Programmers don't just have to write programs, they are have to reason about them. Programming languages aren't just tools for instructing computers what to do, they are tools for reasoning. And, it isn't just programmers who reason about programs: compilers and other tools reason similarly as they transform from one language into another one, or as they optimize an inefficient program into a better one. Languages, both surface languages and intermediate ones, need therefore to be both efficiently implementable and to support effective logical reasoning. However, these goals often seem to be in conflict. This dissertation studies programming language calculi inspired by the Curry-Howard correspondence, relating programming languages to proof systems. Our focus is on calculi corresponding logically to classical sequent calculus and connected computationally to abstract machines. We prove that these calculi have desirable properties to help bridge the gap between reasoning and implementation. Firstly, we explore a persistent conflict between extensionality and effects for lazy functional programs that manifests in a loss of confluence. Building on prior work, we develop a new rewriting theory for lazy functions and control which we first prove corresponds to the desired equational theory and then prove, by way of reductions into a smaller system, to be confluent. Next, we turn to the inconsistency between weak-head normalization and extensionality. Using ideas from our study of confluence, we develop a new operational semantics and series of abstract machines for head reduction which show us how to retain weak-head reduction's ease of implementation. After demonstrating the limitations of the above approach for call-by-value or types other than functions, we turn to typed calculi, showing how a type system can be used not only for mixing different kinds of data, but also different evaluation strategies in a single program. Building on variations of the reducibility candidates method such as biorthogonality and symmetric candidates, we present a uniform proof of strong normalization for our mixed-strategy system which works so long as all the strategies used satisfy criteria we isolate. This dissertation includes previously published co-authored material.

Cette thèse concerne la combinaison du lambda-calcul et de la réécriture, dont nous étudions principalement deux propriétés : la confluence et la normalisation forte. Nous commençons par étudier sous quelles conditions la combinaison d'une relation de réécriture conditionnelle confluente au lambda-calcul donne une relation de réécriture confluente. Ensuite nous nous intéressons aux preuves de normalisation forte de lambda-calculs typés utilisant la technique de réductibilité. Notre contribution la plus importante est une comparaison de diverses variantes de cette technique, utilisant comme outil de comparaison la manière dont ces variantes s'étendent à la réécriture et dont elles prennent en compte les types unions et les types existentiels implicites. Enfin, nous présentons un critère, basé sur un système de types contraints, pour la normalisation forte de la réécriture conditionnelle combinée au lambda-calcul. Notre approche étend des critères de terminaison existants qui utilisent des annotations de taille. C'est à notre connaissance le premier critère de terminaison pour la réécriture conditionnelle avec membres droits d'ordre supérieur qui prenne en compte, dans l'argument de terminaison, de l'information issue de la satisfaction des conditions des règles de réécriture / This thesis is about the combination of lambda-calculus with rewriting. We mainly study two properties: confluence and strong normalization. We begin by studying under which conditions the combination of a confluent conditional rewrite relation to the lambda-calculus leads to a confluent relation. Next, we study strong normalization proofs of typed lambda-calculi that use the reducibility technique. Our main contribution is a comparison of variants of this technique, with respect to how they extend to rewriting and how they handle union and implicit existential types. Finally, we present a termination criterion for the combination of conditional rewriting and lambda-calculus based on a constrained type system. Our approach, which extends known criteria that use sized types, is to our knowledge the first termination criterion for conditional rewriting with higher-order right-hand sides that takes into account in the termination argument some information generated by the satisfaction of the conditions of the rewrite rules