Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, 1970.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, 1970. / eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record.

Bruxism, the gnashing or grinding of one’s teeth, is a significant dental concern that can lead to severe damage of the tooth and gum structures and has been suggested to occur at higher rates in the developmentally disabled population. Very little research has been conducted in this area and of those articles, none of which utilized function based treatments nor conducted functional analyses. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the effects of a function based stimulation intervention on audible diurnal bruxism with two adolescent boys diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Functional analyses were conducted for both participants and revealed that bruxism was exhibited across all conditions and occurred highest in the alone condition, suggesting that the behavior was maintained by automatic reinforcement. Based on these findings, a function based stimulation treatment was developed to examine the effects of auditory and tactile stimuli on bruxism relative to conditions in which no stimuli were available. Results indicated that the function based stimulation intervention produced substantial decreases in bruxism for both participants. A post stimulation evaluation further supported these findings, showing the occurrence of bruxism remained at low levels following the removal of the stimulus, suggesting the application of the stimulation acted as an abolishing operation for bruxism.

Purpose: The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of bruxism on dental implant failure rates andmarginal bone loss (MBL), based on a systematic review of the literature. Materials and methods: An electronic search without time restrictions was undertaken (last updated in September2021) in three databases, plus handsearching. Only studies that provided enough informationon the criteria used for the diagnosis of at least ‘probable bruxism’ (self-report + clinicalexamination) were considered for inclusion. Meta-analyses were performed besides meta-regressions, in order to verify how the odds ratio (OR) was associated with follow-up time. Results: The review included 23 publications. Altogether, there were 1,991 and 9,438 implants placedin bruxers and non-bruxers, respectively. Pairwise meta-analysis including only the studiesthat provided enough information on the criteria used for the diagnosis of at least ‘probablebruxism’ resulted in significant failure rate difference between the groups (OR 1.987, p =0.015). There was an estimated increase of 0.010 in OR for every additional month of follow-up (p = 0.209). None of the included studies reported results on MBL separated betweenbruxers and non-bruxers. Conclusion: Implants placed in bruxers present a significant higher risk of failure than in non-bruxers.Studies comparing MBL between the groups are still lacking. / Syfte Den aktuella studien syftade till att utvärdera effekten av bruxism på dentala implantats misslyckandefrekvens och marginell benförlust (MBL), baserat på en systematisk översikt av litteraturen. Material och metod: En elektronisk sökning utan tidsbegränsningar gjordes (senast uppdaterad i september 2021) i tre databaser, plus handsökning. Endast studier som gav tillräckligt med information om de kriterier som användes för diagnos av åtminstone ’trolig bruxism’ (självrapportering + klinisk undersökning) övervägdes för inkludering. Metaanalyser utfördes förutom metaregressioner, för att verifiera hur oddskvoten (OR) var associerad med uppföljningstid. Resultat: Översikten omfattade 23 publikationer. Sammanlagt fanns det 1 991 och 9 438 implantat placerade i bruxare respektive icke-bruxare. Parvis metaanalys som endast inkluderade studierna som gav tillräckligt med information om kriterierna som användes för diagnosen av åtminstone ’probable bruxism’ resulterade i signifikant skillnad i felfrekvens mellan grupperna (OR 1,987, p = 0,015). Det var en uppskattad ökning med 0,010 i OR för varje ytterligare månad av uppföljning (p = 0,209). Ingen av de inkluderade studierna rapporterade resultat på MBL separerade av bruxare och icke-bruxare. Slutsats: Implantat placerade i bruxare innebär en signifikant högre risk för misslyckande än hos icke-bruxare. Studier som jämför MBL mellan grupperna saknas fortfarande.

