• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 4
  • 2
  • Tagged with
  • 6
  • 6
  • 4
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Multiple roles for the zebrafish transcriptional activator SBF/Staf

Halbig, Kari Michele 15 May 2009 (has links)
Eukaryotic transcriptional activators stimulate transcription of genes otherwise expressed at low levels. The typical activator operates by binding to specific sites on DNA with its activating region contacting the multiprotein machinery that directs transcription. SBF/Staf is a transcriptional activator that binds to the SPH element found in the promoters of genes for snRNAs and genes that code for mRNAs. SBF/Staf binds to SPH through a reiterated zinc finger DNA binding domain and also contains two distinct activation domains, one for snRNA genes and one for mRNA genes. To test the role of SBF/Staf in vivo, morpholino antisense oligos were used to knock down SBF/Staf expression in zebrafish. A high percentage of developing zebrafish embryos exhibited abnormalities. Co-injection of a synthetic mRNA construct rescued the morpholino-induced knockdown. Furthermore, both the mRNA and snRNA activation domains have significant roles in the function of SBF/Staf because when each domain was removed separately, partial rescue of the knockdown phenotype was obtained. When both domains were removed, no rescue of the phenotype was observed. Unexpectedly, knockdown of SBF/Staf expression in zebrafish embryos caused an increase in steady-state levels of all endogenous mRNAs tested, as well as transcripts produced from co-injected U6 maxigenes. However, quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed a relatively smaller increase in the steady-state levels of several mRNAs from genes that contain a SPH element in their promoters. In zebrafish U6 genes, the SPH element is in the unique location of being next to the TATA box, instead of ~220 bp upstream of the start site as in mammals. To determine the significance of the proximally-located SPH element for transcription of the zebrafish U6 snRNA gene, the SPH element was mutated. Transcription of a zebrafish U6 maxigene was reduced to 20.6% in transfected ZF4 cells and 26.8% in injected embryos, compared to that of the U6 maxigene with a normal promoter. This work indicates a more global role of SBF/Staf in mRNA gene transcription, instead of only activating the transcription of snRNA and a few mRNA genes, leading to an increased importance of the role of SBF/Staf in transcriptional control.
2

Multiple roles for the zebrafish transcriptional activator SBF/Staf

Halbig, Kari Michele 15 May 2009 (has links)
Eukaryotic transcriptional activators stimulate transcription of genes otherwise expressed at low levels. The typical activator operates by binding to specific sites on DNA with its activating region contacting the multiprotein machinery that directs transcription. SBF/Staf is a transcriptional activator that binds to the SPH element found in the promoters of genes for snRNAs and genes that code for mRNAs. SBF/Staf binds to SPH through a reiterated zinc finger DNA binding domain and also contains two distinct activation domains, one for snRNA genes and one for mRNA genes. To test the role of SBF/Staf in vivo, morpholino antisense oligos were used to knock down SBF/Staf expression in zebrafish. A high percentage of developing zebrafish embryos exhibited abnormalities. Co-injection of a synthetic mRNA construct rescued the morpholino-induced knockdown. Furthermore, both the mRNA and snRNA activation domains have significant roles in the function of SBF/Staf because when each domain was removed separately, partial rescue of the knockdown phenotype was obtained. When both domains were removed, no rescue of the phenotype was observed. Unexpectedly, knockdown of SBF/Staf expression in zebrafish embryos caused an increase in steady-state levels of all endogenous mRNAs tested, as well as transcripts produced from co-injected U6 maxigenes. However, quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed a relatively smaller increase in the steady-state levels of several mRNAs from genes that contain a SPH element in their promoters. In zebrafish U6 genes, the SPH element is in the unique location of being next to the TATA box, instead of ~220 bp upstream of the start site as in mammals. To determine the significance of the proximally-located SPH element for transcription of the zebrafish U6 snRNA gene, the SPH element was mutated. Transcription of a zebrafish U6 maxigene was reduced to 20.6% in transfected ZF4 cells and 26.8% in injected embryos, compared to that of the U6 maxigene with a normal promoter. This work indicates a more global role of SBF/Staf in mRNA gene transcription, instead of only activating the transcription of snRNA and a few mRNA genes, leading to an increased importance of the role of SBF/Staf in transcriptional control.
3

