Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-15T19:34:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Caio Amuri Varga.pdf: 1399912 bytes, checksum: 72a9a9eea2cbc14a91cfb937971007ca (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-08-06 / This paper is tied to the line of research Citizenship Shaping the State of the lato sensu post-graduate program of the Law School of the Mackenzie Presbyterian University and was developed with the specific purpose of demonstrating the impact of tax enforcement actions on the slow-paced Brazilian Judiciary and, from that reality, present the possibility of reducing the litigiousness concerning such claims through the dejudicialization of some procedural acts related thereto. The monograph was divided into an introductory text, five development chapters with brief and specific conclusions to each of them, and a general conclusion at the end. In the first of such chapters, a historical analysis is made of the sluggishness of the Brazilian Judiciary and of the several attempts to fight it through changes of the procedural rules. The second chapter addresses how the Government operates in Court Cases and the causes leading it to be the largest litigator in Brazil. The third chapter is dedicated to specifically demonstrate the impact of tax enforcement actions on clogging the Judiciary and the consequences of the total lack of efficiency of the current model. The fourth chapter shows some already existing cases of dejudicialization of claims involving the Government. Lastly, the fifth and last chapter demonstrates the possibility of dejudicialization, at least partly, of the procedures related to tax enforcement actions that are currently exclusively conducted by the Judiciary. / O presente trabalho está vinculado à linha de pesquisa Cidadania Modelando o Estado, do programa de pós graduação lato sensu da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie. Ele foi desenvolvido com o escopo específico de demonstrar o impacto das execuções fiscais de natureza tributária na morosidade do Poder Judiciário brasileiro e, a partir de tal realidade, apresentar a possibilidade de diminuir a litigiosidade relativa a tais demandas por meio da desjudicialização de alguns dos atos processuais a elas relacionados. A monografia foi dividida em um texto introdutório, cinco seções de desenvolvimento com breves conclusões específicas para cada um deles e uma conclusão geral ao final. Na primeira dessas seções de desenvolvimento faz-se a análise histórica do problema da morosidade do Poder Judiciário brasileiro e das diversas tentativas de combatê-la a partir de alterações nas normas processuais. A segunda aborda a forma de atuação da Administração Pública em Juízo e as causas que a levam a ser a maior litigante brasileira. A terceira dedica-se a demonstrar de forma específica o impacto das execuções fiscais no congestionamento do Poder Judiciário e as consequências da completa ineficiência do modelo atual. Na quarta são demonstradas algumas hipóteses já existentes de desjudicialização das demandas envolvendo o Poder Público. Por fim, na quinta e última seção de desenvolvimento, demonstra-se a possibilidade de se desjudicializar ao menos parte dos procedimentos relacionados às execuções fiscais que atualmente são conduzidos exclusivamente pelo Poder Judiciário.

Pretende-se com o presente trabalho de pesquisa abordar, do ponto de vista teórico, as especificidades da execução ex officio das contribuições sociais no âmbito trabalhista. A problemática gira em torno da natureza jurídica da contribuição social e do procedimento sui generis de execução na justiça do trabalho. A natureza tributária impõe uma série de implicações que devem ser enfrentadas pelo operador do direito, principalmente no que pertine as normas aplicáveis na constituição e exigência do crédito tributário. O objeto do trabalho consistirá na análise do procedimento de execução que deve ser adotado, visando o respeito dos demais institutos vinculados à execução tributária, inclusive, a prescrição e a decadência. Serão identificadas as peculiaridades desta competência concorrente, incluída a questão da possibilidade de utilização de períodos cujo vínculo tenha sido reconhecido por sentença trabalhista, para fins de obtenção de benefícios previdenciários. / The present research intends to approach, from a theoretical point of view, the specific ex officio implementation of social security contributions. The issue revolves around the legal nature of social security contribution and the sui generis execution procedure in the labour courts. The nature of this tax (contribution to social security) imposes a number of implications that must be addressed by the legal practitioner, especially as it pertains to the rules in the constitution and requirements of taxes owning. The objective of the study will be the analysis of the execution procedure to be adopted for compliance with other laws, rules, or regulations relating to tax enforcement, including any statutes of limitation. The peculiarities of this concurrent jurisdiction will be identified, including the question of whether retroactive decisions of labor tribunals can be used to obtain social security benefits.

