Despite the adoption of many sociablities characteristic of transnational banking elites, they maintained a strong but ambiguous allegiance to Moscow, centered on their role as defenders of Soviet financial interests on global markets. The anthropological concept of liminality explains why a prosopography of 140 post-Soviet careers shows that they became technocratic managers rather than owners of new Russian banks. The concept of "financial statecraft" in the name of "economic security" serves as a reading grid to explain these trajectories and offers a key to understanding contemporary Russian international finance.