No description available.

Syftet med denna studie var att beskriva upplevelser av omvårdnadshandledning,så som den erfarits av sjuksköterskestudenter vid en högskola i södra Sverigeunder perioden 2007 -2009. Omvårdnadshandledning ingår som en obligatoriskdel av utbildningen och påbörjas under utbildningens andra termin i form avregelbundet återkommande gruppträffar, ca fyra gånger per termin, och fortgårsedan under resterande del av studietiden. Då det har noterats att behållningen avomvårdnadshandledning skiljer sig radikalt mellan olika studenter finns det ettintresse hos författarna av att undersöka vilka faktorer som påverkar densamma.Studien är en kvalitativ intervjustudie. Nio sjuksköterskestudenter deltog i studiensom genomfördes med hjälp av semistrukturerade intervjuer. Vid tolkningsarbetetav datan har författarna låtit sig inspireras av fenomenografin, där olikheter,snarare än likheter belyses. Studiens resultat visar att det tycks finnas ett sambandmellan den enskilde studentens behållning av omvårdnadshandledningen ochhandledarens im-plementering av den på förhand givna strukturen förhandledning, samt att information och feedback är några av de viktigastekomponenterna för att en givande omvårdnadshandledning skall kunna bedrivas. / The aim of this study was to describe different experiences of nursing groupsupervision, as it has been experienced by nursing students at a university in thesouth of Sweden during 2007 – 2009. Nursing group supervision is an obligatorypart of the nursing program and starts at the beginning of the second semester,consisting of regular group meetings approx. four times per semester, whichcontinues throughout the rest of the nursing programme. Since it has been notedthat the benefits of nursing group supervision differ radically between students,the authors are interested in investigating which factors affect and influence thesame. This is a qualitative interview study. Nine nursingstudents participated inthe study, which was conducted by semi-structured interviews. The analysis of thecollected data has been inspired by phenomenography, where differences, ratherthan similarities, are highlighted. The results of the study show that there may be aconnection between how much the individual student benefits from groupsupervision, and to what extent the mentor implements the defined structures forgroup supervision. Proper information and the use of feedback are two otherimportant factors contributing to a rewarding and beneficial group supervision.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:35:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 AlmiraN.pdf: 374864 bytes, checksum: 651e5d35db36dcc0f9139e835a581cb5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005-07-25 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / The present work highlights the importance of Dialogue in dealing with situations of crisis, and human conflicts. It has a starting point in some ideas of David Bohm, and in so doing, it presents itself with the challenge of testing the premise that dialogical strategies, of thought and action, can make the human choices inherent to those situations, more coherent and creative. They also allow us to elucidate and grasp them, towards broader comprehension and resolution, while keeping the framework of consistent assessment. However, we believe that said strategies are not, necessarily, problem solvers. With that in mind, we expanded the notion of Dialogue , systematizing dialogical visions of the world, derived from the ideas of David Bohm, Paulo Freire and Mikhail Bakhtin, in which they give priority to the Dialogue component, in all human relations within crucial contexts. From the elaboration of that systemic and dialogical interface, in which Dialogue appears as common theme, and pervasive tool, we detected the emerging of ancillary themes such as Liberty , Consciousness , Creativity , Ethics and Responsibility . We see these themes as ways of comprehending Life, as each one embodies interests, needs and shared human motivations. We have articulated them as a network, and added to that the need of Reflection in conjunction with Dialogue as a watchful call for noticing the incoherence / Este trabalho destaca a import?ncia do di?logo no enfrentamento de situa??es de crise e conflitos humanos, tomando como fundamento algumas id?ias de David Bohm. Nesse intento, a aposta ? a de que estrat?gias dial?gicas de pensamento e a??o podem tornar as escolhas, em tais situa??es, mais coerentes e criativas, permitindo elucid?-las e desvel?-las para que possam ser compreendidas e enfrentadas de forma mais alargada, num processo de reflex?o permanente. Todavia, acreditamos que tais estrat?gias n?o s?o, necessariamente, solucionadoras de problemas. Para isso, ampliamos a no??o de di?logo, sistematizando-o em cosmovis?es dial?gicas a partir das id?ias de David Bohm, Paulo Freire e Mikhail Bakhtin, naquilo em que principalizam o di?logo nas rela??es humanas em contextos de crise. A partir da composi??o dessa interface dial?gica, na qual o di?logo se configura como tema comum e como ferramenta, observamos a emerg?ncia de temas como liberdade, consci?ncia, criatividade, ?tica e responsabilidade que denominamos grandes temas humanos e os entendemos como maneiras de compreens?o da vida por conterem interesses, necessidades e motiva??es humanas compartilhadas. Articulamos esses temas em rede e acrescentamos a necessidade da reflex?o junto ao di?logo, no sentido de alertar para a incoer?ncia