Spelling suggestions: "subject:"8tudent difficulties"" "subject:"astudent difficulties""
1 |
The role of productive struggle in teaching and learning middle school mathematicsWarshauer, Hiroko Kawaguchi 03 February 2012 (has links)
Students’ struggle with learning mathematics is often cast in a negative light.
Mathematics educators and researchers, however, suggest that struggling to make
sense of mathematics is a necessary component of learning mathematics with
understanding. In order to investigate the possible connection between struggle
and learning, this study examined students’ productive struggle as students worked
on tasks of higher cognitive demand in middle school mathematics classrooms.
Students’ productive struggle refers to students’ “effort to make sense of
mathematics, to figure something out that is not immediately apparent” (Hiebert &
Grouws, 2007, p. 287) as opposed to students’ effort made in despair or frustration.
As an exploratory case study using embedded multiple cases, the study
examined 186 episodes of student‐teacher interactions in order to identify the kinds
and nature of student struggles that occurred in a naturalistic classroom setting as
students engaged in mathematical tasks focused on proportional reasoning. The
study identified the kinds of teacher responses used in the interaction with the
students and the types of resolutions that occurred.
The participants were 327 6th and 7th grade students and their six
mathematics teachers from three middle schools located in mid‐size Texas cities.
Findings from the study identified four basic types of student struggles: get started,
carry out a process, give a mathematical explanation, and express misconception
and errors. Four kinds of teacher responses to these struggles were identified as
situated along a continuum: telling, directed guidance, probing guidance, and
affordance. The outcomes of the student‐teacher interactions that resolved the
students’ struggles were categorized as: productive, productive at a lower level, or
unproductive. These categories were based on how the interactions maintained the
cognitive level of the implemented task, addressed the externalized student
struggle, and built on student thinking.
Findings provide evidence that there are aspects of student‐teacher
interactions that appear to be productive for student learning of mathematics. The
struggle‐response framework developed in the study can be used to further
examine the phenomenon of student struggle from initiation, interaction, to its
resolution, and measure learning outcomes of students who experience struggle to
make sense of mathematics. / text
|
2 |
Using a Cross-Cutting Theoretical Framework to Explore Difficulties Learning Human Anatomy and PhysiologySlominski, Tara Nicole January 2020 (has links)
Across the United States, Human Anatomy and Physiology (HA&P) courses typically have some of the highest withdrawal and failure rates on college campuses. These high enrollment course typically serve as gate-keepers for those individuals with aspirations of entering the medical field. In light of the growing national shortage of healthcare professionals, there is a pressing need to improve the state of HA&P education at a national scale. The goal of this dissertation is to understand why undergraduate students struggle to succeed in HA&P courses. I leveraged multiple frameworks from biology education research, physics education research, and cognitive psychology to understand the source of student difficulty in HA&P. I used a mixed-methods approach to unpack how students reason about the complex phenomena covered in HA&P classes. The data presented here suggest student difficulties in HA&P are not the product of a culmination of individual conceptual difficulties. Rather, this work suggests students have difficulty reasoning with the many complex systems that are at the heart of HA&P curriculum. Students appear to frame these complex systems in a manner that activates reasoning strategies that are often in conflict with course goals. The findings from this work advocate for a dynamic view of student cognition that recognizes the implications of context features on student reasoning of complex systems.
|
3 |
Identifying and addressing student difficulties and misconceptions: examples from physics and from materials science and engineeringRosenblatt, Rebecca J. 20 June 2012 (has links)
No description available.
|
4 |
Evaluation of a Novel Biochemistry Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE)Stefan M Irby (6326255) 15 May 2019 (has links)
<p>Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) have been described in a range of educational contexts. Although various learning objectives, termed anticipated learning outcomes (ALOs) in this project, have been proposed, processes for identifying them may not be rigorous or well-documented, which can lead to inappropriate assessment and speculation about what students actually learn from CUREs. Additionally, evaluation of CUREs has primarily relied on student and instructor perception data rather than more reliable measures of learning.This dissertation investigated a novel biochemistry laboratory curriculum for a Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE) known as the Biochemistry Authentic Scientific Inquiry Lab (BASIL). Students participating in this CURE use a combination of computational and biochemical wet-lab techniques to elucidate the function of proteins of known structure but unknown function. The goal of the project was to evaluate the efficacy of the BASIL CURE curriculum for developing students’ research abilities across implementations. Towards achieving this goal, we addressed the following four research questions (RQs): <b>RQ1</b>) How can ALOs be rigorously identified for the BASIL CURE; <b>RQ2</b>) How can the identified ALOs be used to develop a matrix that characterizes the BASIL CURE; <b>RQ3</b>) What are students’ perceptions of their knowledge, confidence and competence regarding their abilities to perform the top-rated ALOs for this CURE; <b>RQ4</b>) What are appropriate assessments for student achievement of the identified ALOs and what is the nature of student learning, and related difficulties, developed by students during the BASIL CURE? To address these RQs, this project focused on the development and use of qualitative and quantitative methods guided by constructivism and situated cognition theoretical frameworks. Data was collected using a range of instruments including, content analysis, Qualtrics surveys, open-ended questions and interviews, in order to identify ALOs and to determine student learning for the BASIL CURE. Analysis of the qualitative data was through inductive coding guided by the concept-reasoning-mode (CRM) model and the assessment triangle, while analysis of quantitative data was done by using standard statistical techniques (e.g. conducting a parried t-test and effect size). The results led to the development of a novel method for identifying ALOs, namely a process for identifying course-based undergraduate research abilities (PICURA; RQ1; Irby, Pelaez, & Anderson 2018b). Application of PICURA to the BASIL CURE resulted in the identification and rating by instructors of a wide range of ALOs, termed course-based undergraduate research abilities (CURAs), which were formulated into a matrix (RQs 2; Irby, Pelaez, & Anderson, 2018a,). The matrix was, in turn, used to characterize the BASIL CURE and to inform the design of student assessments aimed at evaluating student development of the identified CURAs (RQs 4; Irby, Pelaez, & Anderson, 2018a). Preliminary findings from implementation of the open-ended assessments in a small case study of students, revealed a range of student competencies for selected top-rated CURAs as well as evidence for student difficulties (RQ4). In this way we were able to confirm that students are developing some of the ALOs as actual learning outcomes which we term VLOs or verified learning outcomes. In addition, a participant perception indicator (PPI) survey was used to gauge students’ perceptions of their gains in knowledge, experience, and confidence during the BASIL CURE and, therefore, to inform which CURAs should be specifically targeted for assessment in specific BASIL implementations (RQ3;). These results indicate that, across implementations of the CURE, students perceived significant gains with large effect sizes in their knowledge, experience, and confidence for items on the PPI survey (RQ3;). In our view, the results of this dissertation will make important contributions to the CURE literature, as well as to the biochemistry education and assessment literature in general. More specifically, it will significantly improve understanding of the nature of student learning from CUREs and how to identify ALOs and design assessments that reveal what students actually learn from such CUREs - an area where there has been a dearth of available knowledge in the past. The outcomes of this dissertation could also help instructors and administrators identify and align assessments with the actual features of a CURE (or courses in general), use the identified CURAs to ensure the material fits departmental or university needs, and evaluate the benefits of students participating in these innovative curricula. Future research will focus on expanding the development and validation of assessments so that practitioners can better evaluate the efficacy of their CUREs for developing the research competencies of their undergraduate students and continue to render improvements to their curricula.</p>
|
Page generated in 0.1066 seconds