<p>The paper studies share repurchases done by 50 randomly chosen U.S. publicly traded companies between 1996 and 2007 and checks if they could have been done at more advantageous prices for long-term shareholders in the two years following repurchases. The paper argues that the lower the price at which a repurchase is done the better it is for long-term shareholders.</p><p> </p><p>The results indicate that on average for 37 % of the years in which a company repurchased shares, it could have done it at a price at least 25 % lower in the next two years. When the results are weighted to take into account the dollar amounts spent on repurchases each year, the figure increases to 56 %. The paper looks also at if the repurchases could have been done at a price at least 50 % lower in the next two years. The unweighted results show that on average it would have been possible for 17 % of the years in which a company repurchased shares. When the result is weighted for the dollars spent on repurchases each year the proportion increases to 32 %.</p><p> </p><p>The results show also that the companies increased massively their repurchases just before the stock market crash that started in the late 2007.</p>

The paper studies share repurchases done by 50 randomly chosen U.S. publicly traded companies between 1996 and 2007 and checks if they could have been done at more advantageous prices for long-term shareholders in the two years following repurchases. The paper argues that the lower the price at which a repurchase is done the better it is for long-term shareholders.   The results indicate that on average for 37 % of the years in which a company repurchased shares, it could have done it at a price at least 25 % lower in the next two years. When the results are weighted to take into account the dollar amounts spent on repurchases each year, the figure increases to 56 %. The paper looks also at if the repurchases could have been done at a price at least 50 % lower in the next two years. The unweighted results show that on average it would have been possible for 17 % of the years in which a company repurchased shares. When the result is weighted for the dollars spent on repurchases each year the proportion increases to 32 %.   The results show also that the companies increased massively their repurchases just before the stock market crash that started in the late 2007.

Through ¡§Economic Value Added¡¨ (EVA) approach, this study tries to observe the correlation between formation process of king stocks and their market prices. We hope to provide a useful tool to investors, which helps to realize value of king stocks and conditions of finding king stocks among numerous of listed companies, in order to make investment decisions efficiently and more precisely, and to obtain a good margin of profit. We gather financial information of those listed companies, which they had ever deemed as king stocks between 1992 and 2011. They basically have some features in common, i.e. companies with positive prospects, high market price, and newly listed. In this research, we utilize WACC, MV, COV and FGV to analyze EVA of king stocks, and find out the following empirical results: 1.When WACC of a king stock trends up in the long-run, it has a greater opportunity to improve and trigger COV trending up as well. 2.When COV of a king stock trends up, it brings stable performances of MV continuously. 3.FGV has a positive correlation with market price. When FGV of a king stock trends up, it triggers its market price to go up. In this research, we see that when MV and COV are convergent, we¡¦re able to use FGV to anticipate future trend of the stock. We also expect this study further facilitates king-stock companies themselves to set up workable market price stabilizing plans and select the best timing for stock buybacks. Keywords: King Stock, EVA, WACC, MV, COV, FGV, Stock Buybacks.

Aktieåterköp är en snabbt växande företeelse och är på grund av tidigare lagar relativt nytt i Sverige jämfört med andra utvecklade länder. Aktieåterköp kan i vissa fall användas som ett substitut för utdelning, men kan även genomföras för att signalera marknaden och förhindra företagsuppköp. För att få en större förståelse för aktieåterköp har ett fåtal studier undersökt dess samband till ägarförhållanden på olika sätt. Dessa studier visar olika resultat i olika länder, vilket kan tyda på att landspecifika faktorer spelar roll vid undersökning av ägarförhållanden. Den aktuella studien undersöker hur ägarkoncentrationen och det interna ägandet ser ut i bolag som återköper aktier, samt om det finns någon skillnad i ägarkoncentration och internt ägande mellan aktieåterköpande och icke-återköpande bolag som är noterade på Stockholmsbörsen. Studien har en kvantitativ ansats och använder en tvärsnittsdesign för att besvara hypoteserna och jämföra de två grupperna. Hypoteserna är framställda utifrån den teoretiska referensramen som främst grundar sig i agentteori och asymmetrisk information. Resultatet visar hur ägarkoncentrationen och det interna ägandet ser ut för bolag som återköper egna aktier på Stockholmsbörsen 2019. Små skillnader kunde ur studiens resultat observeras mellan de två grupperna av observationer. Skillnaderna uppvisade ingen statistisk signifikans. / Share repurchases are a rapidly growing phenomenon and is relatively new in Sweden compared to other developed countries due to previous swedish laws. Share repurchases are often seen as a substitute for dividends, but can also be implemented to signal the market and prevent corporate acquisitions. Few studies have investigated share repurchases relation to ownership in various ways in order to understand the phenomenon further. These studies show different results in different countries, which may indicate that country-specific factors play a role when investigating ownership. The current study examines the ownership concentration and the internal ownership in companies that repurchase shares, and also if there is a difference in ownership concentration and internal ownership between companies that repurchase stocks and those who don’t. These companies are listed on Nasdaq Stockholm. The study has a quantitative approach and uses a cross-sectional design to answer the hypotheses and compare the two selected groups. The hypotheses are produced on the basis of the theoretical frame of reference, which is mainly based on agency theory and asymmetrical information. The results of the study indicate how the concentration and internal ownership looks for companies that repurchase their own shares on Nasdaq Stockholm. Small differences could be observed from the study’s results between the two groups of observations. The differences showed no statistical significance.