• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 4
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

TBX2 IS INVOLVED IN MYOGENESIS AND ITS DEREGULATION PROMOTES TUMORIGENESIS IN RHABDOMYOSARCOMA

ZHU, BO 01 May 2015 (has links)
TBX2, a member of the T-box family of transcription factors, plays important roles in embryonic development. Aberrant expression of TBX2 is observed in many cancers, and serves as an oncogene to maintain tumor cell proliferative and malignant properties. We found that TBX2 was expressed in both embryonic myoblasts and adult proliferative satellite cells, but was quickly down regulated during muscle differentiation in mouse models, which suggests an important function of TBX2 in the early myogenesis. Using molecular and cellular biology approaches we showed that TBX2 forms complex with myogenin and MyoD, and then recruits HDAC1 to muscle-specific promoters to repress the myogenin and MyoD dependent differentiation of myoblasts. In rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), which is typically referred to as a muscle derived cancer, we found TBX2 was over expressed in both major subtypes of RMS. The deregulated TBX2 repressed the expression of cell cycle regulators, such as p21 and p14/p19, and the tumor suppressor PTEN in RMS tumor cells. Knock down of TBX2 significantly decreased the proliferation rate of RMS cells. We also found that loss of TBX2 significantly inhibited tumorigenesis of RMS cells by decreasing cell proliferation, mobility, migration, anchorage-independent growth and xenograft formation. To determine why TBX2 was deregulated in RMS cells, we performed cellular biological experiments to understand how TBX2 is regulated by cell signaling pathways and growth factors in both normal muscle myoblasts and RMS tumor cells. In normal murine myoblasts and primary murine ARMS tumor cells TBX2 was up regulated by FGF-2 treatment, but in primary murine ERMS cells TBX2 expression showed no response to FGF-2 stimulation. In human RMS cell lines a modest up regulation of TBX2 was detected by treatment of FGF-2. RMS cells constitutively express PAX3 and PAX7 which are expressed and function in myogenic precursors, but are quickly degraded in myoblasts and during myogenesis. We found that TBX2 was a downstream target of PAX3 in RMS cells, as well as the ARMS specific fusion proteins PAX3/7-FOXO1. Our novel findings on TBX2 highlight the significant roles of TBX2 in muscle development and adult muscle regeneration, where TBX2 represses MRF activities to inhibit myogenic differentiation and promote proliferation of myoblasts. Also, our work establishes essential oncogene effects of TBX2 in driving and maintaining RMS proliferation and tumorigenesis by repressing cell cycle regulatory factors, p21 and p19/p14, and tumor suppressor of PTEN. Therefore, this work provides an exciting opportunity for development of new therapeutic treatments for TBX2 driven RMS cancer.
2

EARLY GROWTH RESPONSE 1 (EGR1) AS A TUMOR SUPPRESSOR AND APOPTOSIS INDUCER IN RHABDOMYOSARCOMA

Mohamad, Trefa Salih 01 May 2017 (has links)
EGR1, one of the immediate-early response genes, plays an important role as a mediator for transmitting extracellular stimuli. EGR1 is down regulated in many cancers. Many studies show that it functions as a tumor suppressor gene in a variety of cancers. EGR1 also acts as an oncogene in number of cancers. We found that in rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), which is a muscle derived pediatric cancer, EGR1 was expressed in both RMS subtypes, embryonal and alveolar, but with a much higher expression profile in embryonal RMS. This suggests different mechanisms of down regulation of EGR1 in these two subtypes. Molecular and cellular approaches were used to characterize the functional role of EGR1 in RMS. We found that over expression of EGR1 in alveolar RMS significantly decreased cell proliferation, mobility, and anchorage-independent growth. We showed that exogenous EGR1 up regulated the cell cycle regulator, p21, which is normally repressed in RMS. EGR1 also promoted differentiation in RMS cells by up regulating several genes involved in muscle differentiation including myosin heavy chain (MyHC), MyoD and myogenin. We found that EGR1 interacts with the oncogene TBX2 in RMS cells and that TBX2 inhibits EGR1 function. To understand how TBX2 inhibits EGR1, we depleted TBX2 in RMS and we found an up regulation of the EGR1 targeted tumor suppressor gene, PTEN, and the cysteine protease inhibitor gene, CST6. Also, we performed luciferase assays and found that TBX2 decreased the expression of luciferase constructs fused with the PTEN promoter when TBX2 was co-transfected with EGR1. Our novel findings on the EGR1 function in RMS highlights the significant role of EGR1 in muscle development and tumor growth. Significantly, our work also suggests the EGR1 could promote tumor regression in RMS through inducing programmed cell death, or apoptosis. We found that EGR1 induced apoptosis through triggering the intrinsic apoptosis pathway and activating caspase cascades involving caspase 3 and caspase 9, which are essential mitochondrial apoptotic factors. Also, we observed the activation of two pro-apoptotic factors, BAX and dephosphorylated BAD, which are both located upstream of the caspase cascades in the intrinsic pathway. Also, we found in our study that EGR1 is repressed by the catalytic subunit of PRC2 complex, EZH2, which mediates gene silencing through methylation of lysine 27 on histone 3 (H3K27me3). EGR1 also sensitized RMS cells to chemotherapeutic agents, which could be a future direction for improved therapeutic targeting. Therefore, this work provides a novel and powerful molecular therapeutic target for RMS cancer.
3

