Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2016-07-04T19:34:40Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DIS_GRAZIELA_MARIA_WOLFART_COMPLETO.pdf: 1171325 bytes, checksum: 43d72b9a8b4367f364b3763fcbe7f65d (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-04T19:34:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DIS_GRAZIELA_MARIA_WOLFART_COMPLETO.pdf: 1171325 bytes, checksum: 43d72b9a8b4367f364b3763fcbe7f65d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-18 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / This research tries to offer a contribution to the debate about the mystery of the evil, considering the contradiction between the goodness of the divine creation and the presence of the evil in the world. Aware that we cannot find a final answer to that question, that since the beginning of the times plagues the humanity, we propose a debate starting of the relation between Cinema and Theology. Therefore, will be used as a resource the query of two movies and two theological excerpts that can contribute to this debate. The chosen films are ?Melancholia? and ?Antichrist?, of Lars Von Trier. Under the theological point of view, will seek inspiration in the final phrase of the Our Father (prayer): ?deliver us from evil?; and in the stretch of the Saint Paul?s Letter to the Romans (Rm 7,19): ?For I do not do the good I want, but the evil I do not want is what I keep on doing.?. / A presente pesquisa busca oferecer uma contribui??o ? reflex?o sobre o mist?rio do mal, considerando a contradi??o entre a bondade da cria??o divina e a presen?a do mal no mundo. Cientes de que n?o encontraremos resposta definitiva a esta quest?o que desde o in?cio dos tempos assola a humanidade, propomos um debate a partir da rela??o entre Cinema e Teologia. Para tanto, ser?o utilizados como recurso a consulta a dois filmes e a dois excertos teol?gicos que podem contribuir para tal reflex?o. Os filmes escolhidos s?o ?Melancolia? e ?Anticristo?, de Lars Von Trier. Sob o vi?s da Teologia, se buscar? inspira??o na frase final da ora??o do Pai Nosso: ?livrai-nos do mal?; e no trecho da Carta de S?o Paulo aos Romanos (Rm 7,19): ?Porque n?o fa?o o bem que quero, mas o mal que n?o quero, esse fa?o?.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:12:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 EdrisiAF_TESE.pdf: 2696449 bytes, checksum: 2bf551b579d0227160e510a27e887618 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010-06-14 / This thesis aims better understanding the relation between time and evil in Schelling s Freiheitsschrift, having its starting point in approximations from Gnosticism. For that purpose, before approaching that relation, it is reviewed (chapter I) the question of Gnosticism, a strain of thought essentially concerned with the problem of time and permeated by the belief in an evil nature of creation, and which is alleged to have significantly influenced certain ideas of Schelling. An evaluation of approximations between Gnosticism, gnosis and German thought follows (chapter II), as well as an evaluation of Schellingian aproximations to Gnosticism (chapter III). Then, the Freiheitsschrift is analysed as the text where Schelling, having taken hold of a very distinct appropriation of Gnosticism, goes beyond Kantian theodicy (chapter IV). Some interrogations about whether key ideas of Schellingian philosophy (about gnosis, creation, duality, time, and evil) are conceived in a way that is essentially different from that of historic Gnosticism, despite the much that has been said to the contrary, are then addressed (chapter V). The proposal of a Platonic-Plotinian key to the understanding of the relations between time and evil in the Freiheitsschrift comes next (chapter VI), and then gives way to the concluding remarks (chapter VII). We perceive that Gnosticism and Neoplatonism are systems of thought that sometimes converge, and that German thought is one of the places of this convergence. Notwithstanding this perception, it is possible to affirm that Schellingian thought, with its valorization of time and of a certain perception of evil, is essentially anti-gnostic, despite some contrary observations / Esta tese objetiva contribuir para um melhor entendimento da rela??o entre o tempo e o mal no Freiheitsschrift de Schelling, a partir de aproxima??es desde o Gnosticismo. Para tanto, antes de come?ar a tratar dessa rela??o far-se-? uma revis?o da quest?o do Gnosticismo (cap?tulo I) corrente de pensamento essencialmente preocupada com a problem?tica do tempo e permeada pela cren?a em uma natureza m? da cria??o, e que alegadamente teria influenciado de modo significativo algumas ideias de Schelling. Seguir-se-? uma avalia??o das aproxima??es entre Gnosticismo, gnose e pensamento alem?o (cap?tulo II) e outra particularmente dedicada ?s aproxima??es schellinguianas ao Gnosticismo (cap?tulo III). Analisar-se-? ent?o o Freiheitsschrift como texto onde Schelling, tendo feito uma apropria??o muito particular do Gnosticismo, vai al?m da teodic?ia kantiana (cap?tulo IV). Interrogar-se ? ent?o (cap?tulo V) se algumas ideiaschave da filosofia schellinguiana (sobre a gnose, a cria??o, a dualidade, o tempo, o mal) s?o concebidas de um modo essencialmente distinto daquele do Gnosticismo hist?rico, apesar do muito que se disse em contr?rio. Apresentar-se-? em seguida a proposta de uma chave Plat?nica-plotiniana para o entendimento das rela??es entre o tempo e o mal no Freiheitsschrift (cap?tulo VI), passando-se logo em seguida ?s considera??es conclusivas (cap?tulo VII). Constata-se que o Gnosticismo e o Neoplatonismo constituem sistemas por vezes convergentes entre si, e que o pensamento alem?o ? um dos espa?os dessa converg?ncia. N?o obstante essa constata??o, ? poss?vel afirmar que o pensamento schellinguiano, com sua valoriza??o do tempo e de uma certa percep??o do mal, ? essencialmente antign?stico, a despeito de algumas observa??es em contr?rio