Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / Estudo que objetiva analisar a relação entre religiosidade popular e os Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais do Ensino Religioso em confronto com a práxis pedagógica. A primeira parte aborda o surgimento da religiosidade popular procurando conceituá-la. Para isso foram realizadas no Grupo de pesquisa: Religiosidade Popular do Instituto de Teologia e Pastoral ITEPA observações de manifestações de religiosidade popular em diferentes locais e dessas observações foram realizados os diários de bordo. A pergunta sobre o que faz o ser humano buscar expressar de alguma forma sua religiosidade, assim como a busca de transcendência e o valor ao sagrado, finalizam esta primeira parte. A segunda parte procura compreender a religiosidade popular num sentido antropológico. Aborda a relação que o ser humano tem com o sagrado fortemente presente na religiosidade popular. Sendo que o sagrado é uma categoria presente em todas as religiões e é principalmente na religiosidade popular que as pessoas o expressam de forma bem criativa, com simplicidade, sem se preocuparem com os discursos teológicos das instituições. Neste sentido, traz-se duas experiências em sala de aula para mostrar que as manifestações de religiosidade popular estão presentes no cotidiano escolar. A partir das respostas encontradas nesta parte do trabalho surgem as questões referentes às crenças dos docentes e discentes e a relação com o conhecimento. Por isso é importante rever de que modo os Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais do Ensino Religioso apresentam o tema da religiosidade popular. Através de uma experiência em sala de aula constata-se que há uma tensão entre crença e conhecimento. Para tentar contornar essa problemática propõe-se a pedagogia da pergunta, a qual vem demonstrar que o mais importante não são as respostas, mas os questionamentos. / Study which aims to examine the relationship between popular religiosity and National Curricular Parameters of Religious Education in confrontation with the pedagogical practice. The first part deals with the emergence of popular religiosity. For that were held in Group research: Religiosities People's Institute of Theology and Pastoral - ITEPA observations of expressions of popular religiosity in different places and these comments were made the logs. The question about what makes human beings seek in any way express their religiosity and the search for transcendence and value to the sacred end this first part. The second part seeks to understand the popular religiosity in an anthropological sense. It addresses the relationship that the human being has with the sacred strongly present in popular religiosity. Since the sacred is a category present in all religions and is mainly in popular religiosity that people express so well the creative, with simplicity without caring about the speeches theological institutions. Therefore if brings two experiences in the classroom to show that the manifestations of popular religiosity are present in the daily school. From the answers found in this part of the work is that the questions arise concerning the beliefs of teachers and students in connection with the knowledge. So it is important to review how the National Curricular Parameters of Religious Education present the theme of popular religiosity. Through an experiment in the classroom noted that there is a tension between belief and knowledge. To try to circumvent this problem is proposed to pedagogy of the question, which comes to show that the most important are not the answers but the questions.

Depuis peu la question de la pédagogie universitaire en général, et du développement professionnel pédagogique (DPP) des universitaires en particulier est une question d’actualité en France. Toutefois ce concept reste polysémique et protéiforme. Qui plus est, d’aucuns attribuent à la France une spécificité à propos de ce DPP.Cette recherche appréhende le concept par le prisme de trois dimensions : les pratiques pédagogiques que déclarent mettre en œuvre les universitaires, leurs conceptions à propos de ce qui constitue un « bon » et un « mauvais » cours et enfin les attentes et besoins qu’ils expriment pour se développer pédagogiquement. Ce travail se réalise via un dispositif méthodologique mixte qui combine démarches qualitative et quantitative, et interroge des enseignants universitaires de disciplines et années d’expériences variées. Tant à propos de leurs pratiques, que de leurs conceptions ou encore de leurs attentes et besoins, les répondants ne forment pas un groupe homogène et leur DPP s’avère pouvoir être abordé sous différents aspects. Nos résultats font le constat que les pratiques d’enseignement et les conceptions sont encore très majoritairement inscrites dans un modèle magistral et transmissif. Mais avec une prise en compte de l’apprenant. Ce qui conduit les enseignants à identifier un besoin de soutien au DPP, mais une difficulté à identifier ce qui pourrait concourir à le satisfaire. Ce DPP apparaît comme un processus solitaire qui s’exerce dans un « isolement pédagogique ».Nous revenons sur la possibilité d’une spécificité française. Laquelle ne peut être démontrée si on analyse uniquement l’axe «enseignants». Ce qui conduit à envisager des perspectives d’analyse situationnelle. / Recently, teaching and learning in higher education, Faculty and educational development (FED) in particular, have become topical issues in France. However, the concepts are polysemic and protean. Moreover, some argue that there is a French specificity about FED. This research approaches the FED concept from three angles: teaching practices, faculty beliefs on what constitutes "good" or "bad" teaching, and their stated expectations and needs for professional development. This work was carried out with a mixed methodology combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, based on a survey of 174 academics of the same university, distributed across disciplines and various lengths of teaching experience. On the three accounts of practices, beliefs or expectations and needs, the population of respondents is heterogeneous and their FED may be approached in different ways. Our results point out that their teaching practices and views still predominately refer to the transmission model of teaching, blended with a consideration for the learner. This leads them to identify a need for support towards FED, but with a difficulty to identify what might contribute to satisfy it. FED appears as a solitary process that takes place in a "pedagogical isolation." When contemplating a possible French specificity, we concluded that it could not be established from the only perspective of academics. This leads to consider the prospects of a contextual analysis.