Spelling suggestions: "subject:"studiendesign"" "subject:"studiendesigns""
1 |
Randomized controlled trials - a matter of designSpieth, Peter Markus, Kubasch, Anne Sophie, Penzlin, Ana Isabel, Illigens, Ben Min-Woo, Barlinn, Kristian, Siepmann, Timo 06 January 2017 (has links) (PDF)
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the hallmark of evidence-based medicine and form the basis for translating research data into clinical practice. This review summarizes commonly applied designs and quality indicators of RCTs to provide guidance in interpreting and critically evaluating clinical research data. It further reflects on the principle of equipoise and its practical applicability to clinical science with an emphasis on critical care and neurological research. We performed a review of educational material, review articles, methodological studies, and published clinical trials using the databases MEDLINE, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The most relevant recommendations regarding design, conduction, and reporting of RCTs may include the following: 1) clinically relevant end points should be defined a priori, and an unbiased analysis and report of the study results should be warranted, 2) both significant and nonsignificant results should be objectively reported and published, 3) structured study design and performance as indicated in the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement should be employed as well as registration in a public trial database, 4) potential conflicts of interest and funding sources should be disclaimed in study report or publication, and 5) in the comparison of experimental treatment with standard care, preplanned interim analyses during an ongoing RCT can aid in maintaining clinical equipoise by assessing benefit, harm, or futility, thus allowing decision on continuation or termination of the trial.
|
2 |
Gaining information about home visits in primary care: methodological issues from a feasibility studyVoigt, Karen, Taché, Stephanie, Klement, Andreas, Fankhaenel, Thomas, Bojanowski, Stefan, Bergmann, Antje 21 July 2014 (has links) (PDF)
Background: Home visits are part of general practice work in Germany. Within the context of an expanding elderly population and a decreasing number of general practitioner (GPs), open questions regarding the organisation and adequacy of GPs’ care in immobile patients remain. To answer these questions, we will conduct a representative primary data collection concerning contents and organisation of GPs’ home visits in 2014. Because this study will require considerable efforts for documentation and thus substantial involvement by participating GPs, we conducted a pilot study to see whether such a study design was feasible. Methods: We used a mixed methods design with two study arms in a sample of teaching GPs of the University Halle. The quantitative arm evaluates participating GPs and documentation of home visits. The qualitative arm focuses on reasons for non-participation for GPs who declined to take part in the pilot study. Results: Our study confirms previously observed reasons for non-response of GPs in the particular setting of home visits including lack of time and/or interest. In contrast to previous findings, monetary incentives were not crucial for GPs participation. Several factors influenced the documentation rate of home visits and resulted in a discrepancy between the numbers of home visits documented versus those actually conducted. The most frequently reported problem was related to obtaining patient consent, especially when patients were unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive deficits. Conclusions: The results of our feasibility study provide evidence for improvement of the study design and study instruments to effectively conduct a documentation-intensive study of GPs doing home visits. Improvement of instructions and questionnaire regarding time variables and assessment of the need for home visits will be carried out to increase the reliability of future data. One particularly important methodological issue yet to be resolved is how to increase the representativeness of home visit care by including the homebound patient population that is unable to provide informed consent.
|
3 |
Gaining information about home visits in primary care: methodological issues from a feasibility studyVoigt, Karen, Taché, Stephanie, Klement, Andreas, Fankhaenel, Thomas, Bojanowski, Stefan, Bergmann, Antje 21 July 2014 (has links)
Background: Home visits are part of general practice work in Germany. Within the context of an expanding elderly population and a decreasing number of general practitioner (GPs), open questions regarding the organisation and adequacy of GPs’ care in immobile patients remain. To answer these questions, we will conduct a representative primary data collection concerning contents and organisation of GPs’ home visits in 2014. Because this study will require considerable efforts for documentation and thus substantial involvement by participating GPs, we conducted a pilot study to see whether such a study design was feasible. Methods: We used a mixed methods design with two study arms in a sample of teaching GPs of the University Halle. The quantitative arm evaluates participating GPs and documentation of home visits. The qualitative arm focuses on reasons for non-participation for GPs who declined to take part in the pilot study. Results: Our study confirms previously observed reasons for non-response of GPs in the particular setting of home visits including lack of time and/or interest. In contrast to previous findings, monetary incentives were not crucial for GPs participation. Several factors influenced the documentation rate of home visits and resulted in a discrepancy between the numbers of home visits documented versus those actually conducted. The most frequently reported problem was related to obtaining patient consent, especially when patients were unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive deficits. Conclusions: The results of our feasibility study provide evidence for improvement of the study design and study instruments to effectively conduct a documentation-intensive study of GPs doing home visits. Improvement of instructions and questionnaire regarding time variables and assessment of the need for home visits will be carried out to increase the reliability of future data. One particularly important methodological issue yet to be resolved is how to increase the representativeness of home visit care by including the homebound patient population that is unable to provide informed consent.
