published_or_final_version / Education / Master / Master of Education

published_or_final_version / Education / Master / Master of Education

The purpose of this multi-case study was to identify the influence of professional development experiences on the changing reading practices of third-grade teachers in low-performing schools. Schools were chosen to participate based upon a steady increase in reading achievement scores despite failing to meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and being placed within the Corrective Action Phase of No Child Left Behind. Six teachers from 4 schools were chosen as participants based on the changing reading practices they reported on an initial survey of 13 teachers. Interviews, observations, focus groups, and collection of archival data was completed over the course of 5 months in order to determine the influence of professional development on their reading practices. It was determined that teacher change following professional development is heavily influenced by the domain of power the directive or development is coming from. A continuum was developed to illustrate the relationship between these varying domains of power and their influence on changes made within reading practice. The changes were categorized as tending toward self-propelled or compelled changes. Teachers within this study reported higher levels of change when they were personally vested in professional development experiences and when those experiences met the immediate needs of their own personal growth or the growth of the students in their classroom. / by Michelle Vaughan. / Thesis (Ed.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2009. / Includes bibliography. / Electronic reproduction. Boca Raton, Fla., 2009. Mode of access: World Wide Web.

This study characterizes the mathematical knowledge upon which secondary school algebra teachers draw when pondering problem situations that could arise in the teaching and learning of solving algebraic equations, as well as examines the potential connections between teachers' knowledge and their academic backgrounds and teaching experiences. Seventy-two middle school and high school algebra teachers in Texas participated in the study by completing an academic background questionnaire and a written-response assessment instrument. Eight participants were then invited for followup semi-structured interviews. The results revealed three topic areas in equation solving in which teachers' mathematical subject matter understanding should be strengthened: (a) the balancing method, (b) the concept of equivalent equations, and (c) the properties of linear equations in their general forms. The participants provided a wide range of instances of student misconceptions and difficulties in learning how to solve linear and quadratic equations, as well as a variety of strategies for helping students to improve their understanding. Teachers' subject matter knowledge played a central or prerequisite role in their reasoning and decision-making in specific contexts. When the problem contexts became broader or more general, teachers drew from across the three basic domains of mathematical knowledge for teaching (knowledge of the mathematical subject matter, knowledge of learners' conceptions, and knowledge of didactic representations) and showed individual preferences. Overall, teachers tended to rely more heavily upon their knowledge of students' specific or general learning characteristics. Statistical analyses suggest that teachers who majored in mathematics and who had the most experience in teaching first-year or more advanced algebra courses performed significantly higher on the assessment than their counterparts, and there is a linear relationship between teachers' performance and the number of advanced mathematics course they have taken. Neither course-taking in mathematics education nor number of years of algebra teaching made a significant difference in their performance. Results are either unclear or inconsistent about the role of teachers' (a) use of algebra textbooks, (b) prior experience with a method or a manipulative, and (c) participation in professional development activities. Teachers also rated (a) collaborating with and learning from colleagues and (b) dealing with student conceptions and questions as highly influential on their professional knowledge growth.

published_or_final_version / Education / Master / Master of Education

published_or_final_version / Education / Master / Master of Education

published_or_final_version / Education / Master / Master of Education

published_or_final_version / Education / Master / Master of Education

published_or_final_version / abstract / toc / Education / Master / Master of Education

This study investigates how school advisors, in a secondary-school science context, conceive of and enact their roles in working with student teachers. It describes the interactions between school advisors and student teachers in relation to their personal conceptions of teaching, learning, and the process of learning to teach. The study provides a better understanding of the practicum setting with particular attention to the school advisor's perspective. Detail-rich cases highlight a range of issues for school advisors as they enact their responsibilities in attending to the student teachers' learning. These cases poignantly depict the complexities of the school advisor/student teacher dynamic and the various tensions that arise when conflicts emerge as the practicum unfolds. There are three questions that guide this study: (1) How do teachers perceive their roles as school advisors?; (2) How do teachers enact their roles as school advisors, and what are the foci of the school advisors' work with student teachers?; and (3) How do student teachers perceive the role of the school advisors? The practicum is a context in which one person assists the other in learning (to teach) and for this reason the conceptual framework used for data analysis is a curriculum perspective. Two levels of curriculum are discussed; level one of the curriculum framework is meeting the needs of the students while level two is meeting the needs of the student teacher. Both levels must be attended to throughout the teaching practicum. Five thematic areas were identified: (a) the student teachers' learning, (b) the working relationship, (c) experiences outside of the classroom, (d) lesson planning, and (e) classroom management. This study makes a significant contribution to the research literature on teacher education. First, it focuses upon the school advisor's role within the practicum. Second, one of the two case studies that deteriorated to the point where a change of venues was in order, serves as a rare example of a less-than-ideal practicum experience. Third, the conceptual framework of regarding the practicum as curriculum provides a new perspective for gaining insights into the complexities of learning to teach.