Most research on tax evasion has focused on the income tax. Sales tax evasion has been largely ignored and dismissed as immaterial. This paper explored the differences between income tax and sales tax evasion and demonstrated that sales tax enforcement is deserving of and requires the use of different tools to achieve compliance. Specifically, the major enforcement problem with sales tax is not evasion: it is theft perpetrated by companies that act as collection agents for the state. Companies engage in a principal-agent relationship with the state and many retain funds collected as an agent of the state for private use. As such, the act of sales tax theft bears more resemblance to embezzlement than to income tax evasion. It has long been assumed that the sales tax is nearly evasion free, and state revenue departments report voluntary compliance in a manner that perpetuates this myth. Current sales tax compliance enforcement methodologies are similar in form to income tax compliance enforcement methodologies and are based largely on trust. The primary focus is on delinquent filers with a very small percentage of businesses subject to audit. As a result, there is a very large group of noncompliant businesses who file on time and fly below the radar while stealing millions of taxpayer dollars. The author utilized a variety of statistical methods with actual field data derived from operations of the Southern Region Criminal Investigations Unit of the Florida Department of Revenue to evaluate current and proposed sales tax compliance enforcement methodologies in a quasi-experimental, time series research design and to set forth a typology of sales tax evaders. This study showed that current estimates of voluntary compliance in sales tax systems are seriously and significantly overstated and that current enforcement methodologies are inadequate to identify the majority of violators and enforce compliance. Sales tax evasion is modeled using the theory of planned behavior and Cressey’s fraud triangle and it is demonstrated that proactive enforcement activities, characterized by substantial contact with non-delinquent taxpayers, results in superior ability to identify noncompliance and provides a structure through which noncompliant businesses can be rehabilitated.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:22:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Luis Carlos A Mercon de Vargas.pdf: 2709564 bytes, checksum: 077ce454fba7c6f8a71bcc3e3e60cb27 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-10-30 / This study aims to analyze the suspension of tax enforcement, discussed from a normative perspective. The method employed is the analytical-hermeneutics method, based on the premise that the law is constituted by language. For this reason, the work involves a syntactic, semantic and pragmatic analysis. The purpose is to comprehend the suspension of tax enforcement as a normative conditional proposition (i.e, as a formal structure). The antecedents of this proposition are the hypotheses listed in article 151, of the Brazilian Tax Code, and the consequent is the prohibition for the Tax Authority to collect tax credits. Furthermore, the paper also discusses the suspension norm s interactions among the other norms in the legal system, and how the sign-using agents of law deal with it. The work takes into consideration the complete formal structure of the legal norm (i.e., primary and secondary norms) / Esta pesquisa tem por objeto a suspensão da exigibilidade do crédito tributário. Investiga-se o fenômeno do ponto de vista normativo, utilizando-se do método analítico-hermenêutico, e partindo da premissa que o direito é constituído por linguagem. Por conta disso o estudo passa por uma análise sintática, semântica e pragmática. O objetivo é compreender a norma de suspensão como juízo hipotético condicional, em que o antecedente é umas das hipóteses previstas no art. 151, do CTN, e o consequente representa a proibição de que o sujeito ativo exerça a cobrança do crédito tributário perante o sujeito passivo. Além disso, também é estudado como essa norma interage com as demais no sistema, bem como os utentes da linguagem jurídica lidam com ela. Toda essa análise é feita levando em consideração a estrutura completa da norma jurídica (norma primária e norma secundária)