O conhecimento das características funcionais da Síndrome de Down (SD) é importante para a ciência odontológica, pois indivíduos com SD apresentam alterações craniofaciais e dentárias que alteram o desempenho do sistema estomatognático. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar padrões de referência da força de mordida molar direita (FMMD) e esquerda (FMME) máximas de indivíduos com SD analisando a influência da idade, além de compará-los com indivíduos sem síndrome de Down. A abertura bucal, estalo na ATM, ranger dos dentes (sono e vigília) foram avaliados nos indivíduos com SD. Participaram 100 indivíduos com SD que foram distribuídos em quatro grupos: crianças entre 8 e 12 anos (GSDI, n=28); adolescentes entre 13 e 20 anos (GSDII, n=30); adultos jovens entre 21 e 40 anos (GSDIII, n=29) e adultos entre 41 e 60 anos (GSDIV, n=13). Os GSD (I, II, III e IV) foram pareados sujeito a sujeito com seus respectivos controles sem síndrome (GCI, GCII, GCIII e GCIV) por idade, gênero e IMC. Os registros da FMMD e FMME foram captados pelo dinamômetro digital. O estalo sem dor (ESD), ranger dos dentes no sono (RS) e na vigília (RV) foram analisados por meio de questionário anamnésico. A abertura sem auxílio e sem dor (A), abertura máxima sem auxílio (MSA) e abertura máxima com auxílio (MCA) foram mensuradas por régua milimétrica. Os dados de FMM máximas, abertura bucal foram tabulados e submetidos à análise estatística (SPSS 22.0, p ≤0,05). Os dados de ESD, RS e RV em indivíduos com SD foram demonstrados em valores percentuais. Houve diferença estatística significante (ANOVA, p ≤ 0,05) para FMME no GSD ao longo dos anos (p=0,00) registrando maior força para o GSDII. Na comparação dos Grupos etários com os Grupos controles houve diferença estatística significante (teste t de student, p ≤ 0,05) para FMMD: GSDII X GCII (p=0,00), GSDIII X GCIII (p=0,00), GSDIV X GCIV (p=0,00) e FMME: GSDI X GCI (p=0,00), GSDII X GCII (p=0,00), GSDIII X GCIII (p=0,00) e GSDIV X GCIV (p=0,00). As FMMD e FMME dos Grupos etários com SD foram menores quando comparados aos GC (I, II, III e IV). Na abertura bucal ocorreu diferença estatística significante (ANOVA, p ≤ 0,05) ao longo dos anos: A (p=0,00), MSA (p=0,00) e MCA (p=0,00) com maior A no GSDII e maior MSA e MCA no GSDIII. O GSDIII apresentou maior valor percentual de ESD e RDV e o GSDI maior de RDS. Os resultados deste estudo determinaram padrões referenciais de FMM ao longo dos anos em indivíduos com SD, com maior força para os adolescentes, diminuição gradual durante o envelhecimento, menor força máxima quando comparado aos indivíduos sem síndrome, influência da idade na abertura bucal e presença de ESD, RS e RV. / Knowledge of the functional characteristics of Down Syndrome (DS) is important for dental science, since individuals with DS present craniofacial and dental alterations that alter the performance of the stomatognathic system. The aim of this study was to determine reference patterns of maximal right (RMBF) and left (LMBF) molar bite force of SD individuals by analyzing the influence of age, as well as comparing them with healthy individuals. The mouth opening, clicking in the TMJ, teeth grinding (sleep and wakefulness) were evaluated in individuals with DS. A total of 100 individuals with DS were divided into four groups: children aged 8 to 12 years (DSGI, n = 28); Adolescents between 13 and 20 years old (DSGII, n = 30); Young adults aged between 21 and 40 years (DSGIII, n = 29) and adults between 41 and 60 years (DSGIV, n = 13). GDSs (I, II, III and IV) were paired subject to their respective healthy controls (CGI, CGII, CGIII and CGIV) by age, gender and BMI. RMBF and LMBF records were captured by the digital dynamometer. The painless popping (PP), teeth grinding in sleep (GS) and wakefulness (W) were analyzed by means of an anamnestic questionnaire. The pain free opening (PFO), maximum unassisted opening (MUO), maximum assisted opening (MAO) mouth opening were measured by millimeter rule. Maximum MBF data, mouth opening were tabulated and submitted to statistical analysis (SPSS 22.0, P≤0.05). The PP, GS and W data in individuals with SD were demonstrated in percentage values. There was a statistically significant difference (ANOVA, P ≤ 0.05) for LMBF in GDS over the years (P = 0.00), registering the highest force for DSGII. In the comparison between age groups and control groups without SD, there was a significant statistical difference (Student t test, P ≤ 0.05) for RMBF: DSGII X CGII (P = 0.00), DSGIII X CGIII (P = 0.00), DSGIV X CGIV (P = 0.00) and LMBF: DSGI X CGI (P = 0.00), DSG II X CGII (P = 0.00), DSGIII X CGIII (P = 0.00) and DSGIV X CGIV (P = 0.00). The RMBF and LMBF of the age groups with SD were smaller when compared to the CG (I, II, III and IV). In the mouth opening, there was a significant statistical difference (ANOVA, P ≤ 0.05) over the years: PFO (p = 0.00), MUO (P = 0.00) and MAO (P = 0.00) In DSGII and higher MUO and MAO in DSGIII. The DSGIII had the highest percentage of PP and W and the highest DSGI of GS. The results of this study determined reference patterns of MBF over the years in individuals with DS, with greater strength in adolescents, gradual decrease during aging, lower maximum strength when compared to healthy individuals, influence of age on mouth opening and presence of PP,GS and W.

