Spelling suggestions: "subject:"sweet sorghum"" "subject:"sweet orghum""
1 |
Economic feasibility of ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice in TexasMorris, Brittany Danielle 15 May 2009 (has links)
Environmental and political concerns centered on energy use from gasoline have
led to a great deal of research on ethanol production. The goal of this thesis is to
determine if it is profitable to produce ethanol in Texas using sweet sorghum juice.
Four different areas, Moore, Hill, Willacy, and Wharton Counties, using two
feedstock alternatives, sweet sorghum only and sweet sorghum and corn, will be
analyzed using Monte Carlo simulation to determine the probability of economic
success. Economic returns to the farmers in the form of a contract price for the average
sweet sorghum yield per acre in each study area and to the ethanol plant buying sweet
sorghum at the contract price will be simulated and ranked.
The calculated sweet sorghum contract prices offered to farmers are $9.94,
$11.44, $29.98, and $36.21 per ton in Wharton, Willacy, Moore, and Hill Counties,
respectively. The contract prices are equal to the next most profitable crop returns or ten
percent more than the total cost to produce sweet sorghum in the study area. The wide variation in the price is due to competing crop returns and the sweet sorghum growing
season.
Ethanol production using sweet sorghum and corn is the most profitable
alternative analyzed for an ethanol plant. A Moore County ethanol plant has the highest
average net present value of $492.39 million and is most preferred overall when using
sweet sorghum and corn to produce ethanol. Sweet sorghum ethanol production is most
profitable in Willacy County but is not economically successful with an average net
present value of $-11.06 million. Ethanol production in Hill County is least preferred
with an average net present value of $-712.00 and $48.40 million when using sweet
sorghum only and sweet sorghum and corn, respectively.
Producing unsubsidized ethanol from sweet sorghum juice alone is not profitable
in Texas. Sweet sorghum ethanol supplemented by grain is more economical but would
not be as profitable as producing ethanol from only grain in the Texas Panhandle.
Farmers profit on average from contract prices for sweet sorghum when prices cover
total production costs for the crop.
|
2 |
The economic feasibility of producing sweet sorghum as an ethanol feedstock in MississippiLinton, Joseph Andrew 10 December 2010 (has links)
This study examines the feasibility of producing sweet sorghum as an ethanol feedstock in Mississippi. An enterprise budgeting system is used along with estimates of transportation costs to estimate farmers’ breakeven costs for producing and delivering sweet sorghum biomass. This breakeven cost for the farmer, along with breakeven costs for the producer based on wholesale ethanol price, production costs, and transportation and marketing costs for the refined ethanol, is used to estimate the amounts that farmers and ethanol producers would be willing to accept (WTA) and willing to pay (WTP), respectively, for sweet sorghum biomass. These WTA and WTP estimates are analyzed by varying key factors in the biomass and ethanol production processes. Deterministic and stochastic models are used to estimate profits for sweet sorghum and competing crops in two representative counties in Mississippi, with sweet sorghum consistently yielding negative per-acre profits in both counties.
|
3 |
Avaliação do potencial do material de sorgo Sacarino ADV 2010 para produção de etanol e silagem, em dois cortes, na região oeste do Paraná / Sorghum material potential assessment sacarino ADV 2010 for ethanol and Silage production in two courts in the western region of ParanáGerke, Lincoln Villi 27 February 2015 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-10T15:14:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DissertacaoLincolnGerke.pdf: 1910648 bytes, checksum: 6358009ffae74f406d3f40ede319052c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-02-27 / The sorghum was investigated as a food source to replace corn and alternative to
sugar cane for ethanol production. Experimental in the State University of Paraná-
UNIOESTE West station in Rondon-PR, with the hybrid ADV 2010, which was
ensiled and processed with the same equipment already used in the processing of
corn and sugarcane, produced a quantity of biomass that exceeded the volume of
165,000 kg of fresh weight per hectare in two sections with an ethanol production of
1,035 liters per hectare in the 1st section and 695 liters per hectare in regrowth,
resulting in a cost of R$ 1.26 per liter produced in a rural property. The chemical
composition of silage dry matter, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, ash and
crude protein were relevant in the silage. The results showed that there is viability in
producing ethanol from sweet sorghum in rural properties, an additional investment.