TBX2 IS REPRESSED BY TBX3 AND TBX3 IS TARGETED BY PRC2 IN RHABDOMYOSARCOMA

Oh, Teak-Jung 01 August 2018 (has links)
TBX2 and TBX3, which function as repressors, are members of the T-Box transcription factor family which are conserved throughout the metazoan lineage. TBX2 is highly expressed in rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children, and many other cancers. Previously, our lab dissected the oncogenic properties of TBX2 and its regulation of p14, p21 and PTEN. TBX3 is also expressed in some cancer types, however, its expression profile in RMS is severely down-regulated. TBX3 is shown to repress TBX2 in chondrocytes, but the characterization and regulation of TBX3 is poorly understood in the muscle lineage. Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2), a gene silencing complex, acts to methylate histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me) of target gene promoters. The catalytic subunit of PRC2, EZH2, is up-regulated in RMS and data from our lab has shown that depletion of EZH2 up-regulated TBX3 and down-regulated TBX2 in C2C12 cells, an immortalized murine cell line. The hypothesis of this project was that there would be a PRC2-TBX3-TBX2 axis in RMS cells. To examine if TBX3 represses TBX2, TBX3 was transiently expressed in RMS cells representing both subtypes of RMS and we found that TBX2 was downregulated in each cell line. In a stable RH30 cell line with ectopic TBX3, TBX2 was down-regulated and PTEN expression was up-regulated. To determine if TBX2 repression by TBX3 was direct, a TBX3 ChIP assay was performed on the TBX2 promoter as well as the PTEN promoter. We found a strong enrichment of TBX3 on the TBX2 promoter but not on the PTEN promoter. Accordingly, we also observed that TBX3 over-expression impaired tumorigenesis through reduced cell proliferation, migration, and anchorage dependent growth. Also, we found that a stable RD cell line with ectopic TBX3 could promote differentiation, strongly suggesting that these results could have therapeutic value. Next, a shEZH2 plasmid was transfected into RMS cell lines ask if TBX3 was regulated by the PRC2 complex as we had observed in C2C12 cells. Just as we hypothesized, TBX3 was up-regulated and TBX2 was down-regulated. Similar to the previous TBX3 overexpression experiments, the EZH2 depleted RMS cell lines also showed decreased cell proliferation and migration rate. Also, an EZH2 knock down treatment induced differentiation in RMS cell lines. Therefore, understanding this potent regulation axis could provide an excellent opportunity for treatment of RMS cancer in the future.
4

Régulation de l'expression des oncogènes du papillomavirus humain de type 16 : étude dans des lignées cellulaires de cancers du col de l'utérus traitées avec un agent déméthylant / Oncogene expression regulation of human papillomavirus type 16 : study in cell lines of cervical cancers with a demethylating agent

