No description available.

No description available.

Thesis (LL. M.)--Judge Advocate General's School, United States Army, 1975. / "April 1975." Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 103-115). Also issued in microfiche.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1966. / eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (doctoral)--İstanbul Üniversitesi, 1988. / At head of title: İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Summary in English. Includes bibliographical references (p. 190-202).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1973. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.

This paper presents an extended analysis of my two recent feature documentaries, RFK Must Die: The Assassination of Bobby Kennedy (2008) and Children of the Revolution (2010), which seek to challenge state narratives and demystify the lives and actions of three central characters – Robert Kennedy’s convicted assassin Sirhan Sirhan, the German terrorist Ulrike Meinhof and Japanese Red Army leader Fusako Shigenobu. I explore key issues that arose during the production of these films, and the strategies a documentary filmmaker can use to re-investigate and re-present the lives of political subversives, using Pierre Bourdieu’s ‘field theory’ and Frederic Jameson’s ‘three levels of narrative’ as my theoretical framework. With RFK Must Die, I stress the primacy of the research and writing of documentaries in their power to challenge conventional wisdom and examine the interplay between historian, filmmaker and investigator in finding an alternative history. I explore the historiography of both Kennedy assassinations and the historical reliance on independent filmmakers to re-examine the state’s evidence and present the case for the defence. I also explore what issues affect credible witness testimony and what audiovisual evidence can tell us about a crime scene. I explore two key elements of Children of the Revolution: the decision to tell the stories of Meinhof and Shigenobu ‘through the eyes of their daughters’ and the use of archive concerning their revolutionary movements. I present a case study of my working relationship with Meinhof’s daughter, Bettina Röhl, analysing the complex issues of trust, identity and authorship that arose in telling Meinhof’s story from another person’s perspective. I also discuss the critical misalignment between the cost of archive and the budgets and prices paid for documentaries, and analyse the hypothesis of the recent Hargreaves Report (2011) that the audiovisual archive sector ‘is not fit for purpose for the digital age’.

Thesis (M.A.)--Carleton University, 2003. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 143-156). Also available in electronic format on the Internet.

Les débats sur la spécificité ou non d’une écriture féminine à caractère sexuée, l’investissement exponentiel des femmes dans le champ littéraire de ces dernières décennies dans des thématiques variées et des discours transgressif et subversif, justifient notre intérêt pour l’analyse du discours de femmes dans la fiction littéraire contemporaine. En littérature comme dans d’autres disciplines, les discours des femmes sont presque toujours en conflit entre le besoin de dire les hiérarchies sociales, et celui de revendiquer une légitimité universelle. Aussi, à travers une analyse immanente et structurelle des textes qui constituent notre corpus à savoir : Riwan ou le chemin de sable (Ken Bugul,), Les vaisseaux du coeur (Benoîte Groult), L’empreinte de l’ange (Nancy Huston), La Joueuse de go (Shan Sa), ce travail de recherche s’interroge sur la spécificité du discours de ces femmes et la valeur de l’autofiction associé à ces discours. En nous servant des méthodes de l’analyse du discours et des Women Studies, cette thèse se donne de lire les thématiques, le contour des stratégies discursives des femmes, ce qu’elles disent d’elles et du monde qui relèvent ou non de l’influence féministe afin d’en dévoiler la performativité. / The debates on the specificity or not of a feminine gendered writing. The exponential investment of women in the literary field of these recent decades, in various themes, justify our interest of discourse analysis of women in contemporary literary fiction. In literature as in other discipline, the women’s discourses are mostly in conflict between the need to say social hierarchies of genders and to claim universal legitimacy. Also, through an immanent and structural analysis of the texts that constitute our corpus: Riwan ou le chemin de sable (Ken Bugul,), Les vaisseaux du coeur (Benoîte Groult), L’Empreinte de l’ange (Nancy Huston), La Joueuse de go (Shan Sa). This research is about the specificity of these women discourses, and the autofiction value associated with these discourses. Thoroughly using the methods of Discourse Analysis and Women Studies, this thesis aims to read themes, the outline of women's discursive strategies, what they say about them and the world that is or not influenced by feminism and then reveals the performativity of their discourse.

No description available.