The economic potential of the material, addition of ethanol and silage extends to the
biomass, which can be used for other purposes, and food, can be dried and
incorporated into animal feed (fiber) in digesters supply or production steam boilers. / O sorgo sacarino foi investigado como fonte de alimento em substituição ao milho e
alternativa à cana de açúcar para a produção de etanol. Na Estação Experimental da
Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná-UNIOESTE em Marechal Cândido
Rondon-PR, com o híbrido ADV 2010, que foi ensilado e processado com os
mesmos equipamentos já usados no processamento de milho e cana, produziu uma
quantidade de biomassa que superou o volume de 165.000 kg de massa fresca por
hectare em dois cortes, com uma produção de etanol de 1.035 litros por hectare no
1º corte e de 695 litros por hectare no rebrote, resultando num custo de R$ 1,26 por
litro produzido em uma propriedade rural. A composição bromatológica da silagem
em matéria seca, fibra em detergente ácido, fibra em detergente neutro, matéria
mineral e proteína bruta mostraram-se relevantes nas silagens. Os resultados
mostraram que há viabilidade em produzir etanol a partir do sorgo sacarino em
propriedades rurais, mediante um investimento adicional. O potencial econômico do
material, além da produção de etanol e silagem, se estende à biomassa, que pode
ser usada para outros fins, além de alimentação, também pode ser secado e
incorporado à rações (fibras), em alimentação de biodigestores ou produção de
vapor em caldeiras.
|
4 |
Management of biofuel sorghums in KansasDooley, Scott J. January 1900 (has links)
Master of Science / Department of Agronomy / Scott A. Staggenborg / Current demand for ethanol production is stressing feedstock production. Previous
research has shown sweet sorghum and photoperiod sensitive sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.)
Moench] as viable feedstocks which may supplement or replace current feedstocks. Studies
were conducted at two dryland locations in north central and northeast Kansas in 2008 and 2009
to determine the effects of cultivar, nitrogen fertilizer rate, plant density, and harvest date on
sweet sorghum juice and biomass yields. The cultivar study indicated the cultivar ‘M81E’
generally had the greatest yield. Other cultivars were not well suited for this region. No
significant results were found in the nitrogen rate trial, indicating sweet sorghum may be
insensitive to nitrogen fertilizer applications. The plant density trial results indicated that sweet
sorghum possess a great ability to compensate for plant spacing. No differences were found in
juice yields across densities, and the only difference found in total dry biomass was at the highest
plant density. Results from the harvest date study indicate that sweet sorghum harvest should be
delayed until at least the grain soft dough stage and can be continued for at least 10 days after a
killing freeze without a yield penalty. Delaying harvest allowed for an increase in total dry
matter and fermentable carbohydrates without a decrease in juice yield. Two studies were
conducted at two dryland locations in northcentral and northeast Kansas in 2008 and 2009 to
determine the effects of plant density on photoperiod sensitive sorghum yields, with an
additional study to determine the effects of winter weathering. Photoperiod sensitive sorghum
was found to be similarly insensitive to plant density, with few differences found in total dry
biomass yield. Yields were found to decrease significantly due to winter weathering. A final
study was conducted to examine a variety of sorghums as biofuel feedstocks. Photoperiod
sensitive sorghum yielded the greatest in 2008 while sweet sorghum yielded less. In 2009, sweet
and photoperiod sensitive sorghum yielded less than the cultivar TAMUXH08001. Sweet
sorghum yields are generally the greatest with ‘M81E’ and when harvested after soft dough.
Yields of both sorghums are occasionally influenced by plant density.
|
5 |
Efficient extraction method to collect sugar from sweet sorghumJia, Fei, Chawhuaymak, Jeerwan, Riley, Mark, Zimmt, Werner, Ogden, Kimberly January 2013 (has links)
BACKGROUND:Sweet sorghum is a domesticated grass containing a sugar-rich juice that can be readily utilized for ethanol production. Most of the sugar is stored inside the cells of the stalk tissue and can be difficult to release, a necessary step before conventional fermentation. While this crop holds much promise as an arid land sugar source for biofuel production, a number of challenges must be overcome. One lies in the inherent labile nature of the sugars in the stalks leading to a short usable storage time. Also, collection of sugars from the sweet sorghum stalks is usually accomplished by mechanical squeezing, but generally does not collect all of the available sugars.RESULTS:In this paper, we present two methods that address these challenges for utilization of sweet sorghum for biofuel production. The first method demonstrates a means to store sweet sorghum stalks in the field under semi-arid conditions. The second provides an efficient water extraction method that can collect as much of the available sugar as feasible. Operating parameters investigated include temperature, stalk size, and solid-liquid ratio that impact both the rate of sugar release and the maximal amount recovered with a goal of low water use. The most desirable conditions include 30degreesC, 0.6 ratio of solid to liquid (w/w), which collects 90 % of the available sugar. Variations in extraction methods did not alter the efficiency of the eventual ethanol fermentation.CONCLUSIONS:The water extraction method has the potential to be used for sugar extraction from both fresh sweet sorghum stalks and dried ones. When combined with current sugar extraction methods, the overall ethanol production efficiency would increase compared to current field practices.