Perrard, Jérôme 20 May 2019 (has links)
Les papillomavirus humains (HPV) sont des petits virus non enveloppés à ADN double brin, qui infectent les épithéliums cutanés et muqueux. Très largement répandus dans la population humaine, les infections sont la plupart du temps asymptomatiques, tandis qu'une minorité provoquent des verrues cutanées, des condylomes acuminés et des carcinomes. Les cancers induits par HPV représentent 640 000 cas en 2012 dans le monde et sont localisés au niveau anogénital et au niveau des voies aérodigestives supérieures.La transformation des cellules est induite en particulier par la surexpression de deux oncoprotéines virales : E6 et E7, qui sont nécessaires à l'initiation, la promotion et la progression du phénotype cancéreux. Leur extinction provoque d'ailleurs la mort des cellules cancéreuses. E6 et E7 favorisent par exemple la dégradation de p53 et pRb, induisant ainsi une prolifération non contrôlée et accrue des cellules infectées. Mais les deux oncoprotéines virales interagissent aussi avec plus de 150 partenaires protéiques et dérégulent l'homéostasie cellulaire. Fait intéressant, E6 et E7 modulent l'expression de nombreuses protéines impliquées dans l'établissement des marques épigénétiques, impliquées dans la régulation de l'expression des gènes. D'ailleurs, la surexpression des oncoprotéines virales peut être liée à la méthylation de l'ADN d'une partie du génome viral.Puisque E6 et E7 détournent la machinerie épigénétique de la cellule, l'objectif du travail de thèse a été d'étudier les mécanismes moléculaires régulant l'expression des oncoprotéines lors du traitement des cellules de cancers du col par un agent déméthylant de l'ADN, le 5-aza-2'-déoxycytidine (5azadC).Dans des cellules issues de cancers du col de l'utérus, nous avons observé qu'un traitement déméthylant induisait une répression de la protéine E6 et une déstabilisation de ses transcrits, suggérant l'implication d'un miARN. Parmi les miARN ciblant les transcrits viraux, le miR-375 était le plus susceptible d'être impliqué dans la déstabilisation des transcrits car (i) la méthylation de son promoteur augmente avec la gravité des lésions du col de l'utérus, (ii) il cible les transcrits viraux au niveau de cinq régions différentes, et (iii) son expression est augmentée lors du traitement de cellules dérivées du cancer du col de l'utérus avec le 5azadC. Il s'est avéré que le miR-375 était effectivement impliqué dans la répression partielle des transcrits viraux lors du traitement. Les résultats de cette étude suggèrent par ailleurs qu'un autre mécanisme moléculaire pourrait être impliqué dans cette répression. C'est pourquoi, dans un deuxième temps, nous avons étudié l'implication possible d'un facteur de transcription, TBX2, dans la répression des transcrits viraux. Bien que le taux transcriptionnel de TBX2 soit augmenté lors du traitement des cellules avec des fortes concentrations de 5azadC, nos résultats suggèrent que la protéine n'est pas exprimée dans les cellules, même après traitement, et que TBX2 ne régule pas l'activité du promoteur viral intégré au génome cellulaire.Le traitement des cellules par l'agent déméthylant entraîne aussi une perte de viabilité en particulier des cellules Ca Ski. En effet, le 5azadC induit un blocage du cycle en G2/M dans ces cellules, une augmentation du pourcentage de cellules en Sub-G1 et un clivage de la PARP. Si le 5azadC est déjà utilisé en clinique pour le traitement d'autres cancers, nos données apportent un éclairage nouveau sur les mécanismes moléculaires du 5azadC dans les cancers induits par HPV, qui pourraient ainsi être traités par cette molécule. / Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are small, non-enveloped double-stranded DNA viruses and infect cutaneous and mucosal epithelia. Highly widespread in the human population, infections are mostly asymptomatic, while a minority causes cutaneous and genital warts, and carcinomas. HPV-induced cancers represent 640 000 cases in 2012 worldwide and are localized at the anogenital and head and neck sites.Cell transformation is induced by the overexpression of two viral oncoproteins E6 and E7, which are necessary for the initiation, promotion and progression of the cancerous phenotype. Indeed, their extinction causes cancer cell death. E6 and E7, for example, promote the degradation of p53 and pRb, thus inducing uncontrolled and increased proliferation of infected cells. But the two viral oncoproteins also interact with more than 150 protein partners and deregulate cell homeostasis. Interestingly, E6 and E7 modulate the expression of many proteins involved in the establishment of epigenetic marks, regulating gene expression. Furthermore, the overexpression of viral oncoproteins may be related to viral genome DNA methylation.Since E6 and E7 hijack epigenetic mechanisms, the aim of the thesis was to study the molecular mechanisms regulating the oncoprotein expression during the treatment of cervical cancer cells by a DNA demethylating agent, the 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5azadC).In cervical cancer cells, we observed that a demethylating treatment induced E6 protein repression and destabilization of its transcripts, suggesting the involvement of a miRNA. Among miRNAs targeting viral transcripts, miR-375 was most likely to be involved this destabilization because (i) its promoter methylation increases with the severity of cervical lesions, (ii) it targets viral transcripts at five different regions, and (iii) its expression is increased in cervical cancer cells treated with 5azadC. In our experiences, miR-375 was indeed involved in the partial repression of viral transcripts during treatment. The results of this study further suggest that another molecular mechanism might be implicated in this repression. This is why, in a second step, we studied the possible involvement of a transcription factor, TBX2, in the viral transcript repression. Although the transcriptional rate of TBX2 is increased in cells treated with high concentrations of 5azadC, our results suggest that the protein is not expressed in cells, even after treatment, and that TBX2 does not regulate the viral promoter activity integrated into the cellular genome.Cell treatment with demethylating agent also leads to loss of viability, in particular in Ca Ski cells. Indeed, 5azadC induces a G2/M cycle arrest in these cells, an increase of Sub-G1 cells percentage and a PARP cleavage. While 5azadC is already used in clinical practice for the treatment of other cancers, our data shed new light on the molecular mechanisms of 5azadC in cancers induced by HPV, which could be treated by this molecule or analogues.

Page generated in 0.0183 seconds