O conhecimento das características funcionais da Síndrome de Down (SD) é importante para a ciência odontológica, pois indivíduos com SD apresentam alterações craniofaciais e dentárias que alteram o desempenho do sistema estomatognático. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar padrões de referência da força de mordida molar direita (FMMD) e esquerda (FMME) máximas de indivíduos com SD analisando a influência da idade, além de compará-los com indivíduos sem síndrome de Down. A abertura bucal, estalo na ATM, ranger dos dentes (sono e vigília) foram avaliados nos indivíduos com SD. Participaram 100 indivíduos com SD que foram distribuídos em quatro grupos: crianças entre 8 e 12 anos (GSDI, n=28); adolescentes entre 13 e 20 anos (GSDII, n=30); adultos jovens entre 21 e 40 anos (GSDIII, n=29) e adultos entre 41 e 60 anos (GSDIV, n=13). Os GSD (I, II, III e IV) foram pareados sujeito a sujeito com seus respectivos controles sem síndrome (GCI, GCII, GCIII e GCIV) por idade, gênero e IMC. Os registros da FMMD e FMME foram captados pelo dinamômetro digital. O estalo sem dor (ESD), ranger dos dentes no sono (RS) e na vigília (RV) foram analisados por meio de questionário anamnésico. A abertura sem auxílio e sem dor (A), abertura máxima sem auxílio (MSA) e abertura máxima com auxílio (MCA) foram mensuradas por régua milimétrica. Os dados de FMM máximas, abertura bucal foram tabulados e submetidos à análise estatística (SPSS 22.0, p ≤0,05). Os dados de ESD, RS e RV em indivíduos com SD foram demonstrados em valores percentuais. Houve diferença estatística significante (ANOVA, p ≤ 0,05) para FMME no GSD ao longo dos anos (p=0,00) registrando maior força para o GSDII. Na comparação dos Grupos etários com os Grupos controles houve diferença estatística significante (teste t de student, p ≤ 0,05) para FMMD: GSDII X GCII (p=0,00), GSDIII X GCIII (p=0,00), GSDIV X GCIV (p=0,00) e FMME: GSDI X GCI (p=0,00), GSDII X GCII (p=0,00), GSDIII X GCIII (p=0,00) e GSDIV X GCIV (p=0,00). As FMMD e FMME dos Grupos etários com SD foram menores quando comparados aos GC (I, II, III e IV). Na abertura bucal ocorreu diferença estatística significante (ANOVA, p ≤ 0,05) ao longo dos anos: A (p=0,00), MSA (p=0,00) e MCA (p=0,00) com maior A no GSDII e maior MSA e MCA no GSDIII. O GSDIII apresentou maior valor percentual de ESD e RDV e o GSDI maior de RDS. Os resultados deste estudo determinaram padrões referenciais de FMM ao longo dos anos em indivíduos com SD, com maior força para os adolescentes, diminuição gradual durante o envelhecimento, menor força máxima quando comparado aos indivíduos sem síndrome, influência da idade na abertura bucal e presença de ESD, RS e RV. / Knowledge of the functional characteristics of Down Syndrome (DS) is important for dental science, since individuals with DS present craniofacial and dental alterations that alter the performance of the stomatognathic system. The aim of this study was to determine reference patterns of maximal right (RMBF) and left (LMBF) molar bite force of SD individuals by analyzing the influence of age, as well as comparing them with healthy individuals. The mouth opening, clicking in the TMJ, teeth grinding (sleep and wakefulness) were evaluated in individuals with DS. A total of 100 individuals with DS were divided into four groups: children aged 8 to 12 years (DSGI, n = 28); Adolescents between 13 and 20 years old (DSGII, n = 30); Young adults aged between 21 and 40 years (DSGIII, n = 29) and adults between 41 and 60 years (DSGIV, n = 13). GDSs (I, II, III and IV) were paired subject to their respective healthy controls (CGI, CGII, CGIII and CGIV) by age, gender and BMI. RMBF and LMBF records were captured by the digital dynamometer. The painless popping (PP), teeth grinding in sleep (GS) and wakefulness (W) were analyzed by means of an anamnestic questionnaire. The pain free opening (PFO), maximum unassisted opening (MUO), maximum assisted opening (MAO) mouth opening were measured by millimeter rule. Maximum MBF data, mouth opening were tabulated and submitted to statistical analysis (SPSS 22.0, P≤0.05). The PP, GS and W data in individuals with SD were demonstrated in percentage values. There was a statistically significant difference (ANOVA, P ≤ 0.05) for LMBF in GDS over the years (P = 0.00), registering the highest force for DSGII. In the comparison between age groups and control groups without SD, there was a significant statistical difference (Student t test, P ≤ 0.05) for RMBF: DSGII X CGII (P = 0.00), DSGIII X CGIII (P = 0.00), DSGIV X CGIV (P = 0.00) and LMBF: DSGI X CGI (P = 0.00), DSG II X CGII (P = 0.00), DSGIII X CGIII (P = 0.00) and DSGIV X CGIV (P = 0.00). The RMBF and LMBF of the age groups with SD were smaller when compared to the CG (I, II, III and IV). In the mouth opening, there was a significant statistical difference (ANOVA, P ≤ 0.05) over the years: PFO (p = 0.00), MUO (P = 0.00) and MAO (P = 0.00) In DSGII and higher MUO and MAO in DSGIII. The DSGIII had the highest percentage of PP and W and the highest DSGI of GS. The results of this study determined reference patterns of MBF over the years in individuals with DS, with greater strength in adolescents, gradual decrease during aging, lower maximum strength when compared to healthy individuals, influence of age on mouth opening and presence of PP,GS and W.