|
6 |
Crop model review and sweet sorghum crop model parameter developmentPerkins, Seth A. January 1900 (has links)
Master of Science / Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering / Kyle Douglas-Mankin / Opportunities for alternative biofuel feedstocks are widespread for a number of reasons: increased environmental and economic concerns over corn production and processing, limitations in the use of corn-based ethanol to 57 billion L (15 billion gal) by the Energy Independence and Security Act (US Congress, 2007), and target requirements of 136 billion L (36 billion gal) of renewable fuel production by 2022. The objective of this study was to select the most promising among currently available crop models that have the potential to model sweet sorghum biomass production in the central US, specifically Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas, and to develop and test sweet sorghum crop parameters for this model.
Five crop models were selected (CropSyst, CERE-Sorghum, APSIM, ALMANAC, and SORKAM), and the models were compared based on ease of use, model support, and availability of inputs and outputs from sweet sorghum biomass data and literature. After reviewing the five models, ALMANAC was selected as the best suited for the development and testing of sweet sorghum crop parameters. The results of the model comparison show that more data are needed about sweet sorghum physiological development stages and specific growth/development factors before the other models reviewed in this study can be readily used for sweet sorghum crop modeling.
This study used a unique method to calibrate the sweet sorghum crop parameter development site. Ten years of crop performance data (Corn and Grain Sorghum) for Kansas Counties (Riley and Ellis) were used to select an optimum soil water (SW) estimation method (Saxton and Rawls, Ritchie et al., and a method that added 0.01 m m [superscript]-1 to the minimum SW value given in the SSURGO soil database) and evapotranspiration (ET) method (Penman-Montieth, Priestley-Taylor, and Hargraeves and Samani) combination for use in the sweet sorghum parameter development. ALMANAC general parameters for corn and grain sorghum were used for the calibration/selection of the SW/ET combination. Variations in the harvest indexes were used to simulate variations in geo-climate region grain yield. A step through comparison method was utilized to select the appropriate SW/ET combination. Once the SW/ET combination was selected the combination was used to develop the sweet sorghum crop parameters.
Two main conclusions can be drawn from the sweet sorghum crop parameter development study. First, the combination of Saxton and Rawls (2006) and Priestley-Taylor (1972) (SR-PT) methods has the potential for wide applicability in the US Central Plains for simulating grain yields using ALMANAC. Secondly, from the development of the sweet sorghum crop model parameters, ALMANAC modeled biomass yields with reasonable accuracy; differences from observed biomass values ranged from 0.89 to 1.76 Mg ha [superscript]-1 (2.8 to 9.8%) in Kansas (Riley County), Oklahoma (Texas County), and Texas (Hale County). Future research for sweet sorghum physiology, Radiation Use Efficiency/Vapor Pressure Deficit relationships, and weather data integration would be useful in improving sweet sorghum biomass modeling.
|
7 |
Heterosis and Composition of Sweet SorghumCorn, Rebecca J. 2009 December 1900 (has links)
Sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) has potential as a bioenergy feedstock due to
its high yield potential and the production of simple sugars for fermentation. Sweet
sorghum cultivars are typically tall, high biomass types with juicy stalks and high sugar
concentration. These sorghums can be harvested, milled, and fermented to ethanol using
technology similar to that used to process sugarcane. Sweet sorghum has advantages in
that it can be planted by seed with traditional planters, is an annual plant that quickly
produces a crop and fits well in crop rotations, and it is a very water-use efficient crop.
Processing sweet sorghum is capital intensive, but it could fit into areas where sugarcane
is already produced. Sweet sorghum could be timed to harvest and supply the sugar mill
during the off season when sugarcane is not being processed, be fit into crop rotations, or
used in water limiting environments. In these ways, sweet sorghum could be used to
produce ethanol in the Southern U.S and other tropical and subtropical environments.
Traditionally, sweet sorghum has been grown as a pureline cultivar. However,
these cultivars produce low quantities of seed and are often too tall for efficient
mechanical harvest. Sweet sorghum hybrids that use grain-type seed parents with high sugar concentrations are one way to overcome limitation to seed supply and to capture
the benefits of heterosis.
There are four objectives of this research. First to evaluate the importance of
genotype, environment, and genotype-by-environment interaction effects on the sweet
sorghum yield and composition. The second objective is to determine the presence and
magnitude of heterosis effects for traits related to sugar production in sweet sorghum.