On co-transcriptional splicing and U6 snRNA biogenesis

Listerman, Imke 11 September 2006 (has links) (PDF)
Messenger RNA (mRNA) is transcribed by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and has to undergo multiple processing events before it can be translated into a protein: a cap structure is added to its 5’ end, noncoding, intervening sequences (introns) are removed and coding exons are ligated together and a poly(A) tail is added to its 3’end. Splicing, the process of intron removal, is carried out in the spliceosome, a megacomplex comprehending up to 300 proteins. The core components of the spliceosome that directly interact with the pre-mRNA are the small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs). They consist of one of the U-rich snRNAs U1, U2, U4, U5 or U6 together with several particle-specific proteins and core proteins. All mRNA processing events can occur co-transcriptionally, i.e. while the RNA is still attached to the gene via Pol II. The in vivo studies of co-transcriptional RNA processing events had been possible only in special biological systems by immunoelectron microscopy and only recently, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) made it possible to investigate cotranscriptional splicing factor assembly on genes. My thesis work is divided into two parts: Part I shows that the core components of the splicing machinery are recruited co-transcriptionally to mammalian genes in vivo by ChIP. The co-transcriptional splicing factor recruitment is dependent on active transcription and the presence of introns in genes. Furthermore, a new assay was developed that allows for the first time the direct monitoring of co-transcriptional splicing in human cells. The topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin increases splicing factor accumulation on the c-fos gene as well as co-transcriptional splicing levels, which provides direct evidence that co-transcriptional splicing events depend on the kinetics of RNA synthesis. Part II of the thesis is aimed to investigate whether Pol II has a functional role in the biogenesis of the U6 snRNA, which is the RNA part of the U6 snRNP involved in splicing. Pol III had been shown to transcribe the U6 snRNA gene, but ChIP experiments revealed that Pol II is associated with all the active U6 snRNA gene promoters. Pol II inhibition studies uncovered that U6 snRNA expression and probably 3’end formation is dependent on Pol II.
4

Untersuchungen zum Mechanismus der katalytischen Aktivierung von Spleißosomen aus Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Rasche, Nicolas 18 July 2012 (has links)
No description available.
5

Determination of the Structure of the Spliceosomal U6 snRNP from Yeast, <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> / Untersuchung der Struktur des spliceosomalen U6 snRNPs in der Hefe, <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>

Karaduman, Ramazan 02 November 2006 (has links)
No description available.
6

On co-transcriptional splicing and U6 snRNA biogenesis

Listerman, Imke 25 July 2006 (has links)
Messenger RNA (mRNA) is transcribed by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and has to undergo multiple processing events before it can be translated into a protein: a cap structure is added to its 5’ end, noncoding, intervening sequences (introns) are removed and coding exons are ligated together and a poly(A) tail is added to its 3’end. Splicing, the process of intron removal, is carried out in the spliceosome, a megacomplex comprehending up to 300 proteins. The core components of the spliceosome that directly interact with the pre-mRNA are the small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs). They consist of one of the U-rich snRNAs U1, U2, U4, U5 or U6 together with several particle-specific proteins and core proteins. All mRNA processing events can occur co-transcriptionally, i.e. while the RNA is still attached to the gene via Pol II. The in vivo studies of co-transcriptional RNA processing events had been possible only in special biological systems by immunoelectron microscopy and only recently, Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) made it possible to investigate cotranscriptional splicing factor assembly on genes. My thesis work is divided into two parts: Part I shows that the core components of the splicing machinery are recruited co-transcriptionally to mammalian genes in vivo by ChIP. The co-transcriptional splicing factor recruitment is dependent on active transcription and the presence of introns in genes. Furthermore, a new assay was developed that allows for the first time the direct monitoring of co-transcriptional splicing in human cells. The topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin increases splicing factor accumulation on the c-fos gene as well as co-transcriptional splicing levels, which provides direct evidence that co-transcriptional splicing events depend on the kinetics of RNA synthesis. Part II of the thesis is aimed to investigate whether Pol II has a functional role in the biogenesis of the U6 snRNA, which is the RNA part of the U6 snRNP involved in splicing. Pol III had been shown to transcribe the U6 snRNA gene, but ChIP experiments revealed that Pol II is associated with all the active U6 snRNA gene promoters. Pol II inhibition studies uncovered that U6 snRNA expression and probably 3’end formation is dependent on Pol II.

Page generated in 0.0485 seconds