|
4 |
Die Verordnung von Schlaf- und Beruhigungsmitteln: Ein Mixed-methods-Ansatz zur Exploration einer Drucksituation / The prescription of hypnotics and sedatives: A mixed-methods design to explore a pressure situationWeiß, Vivien 19 November 2018 (has links)
No description available.
|
5 |
Arbeitsplätze und Tätigkeitsmerkmale berufstätiger pflegender Angehöriger. Befunde aus der Wiener Studie zur informellen Pflege und Betreuung älterer Menschen 2008 (VIC 2008).Trukeschitz, Birgit, Mühlmann, Richard, Schneider, Ulrike, Ponocny, Ivo, Österle, August January 2009 (has links) (PDF)
Die vorliegende Studie untersucht, ob und wie sich Arbeitsplätze und Tätigkeiten von informell pflegenden berufstätigen Personen und berufstätigen Personen, die gegenwärtig keiner informellen Betreuungstätigkeit nachgehen, unterscheiden. Die Grundlage dafür bilden zwei empirische Erhebungen in Wien, wobei auf Informationen von 743 informell pflegenden Erwerbstätigen und 612 nicht pflegenden Erwerbstätigen zurückgegriffen werden kann. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass sich in der Gruppe der informell pflegenden Berufstätigen Personen mit geringerem Qualifikationsniveau und geringerem Einkommen finden, als in der Vergleichsgruppe. Dies deutet darauf hin, dass in höheren Bildungs- und Einkommensgruppen mehr Möglichkeiten bestehen, die Pflege und Betreuung von nahestehenden älteren Menschen auf anderem Weg zu organisieren, so dass Berufstätigkeit und informelle Betreuungspflichten seltener (oder in geringerem Ausmaß) kombiniert werden. Mit Blick auf Arbeitsplatzmerkmale ist festzustellen, dass sich Erwerbstätige mit und ohne informelle Pflege- oder Betreuungspflichten im Hinblick auf die Tätigkeit in bestimmten Wirtschaftssektoren und auf die vertraglich vereinbarte Arbeitszeit kaum unterscheiden. Die geringere Zahl an Überstunden weist auf zeitliche Konkurrenzen zwischen informeller Pflege und Berufstätigkeit hin. Die flexibleren Arbeitszeitarrangements der abhängig beschäftigten Personen mit informellen Betreuungspflichten sowie der höhere Anteil an Selbständigen in dieser Gruppe lassen zudem eine förderliche Wirkung gewisser Formen der Arbeitsgestaltung für die Vereinbarkeit von informeller Pflege und Erwerbstätigkeit ableiten. / Series: Forschungsberichte des Forschungsinstituts für Altersökonomie
|
6 |
Randomized controlled trials - a matter of designSpieth, Peter Markus, Kubasch, Anne Sophie, Penzlin, Ana Isabel, Illigens, Ben Min-Woo, Barlinn, Kristian, Siepmann, Timo 06 January 2017 (has links)
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the hallmark of evidence-based medicine and form the basis for translating research data into clinical practice. This review summarizes commonly applied designs and quality indicators of RCTs to provide guidance in interpreting and critically evaluating clinical research data. It further reflects on the principle of equipoise and its practical applicability to clinical science with an emphasis on critical care and neurological research. We performed a review of educational material, review articles, methodological studies, and published clinical trials using the databases MEDLINE, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The most relevant recommendations regarding design, conduction, and reporting of RCTs may include the following: 1) clinically relevant end points should be defined a priori, and an unbiased analysis and report of the study results should be warranted, 2) both significant and nonsignificant results should be objectively reported and published, 3) structured study design and performance as indicated in the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement should be employed as well as registration in a public trial database, 4) potential conflicts of interest and funding sources should be disclaimed in study report or publication, and 5) in the comparison of experimental treatment with standard care, preplanned interim analyses during an ongoing RCT can aid in maintaining clinical equipoise by assessing benefit, harm, or futility, thus allowing decision on continuation or termination of the trial.
|
Page generated in 0.0716 seconds