Next: to study the ability of sweet sorghum hybrids and cultivars to produce a ratoon
crop and determine the contribution of ratoon crops to total sugar yield. The final
objective is to evaluate variation in composition of sweet sorghum juice and biomass.
Sweet sorghum hybrids, grain-type sweet seed parents, and traditional cultivars
that served as male parents were evaluated in multi-environment trials in Weslaco,
College Station, and Halfway, Texas in 2007 and 2008. Both genotype and environment
influenced performance, but environment had a greater effect than genotype on the
composition of sweet sorghum juice and biomass yield. In comparing performance, elite
hybrids produced fresh biomass and sugar yields similar to the traditional cultivars while
overcoming the seed production limitations. High parent heterosis was expressed among
the experimental hybrids for biomass yield, sugar yield and sugar concentration.
Additional selection for combining ability would further enhance yields and heterosis in
the same hybrid. Little variation was observed among hybrids for juice and biomass
composition suggesting that breeding efforts should focus on yield before altering plant
composition.
|
8 |
Assessing Maturity in Sweet Sorghum Hybrids and its Role in Daily Biomass SupplyBurks, Payne 2012 May 1900 (has links)
Sweet sorghum is a highly versatile C4 grass noted for its improved drought tolerance and water use efficiency relative to sugarcane. Sweet sorghum is well suited for ethanol production due to a rapid growth rate, high biomass production, and a wide range of adaptation. Unlike the 12-18 month growth cycle of sugarcane, sweet sorghum produces a harvestable crop in three to five months. Sweet sorghum and sugarcane crops are complementary and in combination can extend the sugar mill seasons in many regions of the world to an estimated 8 months. Seasonal growth and weather patterns both optimize and restrict production of each crop to specific times of the year, however these are different for the two crops. In addition to temporally spacing the date of harvest between crops, the genetic variability of maturity within the crops may also be used to extend the mill seasons; specific hybrids can be used and selected to maximize yield throughout the harvest season.
Under favorable growing environments, sweet sorghum hybrids of all maturity groups produced sugar yields ranging from 2.8 to 4.9 MT/ha. Early/medium, late, and very late maturity hybrids planted during April, May, and June planting dates are necessary to maximize the mill season. In this study, early/medium maturity hybrids planted during April and May matured for harvest between late July and mid-August. June planting dates were unfavorable for early/medium maturity hybrids. In addition, late and very late maturity hybrids planted during April matured for harvest in late August; the additional growing season thus resulted in higher sugar yields. Timely planting of late and very late maturity hybrids in April, May, and June produce the maximum yields for harvests after mid August. Intermittent use of late and very late maturity hybrids can therefore extend sugar milling seasons into mid November if so desired.
|
9 |
EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT PRETREATMENT APPROACHES FOR DISRUPTING LIGNOCELLULOSIC STRUCTURESSiddaramu, Thara Gejjalagere 01 August 2011 (has links)
AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Thara G. Siddaramu, for the Master of Science degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering, presented on February 5, 2011, at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. TITLE: EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT PRETREATMENT APPROACHES FOR DISRUPTING LIGNOCELLULOSIC STRUCTURES MAJOR PROFESSOR: Dr. Yanna Liang There are two major steps in biofuel production- pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials and enzymatic hydrolysis. The present study investigated the ability of two pretreatment methods, namely traditional oven and microwave oven treatments for disrupting lignocellulosic structures. The substrates tested were Jatropha seed cake and sweet sorghum bagasse. In recent years, Jatropha curcas also known as physic nut or purging nut has attracted extensive attention due to its several unique characteristics. Similarly, sweet sorghum has the potential to provide great value to energy sectors and food industries being that the entire plant is rich in various sugars and nutrients. Both crops can adapt to various climates, and can withstand extended drought conditions compared to other crops. Additionally, both Jatropha seed cakes and sweet sorghum bagasse are good sources of lignin and carbohydrates, which could be used for production of biofuels only if the sugars can be unlocked. Several treatment methods such as mechanical, physical, chemical and biological treatments have been reported to breakdown the cellulosic structure of biomass. However, other low cost and quicker methods, such as ovenpretreatment and microwave irradiation have not been evaluated for Jatropha seed cake and Sweet Sorghum Bagasse (SSB), respectively. Composition change of Jatropha seed cake samples was evaluated upon lime pretreatment at 100 oC with different parameters. With a lime dose of 0.2 g and a water content