This dissertation examines the growth of environmentally sustainable commercial building practices as a voluntary, market-based standard called Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), created by the US Green Building Council. I address how environmental ideals became institutionalized and integrated into the design and construction of commercial buildings through the growth of this standard. My goal is to discuss the site at which an ideal becomes a part of organizational practice and to discuss mechanisms by which social movement ideals become institutionalized without the state as a coercive force.First, I look at the historical context in which the environmental movement and the green building movement emerged to see understand adoption of voluntary market-based standards. The USGBC was able to bring together three disparate forms: environmental ideals, the creation of a voluntary standard and a market-based profit focus. I examine how the decentralized environmental movement, the rise of "third wave" environmentalism and corporate strategic environmentalism and a lack of political opportunity made this new form a useful strategy for the movement. Then I examine the importance of the LEED AP accreditation program as a mechanism for integrating green practices into professional work by socializing them through three frames, the LEED system, integrated design and high efficiency buildings. I introduce a new model called hybrid professionalization to explain the integration of social movement ideals across an industry and with a variety of professional groups. Finally, I turn to the demand side of the field to examine the role of organizational consumers and their strategies to rationalize green building to stakeholders. I discuss various ways that green buildings allowed organizations to display and enact their greenness.

The following paper will explore the future of sustainable building practices as it relates to building design rating systems and whether building design rating systems are effective in conserving energy and resources in the construction of new buildings. This paper will begin by highlighting some of the general principles behind sustainable design practices, and the challenges of determining if building design rating systems are utilized effectively towards the goal of sustainability. In addition, the paper will highlight issues specific to ongoing litigation in Gifford v. U.S. Green Building Council and allegations made within the lawsuit that question the methodology and efficacy of building design rating systems. How political and ideological influences have propelled sustainability practices into the mainstream, and to what extent government is and should be involved in regulating building design rating systems will also be explored. Lastly, how will new energy performance and sustainable design methodologies, which are now being required in the law, affect the professional liability of building design professionals in the future?

No description available.

Miljöcertifieringssystemet för byggnader, LEED (Leadership in Energy &Environmental Design) lanserades 1998 i USA av USGBC (United States GreenBuilding Council). USGBC är en icke vinstdrivande organisation, vars mål är attbidra till utökat hållbart byggande. Skanskas första byggnad som certifieradesenligt LEED färdigställdes 2001 i den amerikanska delstaten North Carolina. Islutet av februari 2009 offentliggjordes det att Skanska skall införa systemet i sinNordiska organisation.Undersökningen som genomförts handlar om ett av LEED New Constructions sexdelområden, Materials & Resources. Materialhanteringen för ett byggprojekt somSkanska uppfört har analyserats för att avgöra huruvida det skulle kunna erhållapoäng vid en certifiering enligt LEED. Metoden för undersökningen har varitsamtal med materialleverantörer och medarbetare från Skanskas organisation somvarit delaktiga i byggprojektet. Material som använts för undersökningen är LEEDfor New Construction Version 2.2 och projektdokumentation av olika slag. Enligtvår undersökning skulle det byggprojekt som vi analyserat kunnat erhålla tre avtotalt 13 poäng vid en certifiering. / The environmental certification system for buildings, LEED (Leadership inEnergy & Environmental Design) was launched in 1998 by USGBC (UnitedStates Green Building Council). USGBC is a non-profit organization aiming foran expansion of sustainable building practices and education. The first ofSkanska’s buildings to be certified according to LEED standards was finished inNorth Carolina in 2001. By the end of February 2009 Skanska made public thatthe system was to be adopted in their Nordic organization.This study examines one of LEED New Construction’s six subcategories,Materials & Resources. The materials handling of a Skanska construction projecthas been analyzed to determine whether it could receive credits if certifiedaccording to LEED. The method used has been verbal contact with materialsuppliers and Skanska staff involved in the construction project. The theoreticalbasis has mainly been LEED for New Construction Version 2.2 and several kindsof project documentation. It is concluded in this study that the construction projectanalyzed could have received three of a total of 13 credits if certified.

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (or LEED) is the most commonly used green building rating system in the United States, bestowing upon LEED certified buildings the prestige of being considered more sustainable than their non-certified neighbors. The public often assumes that LEED certified buildings are completely sustainable or even net-zero with regards to greenhouse gas emissions, but in actuality buildings certified under the most popular version of LEED are only required to be 15% more energy efficient than required by most state building codes – a far cry from the energy usage cuts needed to stave off global warming. By examining the history of LEED and its parent organization (the United States Green Building Council), contemporary criticisms of the certification system and its widespread adoption, and real-world performance of existing LEED buildings, this thesis seeks to uncover whether the LEED system is an effective tool in the fight against climate change and why it has yet to live up to its name.

Certification of buildings is now a big part of the construction industry. The role and importance of certifications is now undeniable. It has a positive impact on the environment, and in the meantime companies can label themselves as eco-friendly. Skanska is one of the biggest construction companies in Sweden. Lately LEED has become the most common certification system they use on larger commercial buildings. A new version has just been released, but how well has the system adapted to a Swedish market and environment, or vice versa? This can be difficult given that the certification system has been developed for an American market. In combination with the eventual problems given the system’s origin, working with LEED on the construction site is also a lot of work. Our Research indicates that approximately 20% of a project engineer’s time is taken up by work with the system. This thesis examines the possibilities of reducing the amount of time LEED takes up. U.S Green Building Council has released a fourth version of LEED. In order to streamline the work with certification, an updated tool has been made that explains the credit Sourcing of Raw Materials and focuses on the essential parts for people who work in construction. In order to do this the previous tool made by Skanska has been studied, along with interviews with employees of the company. USGBC’s LEED Reference Guide is the core of the information regarding the new version. The conclusion is that given the right tools, the work with LEED can be more efficient.

This study examines the LEED-ND pilot rating program created by the United States Green Building Council (USGBC), the Congress for New Urbanism, and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) in 2007. The rating system is evaluated based on its application as a broad set of national standards meant to encourage green neighborhood development. The main case study is a master planned community in semi-rural Paso Robles, California. Among other things, the study discovers problems related to the application of the rating system in semi-rural and rural regions of the Western United States. Both the standards used by the rating system and the certification process itself were considered through a case study methodology.