of 10 ml per gram of cake and a treatment period of 1 h, 38.2 ± 0.6% of lignin was removed. However, 65 ± 16% of hemicellulose was also lost under this condition. For all the treatments tested, cellulose content was not affected by lime supplementation. Through further examining total reducing sugar (TRS) release by enzymatic hydrolysis after lime pretreatment, results indicated that 0.1 g of lime and 9 ml of water per gram of cake and 3 h pretreatment produced the maximal 68.9% conversion of cellulose. Without lime pretreatment, the highest cellulose conversion was 33.3%. Finally, this study shows that Jatropha seed cake samples could be hydrolyzed by enzymes. Even though the cellulose content was not high for this Jatropha cake sample, the fractionation by lime presented in this study opened the door for other applications, such as removal of lignin and toxicity for use as animal feed and fertilizer. The microwave radiation pretreatment of SSB was evaluated with or without lime (0.1 g/g bagasse) at 10 ml water/g bagasse for 4 min. TRS release over 72-h enzymatic hydrolysis was different for samples treated differently and at different solid loadings. The TRS concentration was increased by 2 and 5-fold from 0 to 24 hours in non lime-pretreated and lime-pretreated samples, respectively. Further incubation of samples for 48 and 72 h did not result in increased TRS. Comparing different solid loadings of samples treated with or without lime, 1% solid content resulted in 1.4 times higher TRS increase than that of 5% solid concentration. Therefore, lime was effective in disintegrating lignocellulosic structures and making cellulose more accessible for saccharification. Higher solid loadings which can lead to higher sugar concentrations are desired for downstream biofuel production. But, as shown in this study, higher concentration of bagasse samples decreased rate of cellulose hydrolysis due to poorer mixing efficiency and hindrance to interactions between enzymes and solid materials. Thus, an optimal solid content needs to be determined for maximal cellulose hydrolysis and for preparing the hydrolysates for downstream processes, either bioethanol or lipid production.
|
10 |
PRETREATMENT OF SWEET SORGHUM BAGASSE TO IMPROVE ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS FOR BIOFUEL PRODUCTIONLoku Umagiliyage, Arosha 01 August 2013 (has links)
With recent emphasis on development of alternatives to fossil fuels, sincere attempts are being made on finding suitable lignocellulosic feedstocks for biochemical conversion to fuels and chemicals. Sweet Sorghum is among the most widely adaptable cereal grasses, with high drought resistance, and ability to grow on low quality soils with low inputs. It is a C4 crop with high photosynthetic efficiency and biomass yield. Since sweet sorghum has many desirable traits, it has been considered as an attractive feedstock. Large scale sweet sorghum juice extraction results in excessive amounts of waste sweet sorghum bagasse (SSB), which is a promising low cost lignocellusic feed stock. The ability of two pretreatment methods namely conventional oven and microwave oven pretreatment for disrupting lignocellulosic structures of sweet sorghum bagasse with lime [Ca(OH)2] and sodium hydroxide [NaOH] was evaluated. The primary goal of this study was to determine optimal alkali pretreatment conditions to obtain higher biomass conversion (TRS yield) while achieving higher lignin reduction for biofuel production. The prime objective was achieved using central composite design (CCD) and optimization of biomass conversion and lignin removal simultaneously for each alkali separately by response surface method (RSM). Quadratic models were used to define the conditions that separately and simultaneously maximize the response variables. The SSB used in this study was composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin in the percentage of 36.9 + 1.6, 17.8 + 0.6, and 19.5 + 1.1, respectively. The optimal conditions for lime pretreatment in the conventional oven at 100 °C was 1.7 (% w/v) lime concentration (=0.0024 molL-1), 6.0% (w/v) SSB loading, 2.4 hr pretreatment time with predicted yields of 85.6% total biomass conversion and 35.5% lignin reduction. For NaOH pretreatment, 2% (w/v) alkali (=0.005 molL-1), 6.8% SSB loading and 2.3 hr duration was the optimal level with predicted biomass conversion and lignin reduction of 92.9% and 50.0%, respectively. More intensive pretreatment conditions removed higher amount of hemicelluloses and cellulose. Microwave based pretreatments were carried out in a CEM laboratory microwave oven (MARS 6-Xpress Microwave Reactions System, CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC) and with varying alkali concentration(0.3 - 3.7 % w/v) at varying temperatures (106.4 - 173.6 °C), and length of time (6.6 - 23.4 min). The NaOH pretreatment was optimized at 1.8 (% w/v) NaOH, 143 °C, 14 min time with predicted yields of 85.8% total biomass conversion and 78.7% lignin reduction. For lime pretreatment, 3.1% (w/v) lime, 138 °C and 17.5 min duration was the optimal level with predicted biomass conversion and lignin reduction of 79.9% and 61.1%, respectively. Results from this study were further supported by FTIR spectral interpretation and SEM images.
|
Page generated in 0.0471 seconds